2011 MBP Firewire vs USB Speed?

LarryJoe33

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jul 17, 2017
1,843
604
Boston
From what I understand, these models have USB 2.0 (480mbps) and FW800 (800 mbps). Is this is correct, can I expect double the transfer speed using an external FW drive vs. USB?
 

pixelatedscraps

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2017
280
185
Hong Kong
FireWire 800 is significantly faster than USB 2.0, yes. Use it over USB if you can.

You should also have a Thunderbolt / DisplayPort port as well, which I believe is a tad faster than FW800. Google will help there though.
 

LarryJoe33

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jul 17, 2017
1,843
604
Boston
FireWire 800 is significantly faster than USB 2.0, yes. Use it over USB if you can.

You should also have a Thunderbolt / DisplayPort port as well, which I believe is a tad faster than FW800. Google will help there though.
Thanks, I do have that port as well. Ultimately I would look to buy a hard drive enclose for FW or Thunderbolt to use for backup.
 

pixelatedscraps

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2017
280
185
Hong Kong
Go with a Thunderbolt equipped external hard drive or enclosure - it should have more longevity than Firewire, as it has almost entirely been replaced by TB / TB3 and USB-C.
[doublepost=1501848947][/doublepost]Go with a Thunderbolt equipped external hard drive or enclosure - it should have more longevity than Firewire, as it has almost entirely been replaced by TB / TB3 and USB-C.
 

LarryJoe33

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jul 17, 2017
1,843
604
Boston
Pretty hard to find a Thunderbolt 2 or 1 hard drive enclosure or even a SATA to TB cable. I have my old 2.5 inch spinner I would like to use for backups.
 

ZapNZs

macrumors 68020
Jan 23, 2017
2,310
1,155
FW's working speed is, in my experience, about double that of USB 2.0. However, if you are using this primarily for backups, and that backup system is Time Machine, after the initial backup then the time it takes to complete the backup is going to be relatively small with both. Consequently, the higher cost of firewire enclosures, and the relative scarcity, plus the fact that you can buy a USB 3.0 enclosure for $5 that is compatible with 2.0, may make a USB enclosure more justifiable.
 

LarryJoe33

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jul 17, 2017
1,843
604
Boston
FW's working speed is, in my experience, about double that of USB 2.0. However, if you are using this primarily for backups, and that backup system is Time Machine, after the initial backup then the time it takes to complete the backup is going to be relatively small with both. Consequently, the higher cost of firewire enclosures, and the relative scarcity, plus the fact that you can buy a USB 3.0 enclosure for $5 that is compatible with 2.0, may make a USB enclosure more justifiable.
Thanks, I already have that drive in a USB enclosure. I think I will leave it be based on the unavailability and the cost of FW and Thunderbolt.
 

killawat

macrumors 65816
Sep 11, 2014
1,451
2,281
Pretty hard to find a Thunderbolt 2 or 1 hard drive enclosure or even a SATA to TB cable. I have my old 2.5 inch spinner I would like to use for backups.
It will be hard to find TB enclosures because they entire solution had to be certified in order to be on retail shelves. With that said, I would go with Firewire over USB 2.0 for my backup drive. USB 3.0 is a different story of course. You could work on either, but if you need to boot from your external drive, you can continue to be semi productive on the FW side vs the pokey slow USB 2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LarryJoe33

LarryJoe33

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jul 17, 2017
1,843
604
Boston
It will be hard to find TB enclosures because they entire solution had to be certified in order to be on retail shelves. With that said, I would go with Firewire over USB 2.0 for my backup drive. USB 3.0 is a different story of course. You could work on either, but if you need to boot from your external drive, you can continue to be semi productive on the FW side vs the pokey slow USB 2.
I'll try and find a FW enclosure. Hopefully as cheap as USB.
 

killawat

macrumors 65816
Sep 11, 2014
1,451
2,281
I'll try and find a FW enclosure. Hopefully as cheap as USB.
What's the size of the disk you're using? Some multi terabyte solutions (3+) get flakey when stuffed into USB enclosures, in some cases.

If you don't mind buying used you can always find something from g-tech on eBay. just search for g-tech g-drive mini fw800.
 

LarryJoe33

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jul 17, 2017
1,843
604
Boston
What's the size of the disk you're using? Some multi terabyte solutions (3+) get flakey when stuffed into USB enclosures, in some cases.

If you don't mind buying used you can always find something from g-tech on eBay. just search for g-tech g-drive mini fw800.
Will do. It's my old 2.5" 250GB spinner that came with the machine (replaced with SSD). Nothing daunting.
[doublepost=1501867431][/doublepost]Good call on eBay, just got a used 750GB G Drive to $35. Better than spending $12 to put my 250GB in an enclosure.
 

Anonymous Freak

macrumors 603
Dec 12, 2002
5,223
570
Cascadia
While FireWire 800 is nominally about twice the speed of USB 2.0; an older or slower spinning hard drive probably isn't even as fast as USB 2.0. But, using a FireWire enclosure leaves your USB ports free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LarryJoe33
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.