Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

adam9c1

macrumors 68000
Original poster
May 2, 2012
1,893
315
Chicagoland
Which will be faster?

4th gen Time Capsule
Or
2006 Mac Mini 1.83 upgraded to 2.0

I need to run a Time Machine Server for few clients.

Edit: maybe the mini is 2007. I'll have to check specs..

The 3.5" drive is a WD Green.
 
Last edited:
I would remove the optical drive and install hard drive caddy (data doubler), then cut out a hole in chassis to route sata power and data cables to outside. I have a dummy empty mini chassis that this 3.5 drive would hide in.
 
What I ment to understand is what device has more "processing horsepower" for TM service.
Each device would be wired to a unmanaged gigabit switch.

Perhaps someone else can chime in. Thanks for the input Lucas.
 
What I ment to understand is what device has more "processing horsepower" for TM service.
Each device would be wired to a unmanaged gigabit switch.

Perhaps someone else can chime in. Thanks for the input Lucas.
You won't see a difference with Time Machine performance on either. It's purely a matter of disk and network performance. Effectively all the CPU load happens at the client end.
There's a lot less configuration and work involved to use the Time Capsule for backup, so I'd just use that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A Hobo
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.