Yes, you are right. I suppose cannibalization should not be a concern for Apple. At least this is what Tim Cook said at an earnings report back in 2013:Not just 16", it would eat into iMacs top end as well. But it's fine as long as people buy a product from Apple's lineup right?
Me neither. but Apple seems to do. I actually bought an LG Gram 17, with a 17-inch 16:10 screen with a 2560x1600 resolution. I think it is great and is the closest thing possible to a large MacBook Air since Apple will not release one. It is brilliant and Apple should think twice before denying its customers this possibility.I don't see the need to equate screen size with processing power.
I'd buy a 16, 17 or 18 Air.
Me neither. but Apple seems to do. I actually bought an LG Gram 17, with a 17-inch 16:10 screen with a 2560x1600 resolution. I think it is great and is the closest thing possible to a large MacBook Air since Apple will not release one. It is brilliant and Apple should think twice before denying its customers this possibility.
So far I am liking it a lot. The 17-inch screen gives a sense of freedom which I do not have in the constrained limits of a 13.3-inch screen. I would also like a 4K display. However, the 2560x1600 display on the LG Gram 17 is impressively good, and the resolution is fine and the text is sharp enough.I love the concept of the Gram and I've played with it at Costco many times.
I'd like it with a 4k display and an M1 or M2. It would be mobility to me when I don't need the MacBook Pro 16.
LG Gram also has upgradeable RAM (1 stick) and you can add an NVMe drive or replace the existing one.
The Mythical Large Airs. Never coming just like Large iPads are not. These devices are all about portability and not just lightness or thinness. The best we can hope for is a bigger screen MacBook Air/iPad Pro in a similar sized shell.I don't see the need to equate screen size with processing power.
I'd buy a 16, 17 or 18 Air.
LG Gram's 17" 2k (ish) screen is good because it's got Windows that allows custom scaling on low res screens. That screen on a Mac would just suck. Imagine a 1280x800 Screen Size on a 17" display.So far I am liking it a lot. The 17-inch screen gives a sense of freedom which I do not have in the constrained limits of a 13.3-inch screen. I would also like a 4K display. However, the 2560x1600 display on the LG Gram 17 is impressively good, and the resolution is fine and the text is sharp enough.
I have bought mine last week and I made a quite comprehensive preliminary review of it after my first 24 hours, which I put in this topic here if you would like to take a look: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/lg-gram-17.2320107/?post=30562597#post-30562597.
LG Gram's 17" 2k (ish) screen is good because it's got Windows that allows custom scaling on low res screens. That screen on a Mac would just suck. Imagine a 1280x800 Screen Size on a 17" display.
Nope, and I think it is just too small of market that Apple would do it. A 15" MBA on the other hand would tap a huge market.
MacOS allows for different scaling options, but not using an aspect ratio that corresponds to the actual resolution.LG Gram's 17" 2k (ish) screen is good because it's got Windows that allows custom scaling on low res screens. That screen on a Mac would just suck. Imagine a 1280x800 Screen Size on a 17" display.