Originally posted by ShawnLavin
Your reasoning is exactly why I chose my language...
"would suit me just fine...", note the pronoun
"would guarantee enough real world performance for just about anyone for the next cycle."
Yes, some people will gladly soak up every CPU cycle that is available, but they are not 'just about everyone', they are the exception and by the the time the apps catch up with this need, the cycle (I think of a computer model cycle as 1 year max) will have come about.
I still maintain that a dual 1.2 will be more practical than a single 2.4 as it will price out a lot cheaper until the yields on 2.4 go way up and the number of high end apps that benefit from SMP under OS X goes up all the time.