Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

sparksd

macrumors G3
Jun 7, 2015
9,773
32,449
Seattle WA
I had a 17" laptop and it was too big for a laptop and the screen was too small for my main desktop. I'd far rather use my 12.9 with a large monitor and the display appropriately scaled for widescreen aspect ratio when mirroring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: secretk

Digitalguy

macrumors 601
Apr 15, 2019
4,612
4,400
I would buy it in a heartbeat and use it a lot in portrait mode as an amazing document and magazine reader...and a as big desktop ipad. When I bought the 12.9 in 2015 I bought it mainly as a document/magazine/pdf book/sheet music reader. Didn't use is for anything else until IOS 11 in 2017... So 16in would be a dream...
 

subjonas

macrumors 603
Feb 10, 2014
5,946
6,444
He doesn’t really give a good use case for this. If it’s almost always docked, then how is its function different from the 16” MBP—other than in negative ways since it can’t run the same pro applications, at sustained speeds, many processes going at the same time, etc.? It wouldn’t even be much cheaper. The main advantage would have to be when it’s undocked, which he explicitly said would not be often.

The one possibly significant—albeit still niche—market for this device that I can see would be serious/professional digital artists who want a 16” portable canvas to use with the Apple Pencil. But of course the big caveat is the software they use has to be available on iPad (I’m a digital artist and my software is not).

Other than serious artists, even in this iPad enthusiast forum I think only a small minority would actually purchase this, especially given the likely high price. Imagine how small the market would be out in the real world.
 

gsal

macrumors regular
Jun 1, 2019
137
231
At that size, the keyboard would need to be built in, as it would be most suited for use in “laptop mode.” Then have the keyboard fold away in some fashion to use in tablet mode.

I can see creative professionals/hobbyists salivating over this.
 

ericwn

macrumors G5
Apr 24, 2016
12,038
10,820
I’d be interested in a bigger iPad Pro for sure. If it ends up being useful for me only a real world test would show. :)
 

UltimateSyn

macrumors 601
Mar 3, 2008
4,891
8,992
Massachusetts
The iPad is fundamentally first-and-foremost a handheld touch-based device. This would not be comfortable held in the hands; too heavy and cumbersome. I think 13" will forever be the largest iPad size. I would like to see them add more thorough external monitor support, though.
 

KittyKatta

macrumors 65816
Feb 24, 2011
1,058
1,212
SoCal
The iPad is fundamentally first-and-foremost a handheld touch-based device. This would not be comfortable held in the hands; too heavy and cumbersome. I think 13" will forever be the largest iPad size.
No offense, but I think we’ve reached the point where “the iPad is a handheld touch-based device” argument should ever be mentioned again.

2011 - Smart Cover rolls to be Desktop Stand
2014 - Digital AV adapter
2015 - Smart Keyboard
2015 - Apple Pencil
2019 - Mouse Accessibility Support
2019 - Mac Sidecar Support
2020 - Built in Trackpad/Mouse Support
2020 - Magic Keyboard

Clearly the iPad has outgrown and far surpassed its initial 2009 design. So in 2020 then why would we put an outdated limitation on what the future of the iPad should or shouldn’t be? We’re probably entering the most exciting time ever in the evolution of the iPad so if Apple wants to experiment with sizes or features then I’m all for it.
 
Last edited:

TheRealAlex

macrumors 68030
Sep 2, 2015
2,945
2,167
Yes please. One may dream.

Problem is iOS vs MacOS. While Microsoft uses Windows 10 across all platforms. And for $1,999

I’ll stick with my iPad Pro 11” And a $1,400 14” MacBook Pro. I feel there is a need and use for both devices. Not one mega expensive device that isn’t as good as either individualy.

Also this spins a narrative that Apple is now playing catch up to Microsoft.
the amount of iPad vs Surface tables or MAcBook Pros vs. SurafceBook Pros that Microsoft sells is 4,000 to 1 and that’s a lowball.
 

subjonas

macrumors 603
Feb 10, 2014
5,946
6,444
I know people out here have to stick to outdated and irrational anger at competitor concepts, but I’d rather have an ARM based MacBook Pro with a detachable screen.
If it’s a mbp, I assume it would run macOS, and when in tablet mode it switches to ipados?
As far as real world though, besides the issue of getting x86 applications over to arm, I think it’d run into the same problem of how many people (except artists) would actually detach the screen. People who own the surface book don’t seem to detach their 12” screens often, so a 16” screen would be detached even less.
 

MBX

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Sep 14, 2006
2,030
816
Why 15’’ or 16’’ iPad Pro “Max”?

- A lot of people, especially designers and illustrators would love a bigger iPad screen to draw on (could compete with Cintiq).

- Bigger screen = more space for even better productivity multitasking.

- Bigger screen to play games on or browse web, watch movies, etc. I would love that.

- Bigger screen to edit videos on or use Lightroom/ Photoshop and other Photo editors. More pro apps will come too for sure.

- Yes it would be mostly docked but there would be many examples where you could hold it in tablet mode as a big magazine or newspaper reader as well. It’s not like it’s that heavy.

If it’s not for you then you can still buy the 13’’ or 11’’ version but for everyone else a bigger option is welcome.
 

The Game 161

macrumors Nehalem
Dec 15, 2010
30,753
20,006
UK
I could see this being possible down the line. I would hope apple would still release a 12.9./13 inch model too though.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.