Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

koobcamuk

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Oct 23, 2006
3,195
9
Is it worth getting the 2.6 Ghz i7 over the 2.3 Ghz i7 Mac Mini?

All other things being equal, 16GB RAM, SSD, etc, would there be a noticeable performance boost when using lightroom 5 (D800E raw files)?

Comments appreciated.
 

garirry

macrumors 68000
Apr 27, 2013
1,543
3,904
Canada is my city
Is it worth getting the 2.6 Ghz i7 over the 2.3 Ghz i7 Mac Mini?

All other things being equal, 16GB RAM, SSD, etc, would there be a noticeable performance boost when using lightroom 5 (D800E raw files)?

Comments appreciated.

The speed difference is very minor and you will not notice a very strong difference. I checked the processor's benchmarks and there they are:
2.6 GHz: 12657
2.3 GHz: 11685
i5 Mac: 5718
If these numbers don't mean anything to you, then I recommend not spending money on the extra .3 GHz because there is no point in that. Getting a Core i7 instead of i5 is a very good choice because the performance is double than the i5. Hope this helps.
 

blanka

macrumors 68000
Jul 30, 2012
1,551
4
I think you have more performance boost on D800E raw files by using NX2 than by adding 0.3 Ghz.
If you use a D800E what it is good at: competing with system/large format camera's on architecture, product, fashion shots, invest in NX2. It will pull much more out of the raw files than Lightroom can do. If you do things a D800E is not good at: like news or weddings: trade it for the new D810. It will have sRAW, and allows you to shoot on 16megapixels on the high-speed crap shots. That will decrease processing time by a 55% instead of the meagre 10% the 2.6 offers.
 

koobcamuk

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Oct 23, 2006
3,195
9
The speed difference is very minor and you will not notice a very strong difference. I checked the processor's benchmarks and there they are:
2.6 GHz: 12657
2.3 GHz: 11685
i5 Mac: 5718
If these numbers don't mean anything to you, then I recommend not spending money on the extra .3 GHz because there is no point in that. Getting a Core i7 instead of i5 is a very good choice because the performance is double than the i5. Hope this helps.

Very helpful information, thank you. I went with the 2.3 i7, and spent money on SSDs instead.

http://cl.ly/image/3Z461F2M3v3c/WP_20140612_15_49_39_Pro.jpg

Search? We have had at least 1 thread on exactly this topic before..
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1716004/

The forums are a mess, and I wanted answers specifically for the D800E, but thanks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.