2011 iMac speculation

Discussion in 'iMac' started by Opspin, Feb 27, 2011.

  1. Opspin macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    #1
    [​IMG]

    Apple will get rid of the chin below the iMac to match the size and (slightly thinner) look of the CinemaDisplay, which will also get an update to support ThunderBolt. The size will stay at 27".

    The CinemaDisplay will get an update to give it an extra Thunderbolt port to daisychain more devices (which will also have two Thunderbolt ports for daisy-chaining) and you'll be able to use two extra cinema displays along with your iMac for a total of 3 displays. The CinemaDisplay will further get rid of the USB in their squid cable because this is supported through the Thunderbolt connection (at least when all the MacBooks have been updated to Thunderbolt).

    Apple will work with intel to secure the first batch of their new 6 core Sandy Bridge i7 CPU's. Reserving the single and dual octocore i7 processors for the Mac Pro but still making the top iMac model compete with all but the fastest current gen Mac Pro's. Obviously the graphic card will also get an update to facilitate the optional extra display.

    At least the high end iMac's will get a flash storage in addition to the normal 3.5" harddrive to hold the OS and programs/apps, the price should now have gone down enough to make it cheaper to just solder some flash storage onto the motherboard than an awkward 2.5" SSD installation in a cramped computer.

    Most other improvements will be from Lion.
     
  2. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #2
    There won't be 6-core Sandy Bridge CPUs until Q4 2011 and those will likely be too hot for iMacs (130W).
     
  3. Mitchel macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    #3
    I really hope you're right about Apple removing the "chin" below the screen.
     
  4. ayzee macrumors 6502a

    ayzee

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    #4
    That mock-up new iMac screen looks real nice. the rumours point to a bezel change so this Is certainly a possibility
     
  5. .Max. macrumors member

    .Max.

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Location:
    United Kindom
    #5
    It is real..... its an apple cinema display lol



    Sent from my HTC Vision
     
  6. MoreAwesomeDanU macrumors regular

    MoreAwesomeDanU

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    #6
    hahahahaha
     
  7. Opspin thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    #7
    Thanks, as someone already pointed out, it's a CinemaDisplay*3 but as the iMac will likely be the same, I just used that.

    That's what I found out on Wikipedia but I thought 130–80/<80 W meant some variations less than 80W making it feasible.

    So Hellhammer, when are we going to see hexacore iMacs?
     
  8. Hellhammer, Feb 27, 2011
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2011

    Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #8
    Intel's current i7-9xx lineup consists of 130W CPUs. There are Xeons which have lower TDP but they also cost a lot more and are meant for DP systems. It is possible that there will be CPUs suitable for iMacs but I still would not expect Apple to use them because they will most likely be fairly expensive. Moreover, Ivy Bridge should be out quite soon after the release of high-end SBs and I would expect iMacs to get hexa core then.
     
  9. Opspin thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    #9
    You definitely know your CPU's :)

    DP systems? Double processor? like the Mac Pro?

    Do you mean iMac's will get hexacores with Ivy Bridge? there's already a quad core iMac now of course.

    So what is your prediction for the next iMac? What will come first? a double processor iMac or a hexacore?
     
  10. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #10
    Yeah, DP stands for dual processor.

    Yeah, my bad, it was a brainfart :eek: Ivy Birdge should bring hexacore to iMac.

    Code:
    1199$ 21.5" iMac
    
    Intel Core i3-2100 (3.1GHz)
    AMD 65xxM with 256MB GDDR5
    500GB HD
    2x2GB RAM; option for 4x2GB
    
    1499$ 21.5" iMac
    
    Intel Core i3-2120 (3.3GHz); option for Core i5-2500S (2.7/3.7GHz)
    AMD 67xxM with 512MB GDDR5
    1TB HD; option for 2TB
    2x2GB RAM: option for 4x2GB
    
    1699$ 27" iMac
    
    Intel Core i3-2120 (3.3GHz)
    AMD 67xxM with 512MB GDDR5; option for AMD 6950M with 1024MB GDDR5
    1TB HD; option for 2TB
    2x2GB RAM; options for 4x2GB, 2x4GB and 4x4GB
    
    1999$ 27" iMac
    
    Intel Core i5-2500 (3.3/3.7GHz); option for Core i7-2600 (3.4/3.8GHz)
    AMD 6950M with 1024MB GDDR5
    1TB HD; option for 2TB
    2x4GB RAM; option for 4x4GB
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=11688279&postcount=26

    I should add Thunderbolt to that though.

    DP iMac, probably never as that is what Mac Pro is for and DP systems require a lot space. Hexacore should come in early 2012.
     
  11. zedsdead macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    #11
    Apple will not get rid of the chin yet, because they can't. They already spent time reducing its size recently, and they clearly need it for components.

    The next iMac refresh will be a spec bump similar to that of the Macbook Pro. Look at Hellhammer's specs, plus a Thunderbolt Port.

    When Ivy Bridge hex-cores come though, then we might see something new. I will likely upgrade again until that point. I am dying to get an SSD into my iMac though...my Macbook Air and Pro's over the past few years have spoiled me. We shall see.
     
  12. Opspin thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    #12
    But if the iMac refresh is only a spec bump, will it not lag somewhat behind the MacBook Pros? Or merely be about as fast?

    And what to they need the chin for? I can't see what's down there that can't be moved a little, one would thing that Steve Jobs saw it as paramount to match the iMac up with the CinemaDisplays, someone mentioned the speakers taking up a lot of space, fair enough, but they don't look all that big to me in the teardown. I'd rather have an iMac half a centimeter thicker than have a chin.

    What about the extra SSD drive? will it become a chip?
     
  13. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #13
    How come? Spec bump means it will get faster CPU, GPU etc. but no design or other major changes. Desktop CPUs and high-end mobility GPUs are much faster than what MBP has.

    MBPs didn't take the mSATA approach so I would assume the SSD will remain as normal 2.5" in iMac.
     
  14. Opspin thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    #14
    How disappointing, I was hoping it was the cool future but instead it's just the lame old present :(
     
  15. flipster macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2010
    Location:
    Boston
    #15
    It's the thinnest, cleanest, and best looking all-in- one computer for a great price (27").

    They can't get rid of the chin due to space issues (ex. ram slots, speakers). Besides, I like the chin, it gives the iMac definition, and it would look to much like the cinema display without it.

    Only thing where gonna see changed is a thunderbolt port, a faster cpu, and a better gpu (all i really care about, anyway).

    If they could make one design change to it though, I'd definitely take the black borders off and stretch the screen to the edge of the computer (would be problem for the isight though). It would look sexy with an edge to edge screen though.
     
  16. wacomme macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    #16
    Would Thunderbolt provide a viable third-party SSD option for the iMacs?
     
  17. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #17
    At 10Gb/s, hell yeah. We just need to wait for drives and enclosure with TB
     
  18. TMRaven macrumors 68020

    TMRaven

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #18
    I don't want apple taking away the chin of the iMacs. The chin is what makes them look good-- the cinema displays on the other hand, do not look that good.
     
  19. mrsir2009 macrumors 604

    mrsir2009

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #19
    Hell, people thought the iMac was a monitor several years ago when they had massive chins. With no chin there will be no doubt that its a monitor :p
     
  20. Pachang macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    #20
    You can't daisy chain two 24bit colour 27" ( 2560x1440@60hz ) over one thunderbolt port (10gbps) on the iMac. It would require two thunderbolt ports on the iMac. This makes two external 27" displays on the iMac impossible unless there is two ports.
     
  21. iSayuSay macrumors 68030

    iSayuSay

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    #21
    For me .. no chin .. no buy

    On next $1999 iMac i'd speculate:

    1. Intel i7 Sandy Bridge 3.4Ghz
    2. ATI Radeon HD 6970 1Gb DDR5
    3. For the same price, 2TB HDD or 1TB HDD + 128 Gb SSD (maybe onboard)
    4. 8Gb DDR RAM
    5. Preinstalled OSX Lion + iLife 11
    6. 2 Thunderbolt port, 1 FW800, 4 USB
    7. Wireless keyboard now come with numeric pad + Magic Mouse
     
  22. admanimal macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    #22
    I'd like to see them trash the optical drive in favor of other components and/or some exterior design changes. I'm pretty certain this will happen in the next couple of years, but it could be sooner rather than later.
     
  23. skarstein macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    #23
    Hey guys, Just wondering.

    If i buy myself the 1699$ 27" i3 iMac now and apple decides to update their iMacs very soon. Will be bee seeing SSD drives as standard, and what about the price. Will it stay at 1699$ for the same iMac Model with SSD`s?
     
  24. dr Dunkel macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    #24
    If the refreshes are coming anytime soon, the 6970M should absolutely be an option. Anything less would be plain wrong...
     
  25. coryndiego macrumors regular

    coryndiego

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Location:
    San Diego, Ca.
    #25
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Wait or spend 200 more on a refurbished 27" i7quad 2.93. Youll be getting way more bang for your buck and a better graphics card for the huge display.... Or wait and get a new and even faster iMac for same $$.

    Although, $1899.0 is a good price.

    http://store.apple.com/us/product/G0JP0LL/A?mco=MjEwNTcxMTY
     

Share This Page