2011 Macbook Air with 2gb ram ok for $400?

Discussion in 'MacBook Air' started by everlong24, Feb 15, 2015.

  1. everlong24 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    #1
    I've been offered one locally, but I'm concerned about the ram. I'll be using it for browsing and streaming videos.
     
  2. Ulenspiegel macrumors 68020

    Ulenspiegel

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Location:
    Land of Flanders and Elsewhere
    #2
    For what you have mentioned, you will be ok with 2GB of RAM.
    Nevertheless would be nice to know what OS version the MBA's running.
     
  3. everlong24 thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    #3
    Mavericks I believe.

    He said he didn't like Yosemite. I'm on an i3-4130 with 4gb ram right now on windows 8.1, and I'm perfectly happy with it so hopefully it can be comparable.
     
  4. Ulenspiegel macrumors 68020

    Ulenspiegel

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Location:
    Land of Flanders and Elsewhere
    #4
    It will be enough for your purposes.
    It is good news that he did not install Yosemite.
     
  5. Altemose macrumors G3

    Altemose

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Location:
    Elkton, Maryland
    #5
    For machines limited to 2 GB of RAM I recommend either Snow Leopard or Mavericks/Yosemite. Snow Leopard's RAM footprint is much smaller than newer versions, and Mavericks and Yosemite introduced a lot of RAM management technology like Memory Pressure.
     
  6. FuNGi macrumors 65816

    FuNGi

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Location:
    California
    #6
    If you treat it like an iPad browsing in Safari then you'll be fine. Just close apps when you switch to new ones.
     
  7. kelon111, Feb 23, 2015
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2015

    kelon111 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    #7
    I wouldn't buy it but if you pretend that it's the year 2005 , that 2 GB of RAM will get you far.

    Don't open too many tabs in Firefox , Safari , etc. and don't try to do too much multitasking.
     
  8. Meister Suspended

    Meister

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    #8
    This is not necessary.
    You can open as many tabs as you like.


    No worries.
    It will easily do those tasks and much more.
     
  9. Dsching Suspended

    Dsching

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2014
    #9
    The 2011 Macbook Air still works like a charm.
    Those who say different don't know what they are talking about.
     
  10. powerbook911 macrumors 68040

    powerbook911

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    #10
    I will take it to another level. I started using my 2010 11.6 Air more recently. 1.4 C2D and 2GB of RAM.

    I do think it was a bit silly of Apple as I paid $200 extra that year to get 128GB of storage. If you paid for the non-entry model, they could have thrown in 4GB total.

    However, it's a nice little machine. I've been leaving it turned on most of the day this past week so it can do some housekeeping, and it has made it get faster.

    For a lot of things like opening Safari, working with office documents, etc. it still feels faster than many people's hard drive machines. Plus, with a 11.6 inch screen, how many Apps will you open at once?

    The 2011 machine is MUCH faster. I was going to upgrade way back in 2011, but I wanted to keep the 920M at the time.

    It's a beautiful machine, using it more again, it has me considering upgrading this Spring, but at the same time, the 2GB hurts resale value quite a bit despite it working quite well.


    Oh, I run Yosemite too.
     
  11. Meister Suspended

    Meister

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    #11
    The OP wants to buy, not sell.
    I know that the 2011 2gb still handles everything you throw at it just fine.
    The people spreading nonsense like that you have to "close tabs" have no clue.
     
  12. powerbook911, Feb 23, 2015
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2015

    powerbook911 macrumors 68040

    powerbook911

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    #12
    I certainly agree regrading not needing to close tabs. I've purposely stayed on my 2010 air with 2GB of RAM and purposely kept opening tabs and additional applications. It is fine for these uses. A 2011 would only be leagues better.

    I apologize for mentioning the resale value. I only mention it, as it is important to some people here. As mine functions fine I go back in 2010, I really only regret Apple not having a stock 4GB machine because of resale value.

    Of course, this benefits those buying tremendously! A 2011 machine with a better price due to 2GB can be attractive.

    I have about 10 things open right now including a second desktop with 2GB.

    I think the 2011 machine could work well for the OP too. I suppose one could always develop new requirements out of a machine and could have used more RAM then, but I'm doing these same tasks as the OP right now with a less powerful machine on the 2GB of RAM.
     
  13. kelon111 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    #13
    Well , it depends on the content of the page. If I'm not mistaken , having a bunch of pages with Flash content does slow down a computer with little RAM quite a bit.
     
  14. Meister Suspended

    Meister

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    #14
    No, it doesn't.
     
  15. sracer macrumors 603

    sracer

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Location:
    Land of Bongos and Beatniks
    #15
    2011 MBA, 2GB RAM, $400? Not a good deal IMO.

    Last Summer I bought a brand new 2014 MBA 4GB RAM for $650 @ Best Buy (before additional incentives/deals... out the door for a total of $450 taxes included)
     
  16. powerbook911 macrumors 68040

    powerbook911

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    #16
    Wow. That is a terrific deal. I will keep an eye out for that happening again.
     
  17. keysofanxiety macrumors 604

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #17
    2GB RAM just isn't enough. Sure, the SSD will compensate for the RAM bottleneck (when it's writing to the SSD as virtual memory), but 2GB RAM just isn't enough to ensure any sort of system longevity.
     
  18. Meister Suspended

    Meister

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    #18
    Nonsense.
     
  19. keysofanxiety macrumors 604

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #19
    With a comment like that, I suspect you're one of those really dangerous computer users who knows just a little bit, but bashes around on the Internet, stating hogwash like that and giving people poor advice.

    Because of your arrogance, and ignorance, people run the risk of purchasing machines that will be counterproductive to their needs. OS X sings on more RAM. And 2GB RAM is a massive bottleneck in 2015 - never mind in a few years' time.
     
  20. Meister Suspended

    Meister

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    #20
    It's a used macbook, not a major future investment.
    For browsing and word editing (and even much more) however it will still last several years and in the end RAM will not be the bottleneck.
     
  21. keysofanxiety macrumors 604

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #21
    On a system with soldered RAM that you can't upgrade later, that's immediately a problem. Systems page with 2GB RAM when just using Safari so I think it's fair to say that could be considered a bottleneck.

    And yes it's a used MacBook, but it's still a lot of money - and if you're sinking that sort of cash, I don't know anybody who would recommend 2GB. That's the absolute minimum Apple recommend just to run the OS.

    In my experience, 4GB RAM is an acceptable minimum for general use.

    ----------

    Definitely not much more. Not even a 'little more'. I simply can't comprehend how you think 2GB RAM is suitable for OS X. Acceptable with an SSD? I'll give you that. It will run, but it won't be the smoothest experience.

    But try to simultaneously run 6+ tabs in Safari with 2GB RAM, or even touch an Adobe application/DAW, you're going on a one-way trip to Lag City.
     
  22. joshlalonde, Feb 24, 2015
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2015

    joshlalonde macrumors 6502

    joshlalonde

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2014
    Location:
    Canada
    #22
    I have to agree with Meister, saying that it's not suitable because it only has 2GB of RAM is complete nonsense.

    It may be that 2GB of RAM is not favorable for modern computers, but do you honestly think that when the '11 MBA came out, it was completely slow and unusable as you portray it to be?

    It's still an Apple computer you know...

    It was good then, and it's still usable now.
    Also, you forgetting that he DOESNT have Yosemite installed. Meaning, the RAM requirements are not 2GB minimum, but whatever RAM requirements are on the OS he's running. I suspect it runs Snow Leopard, but I'm not a long-time Apple user.
     
  23. Meister Suspended

    Meister

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    #23
    I did. No lag.
    Please post photo / video prove that a macbook air 2011 with 2gb RAM lags with a 10 or whatever Safari tabs open!
    And yes, you can run Photoshop, too.

    Let me start with a little video of a mba 2010, multitasking itunes, ibooks, safari, notepad, maps, open office, calendar, mail and contacts

     
  24. keysofanxiety macrumors 604

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #24
    The 2012 13" MacBook Pro is one such example. Nearly 3-year old hardware at 2015 prices, and runs like a bag of poop due to 4GB RAM & 5400rpm drive. You're right, it is still an Apple computer. That doesn't really mean much. Neither does the year it was purchased.

    I fear what may happen on this thread is an argument about how 2GB RAM is or isn't suitable. All I can say is in my experience of doing tech support in this field for 3-4 years for a large number of Macs, RAM has been a huge issue since OS X Lion. Lion was terrible for paging and iMacs/MacBooks with anything less than 4GB RAM were crippled the moment you did any sort of task. Naturally, that's more due to Lion's shoddy RAM usage than an argument against 2GB RAM. Mavericks and Yosemite are, thankfully, much better with RAM.

    What I will also need to say is that RAM works differently on OS X than it does with Windows. On Windows, whenever you open an application, it'll page to the hard-drive (virtual memory) and to the RAM simultaneously. On OS X, because it's a UNIX system, it'll write everything to the RAM, and will continue to do so until it runs out of RAM. Once it's ran out of RAM, it'll page to the hard-drive. It won't do that before.

    That's why you get a massive benefit from 4GB-8GB RAM upgrade on OS X, but you don't see that much of a difference if you were to do the same upgrade on Windows.

    I don't mean to be rude but people suggesting to buy a Mac with 2GB RAM is really, really poor advice.
     
  25. Meister Suspended

    Meister

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    #25
    Still no video / screenshot prove of your claims.
     

Share This Page