My bet, though, is that you'll hit the buy button at WWDC (MacWorld Summer 2007). A couple of months of your girlfriend's MacIntel laptop creaming your Quad G5 will send you over the edge...
lol, that's a good guess.
My bet, though, is that you'll hit the buy button at WWDC (MacWorld Summer 2007). A couple of months of your girlfriend's MacIntel laptop creaming your Quad G5 will send you over the edge...
Her MacBook cream my Quad G5? I don't think so.In other words, you don't even need a quad core MacIntel - since you're willing to run the PowerPC for another half year.
My bet, though, is that you'll hit the buy button at WWDC (MacWorld Summer 2007). A couple of months of your girlfriend's MacIntel laptop creaming your Quad G5 will send you over the edge...
That's the $64 quesiton isn't it? Is SS really that much further out? I thought it was supposed to be out by now already.So is the general concensus that the Mac Pro's will get a GPU update at WWDC? But nothing major like S-S upgrade till october or january08.
WWDC will be an update to mac books and imacs?
Not on the multi-threaded workflow, but BareFeats shows the MacBooks beating the Quad on some individual tasks (like iMovie)....Her MacBook cream my Quad G5? I don't think so.(![]()
Sooner or later, you'll realize that the Quad G5 has become a dinosaur that isn't worth its carbon footprint.![]()
Sick him, Multimedia!![]()
Wow.... (And just the regular "Wow" - not the "Wow" of the Vista ad campaign...)
MM is speechless. Maybe the thought that the low-end "consumer" MacIntel laptop is faster than the quad G5 has him inching closer to that "buy button"...
Not really. When I look at the lowest 9GB ram $6,000 price tag for nothing new except the 8 cores, I tell myself that I can limp along for another 6 months, if necessary, to get a 2007 motherboard and new graphics card options with Leopard. While it would help me to have it now, I guess I can do without it meantime. While I think I need it, it's not a make or break thing yet for me. The Leopard delay makes me want to delay this purchase as well. While I appreciate your encouragement for me to buy now, I'm not persuaded now is the right time for me.Wow.... (And just the regular "Wow" - not the "Wow" of the Vista ad campaign...)
MM is speechless. Maybe the thought that the low-end "consumer" MacIntel laptop is faster than the quad G5 has him inching closer to that "buy button"...
Not on the multi-threaded workflow, but BareFeats shows the MacBooks beating the Quad on some individual tasks (like iMovie)....
Since After Effects CS3 is performing wonders on the 8-Core..
http://www.barefeats.com/octopro4.html
One question.. Apple takes back computers (trades) then sells'em refurbished right? Is it a decent option when upgrading to a new computer with them?
Does anyone know when the SS motherboard and real octo core CPU's will be released from Intel?
Well, one would hope that Apple will learn from this "fake octo" fiasco that if you don't ship new Intel kit close to day 1, you may as well not ship it.
Waiting five months before updating to Intel's current product just means that you're so close to the next revision that anyone who isn't desperate will wait for the upgrade. Intel's roadmap is public and frequently updated - Apple's old policy of secrecy is no longer viable.
I agree but I don't think Apple is going to change their way of doing business.
They are spread too thin with too many devices these days.
I have a feeling that Apple will be perfectly content with releasing product 2 - 3 months after Dell, HP, or Sony. The primary difference will be OS X and aesthetically pleasing design.
Having said all that, WHEN IS Intel releasing the Stoakley motherboard? I don't know the model number and I can't find a reference to Stoakley or Seaburg anywhere on their site.
That's the $64 quesiton isn't it? Is SS really that much further out? I thought it was supposed to be out by now already.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Does anyone know when the SS motherboard and real octo core CPU's will be released from Intel?
I think he was referring to the penryn chips as the current form of quad chip seems to be referred to as 2 taped together dual chips & that the Penryns architecture was that of a true quad chip, & Better able to handle instructions, & Throughput. I am hoping for the penryn also, for the same reasons, as well as that's when I will be able to afford it.