Hi MacRumors,
I'm pleased to see the new MacBook Pro - have really waited a long time to see it, and the Sandy Bridge i7 Quad-core is just awesome. If I should stay at low-end or high-end, I am not so sure.. It's a 450$ difference for me in Denmark, but I guess I'll wait and eventually see if any benchmark/reviews pops up @ uTewb (YouTube). What do you choose?
My question is: should I go for the 1680x1050 resolution on a 15" MacBook Pro - talking glossy, not anti-glare here - would that be worth it? It's my first Apple notebook, so I have no idea if it's going to be too small or eye candy. My current Mac Mini is connected to a 22" with 1680x1050 which I think is nice.
I would use it for some web browsing, Photoshop, school (projects, studying etc.), Modern Warfare 2, eventually World of Warcraft - would the low-end graphiccard keep up with those game @ 1680x1050 or would I have to upgrade to hi-end model?
I'm pleased to see the new MacBook Pro - have really waited a long time to see it, and the Sandy Bridge i7 Quad-core is just awesome. If I should stay at low-end or high-end, I am not so sure.. It's a 450$ difference for me in Denmark, but I guess I'll wait and eventually see if any benchmark/reviews pops up @ uTewb (YouTube). What do you choose?
My question is: should I go for the 1680x1050 resolution on a 15" MacBook Pro - talking glossy, not anti-glare here - would that be worth it? It's my first Apple notebook, so I have no idea if it's going to be too small or eye candy. My current Mac Mini is connected to a 22" with 1680x1050 which I think is nice.
I would use it for some web browsing, Photoshop, school (projects, studying etc.), Modern Warfare 2, eventually World of Warcraft - would the low-end graphiccard keep up with those game @ 1680x1050 or would I have to upgrade to hi-end model?