what i dont understand is i used to have the old black macbook, and on the second battery i put it in it i got almost 4 hours and that was running things like Final Cut and watching movies
That battery lasted almost two years and performed more or less consistently like that the whole time until i sold it. (interestingly a week later it completely died and the computer couldnt even recognize it was installed...)
Whereas the battery before that died early and basically sucked from day one. Oh and by the way, those removable batteries were
advertised at around 4 hours and to actually get 4 hours wasnt bad at all
My conclusion was that rechargeable batteries in general are an inconsistent/unreliable technology, and some times you get lucky and sometimes you dont. Anyway everything since then has only supported this idea.
But at present i am using a new 13" MBP 2010 and trying to make sense of the battery. In the case of my old one it more or less delivered 4 hours almost irrespective of what i was doing, heavy or light. BUt this one is so so volatile. I tested it last night and saw that if I would have used 1/4 screen light and text edit with moderate web browsing I could have gotten 8 to 9 hours. I must say that is pretty good, but what i dont understand is that if it can perform like that for light jobs you would also think that it could increase performance for heavy jobs. But my experience has been that it is futile for heavy jobs, giving 2 to 2.5 hours with full light,watching movies (vlc/QT), airport on, youtube, etc. ( I havent even started doing video work again i.e editing, rendering, etc.

)
So its still pretty screwy if you ask me. I am still debating whether I will try to get apple to do something. I know they will drag their feet and complain from my previous experiences ....