Exactly this. When I say the 2010 was superior, I'm talking about general reliability and stability.
- As stated, I'm on my THIRD 17" MacBook Pro 2011, trying to find one that just works. It's at the point I'm tempted to sell it off and just go get a refurb 2010. If it weren't for Apple cheaping out on the box I would do that.
- 2010 did not kernel panic on me. Not once. With this third MacBook Pro, I have hit 3 kernel panics...in two days. That's NOT good.
- 2010 ran WAY cooler. By a wide margin.
- 2010 booted faster. By a WIDE margin. With a SSD in the 2010, I could cold boot in 12 seconds. Same SSD on a fresh install for a 2011 = 20-25 seconds. Makes no damn sense.
- 2010 had even backlighting on the keyboard. Every 2011 has an overbright 5 key and an underbright 6 key.
It's not just about raw speed and power. IN fact I would submit that as stated before, the laymen user won't notice a difference between a quad core i7 and a dual core i7 in real world usage. You'd get more performance from going from HDD to SSD. The 2010 series just worked.
Your personal experiences are not at all indicative of the entire line, so I'd be careful making sweeping statements. It sucks that you and a few others are having issues, but keep in mind plenty more have none.
At this point, SSD's give you nothing more than Bragging Rights!
Another silly statement in a thread already full of them from the op. An SSD is a HUGE performance increase regardless of the circumstance. Right now, I have no need for more than 128GB. If in the future the need arises for more storage, I would rather have my OS and Apps on an SSD and lug around an external USB drive for music, movies, or whatever. Perhaps that setup isn't for you, which is fine. There's no reason to insult others because of it.