It's the sad truth... But did anyone mention that you cant run osx on a dell!![]()
Sure the numbers aren't directly comparable since the hardware is differet, but anything even near a $1500 discrepancy is quite alot to pay for one OS over another.
It's the sad truth... But did anyone mention that you cant run osx on a dell!![]()
I'm about to pull the trigger on a studio xps, after 25% off I can get 8gb of ram, a good video card, 500gb hd, and the 2.66 i7 chip with dells top of the line 24" ultrasharp for $1,400...
Just to make it clear, I was being sarcastic, I think Apple is brutally overcharging for all of their new updates
sarcasm doesn't translate well on the internets...!![]()
Have fun in Windows land, I bet you will be back soon.
Farewell.
(actually if going Windows at least wait for Windows 7 to come out)
Don't I know it... It's always good to let people know
I'm sure I will be back, and if you look at my thread "G5, I'm so sory..." you can help me decide between what I buy next
Double check the specs and see if you can make a Hackintosh out of your Dell.
I would for a 2008 8-Core 2.8ghz myself, and grab a 4870 card.
That comparison isn't even fair. The two computers use completely different processors and system architectures.
The Studio XPS is using a desktop core i7, a $600 processor. The Mac Pro is using a Xeon X5500, a $1300 process. The Studio is only capable of having one processor, the Mac Pro can handle two.
Compare to a Precision and you might have an argument but you will find the prices are MUCH closer.
So would I, if I could afford it
Check Craigslist and Ebay this week.
I bet some people are selling theirs cheap to get Nehalem.
Nope Mac pro "Quad-Core" using Xeon 3520 that = Core i7 920 , both price / performanceThe Studio XPS is using a desktop core i7, a $600 processor. The Mac Pro is using a Xeon X5500, a $1300 process
That comparison isn't even fair. The two computers use completely different processors and system architectures.
The Studio XPS is using a desktop core i7, a $600 processor. The Mac Pro is using a Xeon X5500, a $1300 process. The Studio is only capable of having one processor, the Mac Pro can handle two.
Compare to a Precision and you might have an argument but you will find the prices are MUCH closer.
Quick thought, what if the price increase is there to compensate for the fact that snow leopard will be a free upgrade?
Think about that.
+1A disclaimer. I spend a lot of money when I buy a computer. Expensive hardware isn't a problem. But the idea is that I get what I pay for. Q6700 for $250, fair. 8800GTX, $600, fair. The computer that used to be in my signature was more than $2,000 when I built it (Q6700, 8800GTX, 2 x 250GB, 3GB, 680i board, etc), and it has been worth the money. Apple's "Pro" computer is at least $700 too expensive for what it really is, and it shows.
1. a better built machine, 2. good customer service, 3. an expandable unit without digging through wires and just a 4. more reliable machine.
Also... the dell isnt a Xeon processor, arent those more reliable and better built long term?