Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
PM me about prices on those displays, the dells are really nice. Good to see a Mac Pro for under £1k, and super fast too.
 
Upgrade rom 7300 to 8800

Hello,

I have a 2006 Mac Pro with 2.66's and can honestly say it is still a great machine. It is still plenty fast in all of the things I like to do, Final Cut pro CS4 suite and such. I bought mine with the X1900XT video card and then just recently put a 8800GT graphics card in it due to gaming on bootcamp. I think these machines still have plenty of life left in them.

Good luck with whatever you choose to do.

Hello Waremaster...sounds like we have a similar setup, I was wondering if you had any issues flashing your 8800GT? I am trying to upgrade my 7300GT to two EVGA e-GeForce 8800GT w512MB (P/N:512-P3-N802-AR). I followed the 8800 EFI32 ROM post and used the ROM in post#53...I was able to successfully flash the cards boot and they work fine in a Windows PC on a Intel based machine. When remove the factory 7300GT and I install one into my Mac Pro (MA356LL/A with 2 - Dual Core 2.66GHz Xeon, 8GB RAM, stock 7300GT w256MB) plug in the power cable to the back of the 8800GT, the Mac Pro boots but I have no picture at all. It appears to boot all the way into OSx 10.5.6, but no picture? I assume I have missed something, but I am not sure what...I reviewed the previous posts and unless I missed it, I didn't see anything I missed...I will continue to review unless I hear something...thanks again for the help.
 
hehe I just ran across twenty four ProLiant BL460c server blades with 4GB RAM, 36GB 10K RPM drives, and two x5365 xeons all for $550 each. I'm sooooo tempted to buy them all! :D

:-O $550?? How? Where? Buy them for us and ship them!! Now.... how much are flights to Japan......
 
Wow $200 for the L246WH over here the cheapest I can get one of those for is £300 on amazon! I got the W2442PA for £210, it was a little wide at first but I have got used to the 16:9 aspect and it is actually pretty good for films etc.
It serves me fine for aperture and casual movies in iMovie however it may get downgraded soon to be on a mac mini for home theatre in the bedroom and Ill pick up a suitable graphics card for my 08 MP and get the 24" cinema display.

I quickly found it to be the perfect format! I'm so glad I didn't go for a 4:3! It's even improved my Quake 3 & 4 abilities. :D


:eek: Busted! :D

I still like Eizo, but they've gotten too expensive these days. :( I took a look at one I was interested in. Then I saw the $5K+ price. :eek:

So I settled for a refurbed NEC 2490 for less than $800USD, including an extended warranty and shipping. :) It took a little getting used to, and a few calibrations, but it's fine. Fewer headaches at least. :p

Actually, it doesn't even classify as a headache. Seriously it's just a very minor annoyance which I can't even detect but a few times a year. And it really is "good enough" for professional photography. The banding only appears in compressed computer generated gradients. The once or twice I saw it in a sky shot it was easily solved by adding noise - which doesn't show up in even the highest quality printing.

The inherent angular color shift isn't really a problem either unless the operator is the kind of person who bobs their head all over the place while editing or something. At 50cm from the monitor I have about a 20x10cm window where the color is right on. And that's where my head is al the time anyway so. The only issue I have is that I have to tilt the monitor downward when there's crowd here watching movies from the floor (Japanese style). Easily solved by my 3rd party monitor stand tho:



Which gives me 180˚ rotation at the monitor mount axis in both X and Y plus the arms radial movement.​


Ha ha... In looking for a shot of my stand I came across this: http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?p=5984667 This guy thinks like I do. He has more time (and less wood working skillz) than I tho. :)


.
 
Actually, it doesn't even classify as a headache. Seriously it's just a very minor annoyance which I can't even detect but a few times a year. And it really is "good enough" for professional photography. The banding only appears in compressed computer generated gradients. The once or twice I saw it in a sky shot it was easily solved by adding noise - which doesn't show up in even the highest quality printing.
In my case, "headache" is literal. :( Eye strain...:rolleyes:

The inherent angular color shift isn't really a problem either unless the operator is the kind of person who bobs their head all over the place while editing or something. At 50cm from the monitor I have about a 20x10cm window where the color is right on. And that's where my head is al the time anyway so. The only issue I have is that I have to tilt the monitor downward when there's crowd here watching movies from the floor (Japanese style). Easily solved by my 3rd party monitor stand tho:

Ha ha... In looking for a shot of my stand I came across this: http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?p=5984667 This guy thinks like I do. He has more time (and less wood working skillz) than I tho. :)
I've done a few DIY projects. ;) Still do. :) Unfortunately, I lack some of the tools ATM. Garage is being used for storage, so I need to put up a building first so I have a place to put them. :p Not an inexpensive proposition, so it'll have to wait awhile.
 
In my case, "headache" is literal. :( Eye strain...:rolleyes:

Eyestrain? Is there any difference at all between the two besides the 6-bit + dithering (bit depth) and the max viewing angle? I mean sure the TN refreshes faster but I can't tell any image quality differences between this and the ColorEdge if my TNs are adjusted right for the environment and all. Also it's not a full-frame refresh if I read it right, but more like GEL or PEL refreshes - so it wouldn't flicker or anything AFAIK.

In the shops I can't tell for sure when side by side because they have that ultra bright shop lighting and the Brightness / Contrast of most or all of the monitors are set to 100% and uncalibrated too.
 
Eyestrain? Is there any difference at all between the two besides the 6-bit + dithering (bit depth) and the max viewing angle? I mean sure the TN refreshes faster but I can't tell any image quality differences between this and the ColorEdge if my TNs are adjusted right for the environment and all. Also it's not a full-frame refresh if I read it right, but more like GEL or PEL refreshes - so it wouldn't flicker or anything AFAIK.

In the shops I can't tell for sure when side by side because they have that ultra bright shop lighting and the Brightness / Contrast of most or all of the monitors are set to 100% and uncalibrated too.
For CRT's, the refresh rate seemed to cause me the most grief. With LCD's, the backlighting and calibration seems to make more of a difference as the refresh has a limit of 60Hz. Apparently, I can live with it. ;) I hadn't spent a lot of time in front of S-PVA (or other PVA panels), so I can't say if they would make any difference for you. That said, the Eizo (S-PVA) I saw looked really good, but was still more expensive than the NEC's street price, new factory sealed with an IPS panel. I do notice that it has a red shift on a black screen if I'm not looking directly at it (mild angle), particularly in the lower left corner. But it isn't bad, and doesn't really bother me. I've discovered a set of either dead pixels, or a plastic flake wedged between the panel and the backlight, but it's not directly where I look, and is small enough not to be that bad. Even on a white background. (It shows up in the address line in a browser, on the left side).

I can't really tell anything between models on display in stores either. I ended up buying the NEC by reputation, reviews, and past experience, as there wasn't any place local that carried them. Ultimately, I got lucky. :D :p
 
Hello Waremaster...sounds like we have a similar setup, I was wondering if you had any issues flashing your 8800GT? I am trying to upgrade my 7300GT to two EVGA e-GeForce 8800GT w512MB (P/N:512-P3-N802-AR). I followed the 8800 EFI32 ROM post and used the ROM in post#53...I was able to successfully flash the cards boot and they work fine in a Windows PC on a Intel based machine. When remove the factory 7300GT and I install one into my Mac Pro (MA356LL/A with 2 - Dual Core 2.66GHz Xeon, 8GB RAM, stock 7300GT w256MB) plug in the power cable to the back of the 8800GT, the Mac Pro boots but I have no picture at all. It appears to boot all the way into OSx 10.5.6, but no picture? I assume I have missed something, but I am not sure what...I reviewed the previous posts and unless I missed it, I didn't see anything I missed...I will continue to review unless I hear something...thanks again for the help.

That is interesting. I would be curious what command you used when you flashed the card. And I would also like to verify that you did the graphics update that came out just prior to 10.5.5. Let me know.
 
Flashing 8800GT no Picture on Boot

That is interesting. I would be curious what command you used when you flashed the card. And I would also like to verify that you did the graphics update that came out just prior to 10.5.5. Let me know.

I used nvflash.exe -4 -5 -6 mp8800gt.rom, it successfully reads the existing flash...and loads the new one.

The only graphics update I could find initially was the nvidia 10.5.2, but it said "This computer does not need this update." I am currently running 10.5.6...and I have applied every patch via the update utility.
 
For CRT's, the refresh rate seemed to cause me the most grief. With LCD's, the backlighting and calibration seems to make more of a difference as the refresh has a limit of 60Hz. Apparently, I can live with it. ;) I hadn't spent a lot of time in front of S-PVA (or other PVA panels), so I can't say if they would make any difference for you. That said, the Eizo (S-PVA) I saw looked really good, but was still more expensive than the NEC's street price, new factory sealed with an IPS panel. I do notice that it has a red shift on a black screen if I'm not looking directly at it (mild angle), particularly in the lower left corner. But it isn't bad, and doesn't really bother me. I've discovered a set of either dead pixels, or a plastic flake wedged between the panel and the backlight, but it's not directly where I look, and is small enough not to be that bad. Even on a white background. (It shows up in the address line in a browser, on the left side).

I can't really tell anything between models on display in stores either. I ended up buying the NEC by reputation, reviews, and past experience, as there wasn't any place local that carried them. Ultimately, I got lucky. :D :p


You have dead pixels? Bummer! None here. I had some o n one of the screens but then through a process of reading and discovery used a vacuum cleaner with a sock over it to pull gently on the face of the screen. No more dead pixels. :)

The first clue into this process was when the salesman volunteered that they will replace a screen with dead pixels but not if it is caused by the user applying pressure or hitting the screen with a pencil. I thought that was really weird of him to say. About the 3rd time I cleaned the monitor two showed up.

I think this is proof enough that sometimes sucking at something can be a good thing! :D
 
You have dead pixels? Bummer! None here. I had some o n one of the screens but then through a process of reading and discovery used a vacuum cleaner with a sock over it to pull gently on the face of the screen. No more dead pixels. :)

The first clue into this process was when the salesman volunteered that they will replace a screen with dead pixels but not if it is caused by the user applying pressure or hitting the screen with a pencil. I thought that was really weird of him to say. About the 3rd time I cleaned the monitor two showed up.

I think this is proof enough that sometimes sucking at something can be a good thing! :D
:cool: I'll have to try that. :D
I didn't think that would have worked, or worse, cause damage. :eek: :eek:

If it's just a spec of trash (on the bulb perhaps), I'll have to open it up and find it. :) Might be worth a look anyway. :p
 
Well, if you have any apprehension about it at all. Don't do it. Go on your gut - it's probably right. Besides that sounds a little different. Mine was not a dark spec but rather an over-bright cyan cell. One was red, one was cyan. Subsequent cleanings would turn them on momentarily again too. :D
 
hi, thought I'd ask my simple question here rather than start a new thread.

I just bought a 2006 2 Ghz , 1.5G ram. When I start the computer it seems pretty fast. What I'd like to speed up is the time it takes from first clicking say, iTunes or some other basic program. Currently for maybe a few seconds I get the beach ball swirl and then it opens. I'm hoping it's just a ram thing?

Would installing leopard make a difference too?

I am encouraged by the comments here regarding that it is still a good computer. I got it for my kids to muck around on to keep them off my main computer!

Thanks
 
hi, thought I'd ask my simple question here rather than start a new thread.

I just bought a 2006 2 Ghz , 1.5G ram. When I start the computer it seems pretty fast. What I'd like to speed up is the time it takes from first clicking say, iTunes or some other basic program. Currently for maybe a few seconds I get the beach ball swirl and then it opens. I'm hoping it's just a ram thing?

Would installing leopard make a difference too?

I am encouraged by the comments here regarding that it is still a good computer. I got it for my kids to muck around on to keep them off my main computer!

Thanks

Isn't that an access speed issue? Grabbing a faster internal hard drive might hurry things up there. What I think I'll do to get a better performance is install the OS and Apps on a SSD.

Also if your current disk is filled to capacity things may start running slower. I don't know if OSX Leopard would make too much of a difference, as long as you're on the latest version of all the software. Could do.
 
I used nvflash.exe -4 -5 -6 mp8800gt.rom, it successfully reads the existing flash...and loads the new one.

The only graphics update I could find initially was the nvidia 10.5.2, but it said "This computer does not need this update." I am currently running 10.5.6...and I have applied every patch via the update utility.

I would suggest trying to reflash the card with the following command.

nvflash --index=1 -4 -5 -6 mp8800gt.rom and see if that makes any difference.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.