I've been offered one locally, but I'm concerned about the ram. I'll be using it for browsing and streaming videos.
I've been offered one locally, but I'm concerned about the ram. I'll be using it for browsing and streaming videos.
I've been offered one locally, but I'm concerned about the ram. I'll be using it for browsing and streaming videos.
If you treat it like an iPad browsing in Safari then you'll be fine.
This is not necessary.Don't open too many tabs in Firefox , Safari , etc. and don't try to do too much multitasking.
No worries.I've been offered one locally, but I'm concerned about the ram. I'll be using it for browsing and streaming videos.
The OP wants to buy, not sell.The 2011 machine is MUCH faster. I was going to upgrade way back in 2011, but I wanted to keep the 920M at the time.
It's a beautiful machine, using it more again, it has me considering upgrading this Spring, but at the same time, the 2GB hurts resale value quite a bit despite it working quite well.
The OP wants to buy, not sell.
I know that the 2011 2gb still handles everything you throw at it just fine.
The people spreading nonsense like that you have to "close tabs" have no clue.
The OP wants to buy, not sell.
I know that the 2011 2gb still handles everything you throw at it just fine.
The people spreading nonsense like that you have to "close tabs" have no clue.
No, it doesn't.Well , it depends on the content of the page. If I'm not mistaken , having a bunch of pages with Flash content does slow down a computer with little RAM quite a bit.
2011 MBA, 2GB RAM, $400? Not a good deal IMO.I've been offered one locally, but I'm concerned about the ram. I'll be using it for browsing and streaming videos.
2011 MBA, 2GB RAM, $400? Not a good deal IMO.
Last Summer I bought a brand new 2014 MBA 4GB RAM for $650 @ Best Buy (before additional incentives/deals... out the door for a total of $450 taxes included)
I've been offered one locally, but I'm concerned about the ram. I'll be using it for browsing and streaming videos.
Nonsense.2GB RAM just isn't enough. Sure, the SSD will compensate for the RAM bottleneck (when it's writing to the SSD as virtual memory), but 2GB RAM just isn't enough to ensure any sort of system longevity.
Nonsense.
It's a used macbook, not a major future investment.With a comment like that, I suspect you're one of those really dangerous computer users who knows just a little bit, but bashes around on the Internet, stating hogwash like that and giving people poor advice.
Because of your arrogance, and ignorance, people run the risk of purchasing machines that will be counterproductive to their needs. OS X sings on more RAM. And 2GB RAM is a massive bottleneck in 2015 - never mind in a few years' time.
It's a used macbook, not a major future investment.
For browsing and word editing however it will still last several years and in the end RAM will not be the bottleneck.
For browsing and word editing (and even much more)
I did. No lag.But try to simultaneously run 6+ tabs in Safari with 2GB RAM, or even touch an Adobe application/DAW, you're going on a one-way trip to Lag City.
I have to agree with Meister, saying that it's not suitable because it only has 2GB of RAM is complete nonsense.
It may be that 2GB of RAM is not favorable for modern computers, but do you honestly think that when the '11 MBA came out, it was completely slow and unusable as you portray it to be?
It's still an Apple computer you know...
It was good then, and it's still usable now.
Also, you forgetting that he DOESNT have Yosemite installed. Meaning, the RAM requirements are not 2GB minimum, but whatever RAM requirements are on the OS he's running. I suspect it runs Snow Leopard, but I'm not a long-time Apple user.
Still no video / screenshot prove of your claims.The 2012 13" MacBook Pro is one such example. Nearly 3-year old hardware at 2015 prices, and runs like a bag of poop due to 4GB RAM & 5400rpm drive. You're right, it is still an Apple computer. That doesn't really mean much. Neither does the year it was purchased.
I fear what may happen on this thread is an argument about how 2GB RAM is or isn't suitable. All I can say is in my experience of doing tech support in this field for 3-4 years for a large number of Macs, RAM has been a huge issue since OS X Lion. Lion was terrible for paging and iMacs/MacBooks with anything less than 4GB RAM were crippled the moment you did any sort of task. Naturally, that's more due to Lion's shoddy RAM usage than an argument against 2GB RAM. Mavericks and Yosemite are, thankfully, much better with RAM.
What I will also need to say is that RAM works differently on OS X than it does with Windows. On Windows, whenever you open an application, it'll page to the hard-drive (virtual memory) and to the RAM simultaneously. On OS X, because it's a UNIX system, it'll write everything to the RAM, and will continue to do so until it runs out of RAM. Once it's ran out of RAM, it'll page to the hard-drive. It won't do that before.
That's why you get a massive benefit from 4GB-8GB RAM upgrade on OS X, but you don't see that much of a difference if you were to do the same upgrade on Windows.
I don't mean to be rude but people suggesting to buy a Mac with 2GB RAM is really, really poor advice.