LMAO, it's always the day after a keynote that rumors start spreading for what's coming in the next keynote!
Since apple hates creative pros nowdays I could see them killing the 17 inch altogether. Maybe even kill the Mac Pro tower while there at it.
Just one more cable to carry or keep track of... Not looking for that with my laptop.Exactly...
I'd rather have 2 firewire 800 ports. You can just get the adapter cable anyways.
very true...Of course I'm going to end up buying tons of cables but my camera crew and editors swap cables and borrow things all the time. At fast times of need...ease of use or accessibility counts a lot for professionals on the go. Why not have both?
Stop trolling, troller!this upgrade drama seems to be more and more just a consumer joke. What is the next apple "event" about ? MacBook Pro Update....now with a blue or green power button.......what a SENSATION !!!
I disagree. I think the $999 polycarbonate MacBook is still in the lineup only to clear out inventory, and once it's gone, it's gone. I think that $1,299 will ultimately become the new entry level price.My bets they release a cheapo macbook at the same time
I've seen posts by other "digital photographers" who says they can't see jack on a matte screen in the field but have much better experience with glossy. It's not quite a universal truth that matte is required for digital media pros. Personally, it's nearly impossible for me to see anything at all on my matte display outside at any angle. With glossy, as long as I'm not reflecting the sun into my face I can see what I'm doing.
I'm sure Apple crunched the numbers and knows that of the (apparent) minority that preferred matte over glossy, an even small number of those would actually go buy a Windows laptop for that sole reason. Will you? Perhaps. However, there seem to be a decent number people who say they're "in the business" and are perfectly pleased with their correctly calibrated glossy displays. Regardless, would have been nice of them not to kill the matte option.
I've seen posts by other "digital photographers" who says they can't see jack on a matte screen in the field but have much better experience with glossy. It's not quite a universal truth that matte is required for digital media pros. Personally, it's nearly impossible for me to see anything at all on my matte display outside at any angle. With glossy, as long as I'm not reflecting the sun into my face I can see what I'm doing.
Why? I mean, sure, maybe two FW800 ports, but leaving on FW400 would be pointless.
Because 800 goes back to 400. 400 goes not go forward to 800. It'd be like having DVI and VGA on a laptop.
I've seen posts by other "digital photographers" who says they can't see jack on a matte screen in the field but have much better experience with glossy. It's not quite a universal truth that matte is required for digital media pros. Personally, it's nearly impossible for me to see anything at all on my matte display outside at any angle. With glossy, as long as I'm not reflecting the sun into my face I can see what I'm doing.
I'm sure Apple crunched the numbers and knows that of the (apparent) minority that preferred matte over glossy, an even small number of those would actually go buy a Windows laptop for that sole reason. Will you? Perhaps. However, there seem to be a decent number people who say they're "in the business" and are perfectly pleased with their correctly calibrated glossy displays. Regardless, would have been nice of them not to kill the matte option.
Good! I was waiting for some news on this bull honky.
I agree that Apple will announce this as an Apple Store update probably in December of this year. I will be first online to customize and buy mine. I also hope they have enough demand by then to include a matte version.
Can't wait!
I don't like how the notebook lineup has been fragmented with the latest release. The failure to update the 17" MB and to still offer the previous white MacBook has created a strange combination of notebook offerings.
I hope Apple cleans up their notebook lines soon. Update the 17" to match the new model MBs. And discontinue or rebrand the previous MacBook to be an inexpensive consumer/education market notebook (like what iBook was to PowerBook).
I disagree. I think the $999 polycarbonate MacBook is still in the lineup only to clear out inventory, and once it's gone, it's gone. I think that $1,299 will ultimately become the new entry level price.
What a joke?
Apple Market Share plummets back to ~5% with the recession talk and all. Plus offering they consumers no choice. Seems the only factor keeping them a float is the iPhone and iPods, wonder how long that will last once the "cool factor" dies.
Time for a hackintosh.![]()
You're kidding right? Why do you need a touchscreen? Blu-ray on a notebook? GPS? What industry do you work in again?
Audio/visual customers aren't buy Macbooks. And no, they won't take FW800 away (I know you were just being a smart ass though). FW800, if I remember correctly, is the same port FW3200 will use (and is backwards compatible). You can always get a cheap little FW400 to FW800 adapter.