Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, I figured that since I have 2 1TB Samsung F1 drives on an early 2008 MP, I had better do my part and post xbench stats as well.

I run OS X & Apps on one of my 1TB drives, Boot Camp (Vista x-64) on the other 1TB Samsung, an old WD 500GB for Time Machine, and stock 320GB holds my VMware Fusion images.
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.png
    Picture 1.png
    71.6 KB · Views: 95
Here's mine:

4 x 1TB Seagate ES2 in RAID 5. Now I wonder what the scores would be using all 4 in RAID 0 on the Apple card!?!?
 

Attachments

  • Picture 4.jpg
    Picture 4.jpg
    72.2 KB · Views: 75
Well, I figured that since I have 2 1TB Samsung F1 drives on an early 2008 MP, I had better do my part and post xbench stats as well.

I run OS X & Apps on one of my 1TB drives, Boot Camp (Vista x-64) on the other 1TB Samsung, an old WD 500GB for Time Machine, and stock 320GB holds my VMware Fusion images.

I'm going to add an xbench on my stock 320GB just for grins...
 

Attachments

  • Picture 2.png
    Picture 2.png
    70.7 KB · Views: 74
3 x 750GB F1 in RAID 0

Finally got my MP! Here's my contribution before I start moving files over from my iMac. :D

Test%201.jpg
 
I wonder why all these newer, larger drives seem to be getting lower Sequential Uncached Read 4K block scores. That stock 320 got 27 MB/s and my G5 Quad's stock 250GB drive (nearly full) gets 33 MB/s. Judging from people's overall impressions, though, I'd guess that particular statistic doesn't matter too much in real-world usage.

Me, I've been drooling over anyone's benchmark that got more than 1MB/s in random uncached 4K read... :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.