Mac Pro 2008 Upgrade
Why didn't you like the 680? I just saw a thread on here regarding that card and was considering an upgrade to that.
Im going to do some more tests on the card and I will inform you about the results.
So far I got this comparison between GTX 285 1GB; GT120 and GTX 680 4GB:
Open CL - CPU + GPU for GTX 285 = 571
Open CL - CPU + GPU for GTX 680 = 1062
Open CL - CPU + GPU for GT 120 = 735
Open CL - GPU for GTX 285 = 268
Open CL - GPU for GTX 680 = 756
Open CL - GPU for GT 120 = 318
I have the feeling these numbers do not mean so much as I believe that the performance
of GTX 285 was way better than of GT120, however according to LuxMark score it looks different.
I added SSD disc to my setup and that's really amazing how you can make the things fly. Now my apps load three times faster than before.
I had GTX 285 1GB and now I have GTX 680 4 GB in my machine.
The benchmarks in Lux Mark are three times higher for GTX 680 as you can see above, but I cant tell you now what will be performance. Its just very recent upgrade.
The card supports both: OpenCL and CUDA, so from the sound of it may be good choice for people who use FCPX and latest Premiere Pro CC or After Effects.
Now Im adding USB 3.0 ports to my Mac Pro, but my external drives support USB 2.0 / eSata and firewire 800. Do you know if I can use any usb 3.0 to esata adapters or I need specific ones?
I bought this cable
http://www.newertech.com/products/esata_cable.php
to add eSata ports to my Mac, but it doesn't work at all, however Im using cables, which are 0,5 metres (recommended).
__________________
Mac Pro 3.1, 8 core 2.8 Xeon, 16 GB RAM, GTX 680 4GB, Samsung Pro SSD 256 GB (boot drive); SSD 64GB (media storage), WD Studio Edition 2TB (FireWire 800 /eSata drive) + WD Studio Edition 1TB (FireWire 800 /eSata drive); USB 3.0 docking station; 23" Apple Cinema Display, Mac OS X 10.8.3.