Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

GermanyChris

macrumors 601
Original poster
How does the 2.3DC perform compared to the 2.0DP..real world not benchmark??

Any input gentlemen?
 
The 2.3DC is much better than the 2.0DP in my experience. I can actually watch standard def Flash vids and not have them be grainy or like slideshows. Benchmarks say that the 2.3DC is roughly equivalent in performance to the first-gen CoreDuo Mac mini I have and I'd say that in the real world that is largely the case.
 
The 2.3DC is much better than the 2.0DP in my experience. I can actually watch standard def Flash vids and not have them be grainy or like slideshows. Benchmarks say that the 2.3DC is roughly equivalent in performance to the first-gen CoreDuo Mac mini I have and I'd say that in the real world that is largely the case.

Do you know about the power consumption comparison? I'm assuming the the DC is quite a bit better because there is less to cool.
 
Do you know about the power consumption comparison? I'm assuming the the DC is quite a bit better because there is less to cool.

I don't have any numbers to back it up, but my 2.3DC kicked up considerably less heat than my 2.0DP. It's a chip on a much smaller die/process. It's definitely an upgrade all around.
 
I don't have any numbers to back it up, but my 2.3DC kicked up considerably less heat than my 2.0DP. It's a chip on a much smaller die/process. It's definitely an upgrade all around.

I looked at the numbers you just told me what I wanted to know.. Thank you
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.