Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

burkex

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 3, 2009
5
0
Hi. I'm a composer using Logic Studio. I'm planning on buying the new Imac but i m still hesitating between the 2.93 and 3.06 GHz. Is there a major difference between both? Is it worth 160 euros to upgrade to 3.06 or is the 2.93 enough? Is there a big difference?
Thanx in advance.
 

Styxie

macrumors member
Oct 29, 2008
91
0
Holland
My guess is 160 euros for 130 MHz extra will not be noticable. So no, if I were you I wouldn't go for the 3.06, it's too overpriced. Go with the 2.93 is my advice.
 

burkex

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 3, 2009
5
0
That's why i thought!! :rolleyes:
I decided to put the money on the ATI instead.....
but my main problem is that Logic studio demands a lot of CPU so that s why i m wondering if the 2.93 would be enough to run Logic smoothly at medium- full capacity)
 

synagence

macrumors 6502a
Jul 23, 2008
879
0
I would say you'll hardly notice the difference in the core speed UNLESS the 3.06 is a different revision of the C2D and has more L2 cache or something
 

burkex

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 3, 2009
5
0
Ok i just bought the 3.06 finally :D
Can't wait to have it ( 3-5 weeks deliver) :(:rolleyes:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.