2.0Ghz vs 2.4Ghz Macbooks

Discussion in 'Buying Tips and Advice' started by t-rev, Feb 6, 2009.

  1. t-rev macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    #1
    How much of a difference is there between the 2.0 and 2.4 Macbooks? I'm looking for a MB for photo editing, basic video editing (short clips of the kids, etc), would like to run Windows as well. I'm going to up the RAM to 4gb as well. Can I get by with the 2.0?
     
  2. és: macrumors 6502a

    és:

    #2
    The 2.0 is pretty quick. It's a good processor. However, as obvious as this sounds you're going to get a 20% faster processor. You won't notice the difference when emailing or surfing the web but if you're doing a lot of photo and video editing involving large images and video rendering then you'll notice that 20%.

    The 2.0 stacked with ram will handle that well but I would just get the best you can afford. If you can afford the 2.4 without breaking the bank then go for it. If you can't, you'll have a great machine.
     
  3. iSamurai macrumors 65816

    iSamurai

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Location:
    ɹǝpun uʍop 'ǝuɐqsı&#
    #3
    I bought a 2.2GHz MB, instead of the 2.4GHz (2nd last revision of the white plastic macbooks). To be honest, after using mine and trying out my friend's 2.4GHz, there's not much of a difference apart from maybe a few split seconds quicker in say, rendering something in Photoshop. Mine was upped to 4GB RAM, while his was stock 1 or 2GB :confused:.

    For this 2.0 you're talking about, I assume that it's the plastic white MB vs the aluminium MB; my MB is already lightning fast, and they've even updated the plastic MB recently (I belive the FSB too), so 2.0 should be enough.
     
  4. Abstract macrumors Penryn

    Abstract

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Location:
    Location Location Location
    #4
    ^^^No, he's likely talking about both aluminium models.


    From what you told us, you won't notice a difference, or that difference won't be worth the money to you, since the 3 or 4 seconds required in iMovie are likely inconsequential to you. ;)

    The only reason to pay is if you really don't mind paying for the extra 20% increase in performance, since it also includes the illuminated keyboard. The 2.0 GHz version doesn't have it. ;)
     
  5. AstrosFan macrumors 6502

    AstrosFan

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    #5
    Here's a link to Macworld's benchmark tests of the 2 models:

    http://www.macdeveloperjournal.com/article/136236-2/2008/10/aluminummacbook.html

    To quote from the article:
    "Comparing the top of line 2.4GHz MacBook to its less expensive, lower-powered 2GHz sibling, we find the high-end model nearly 9 percent faster in overall Speedmark performance, with narrower performance gaps in graphics tests and wider gaps in processor tests, like Cinema 4D. Speaking of Cinema4D, we’ve just received Cinema4D R11 and we’ll be adding that application to our testing repertoire soon."

    Best wishes!
     
  6. arthursiew macrumors 6502

    arthursiew

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    #6
    I have been using my 2.0 MacBook for a while and a few weeks I went to the Apple Store and I played around w/ the 2.4. There's not much of a difference. I don't really care much about the backlit keyboard, but I think the 2.0 was a better option that the 2.4. The 2.4 is expensive and it's not worth the price difference.
     

Share This Page