Laptop Display Calibration myths
Its encouraging to read all the discussions on Apple Laptop Display quality, calibrations, glossy V. matt, etc. However, there are obviously an awful lot of misconceptions around. Id like to put something straight. The fact is that although Apple laptop displays are good compared to those from other manufacturers, they are just not good enough for professional colour correction. When I say professional, I do not mean the inflationally applied, and highly euphemistic term, used today.
Laptop displays are calibratable, but only to a limited extent - thats a fact! I dont care what may claim. All you can do is optimise - ergo, get the best possible calibration out of your particular display. The result will not nearly approach the colour accuracy of one of the better EIZO desktop displays.
The new MB and MBP displays have a blue cast or at least a bluish tone which you really cant get rid of, not even with hardware calibration devices such as Spyder. The viewing angle is still quite poor so if you look at the screen from an angle, silvers, grays appear yellowish, which means that if you are showing a friend sitting next to you something on the display he will see a colour shift. This caveat is slightly smaller on 17 inch displays though, but all-in-all this is a problem which Apple doesnt seem to want solve.
The only workaround for professional colour correction is to hook your laptop up to a descent desktop screen at home. This means a laptop is not a very good solution for professional freelance designers who need to do colour work "on-the-road", in trains, planes or in customers offices.
I think Apple should address these problems or at least come clean instead of pretending their laptops are viable as mobile professional work stations for designers and photographers because is only partially true, but with pretty serious limitations.