Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

zalle

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jun 2, 2008
171
6
Hi guys, which do you think will process video and image files faster?

Late 2012, 27", 3.2 GHz i5 (Ivy Bridge, I guess), 16GB ram, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2048 MB

OR

Late 2013, 27", 3.2GHz i5 (Haswell, I guess), 16GB ram, NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M 1024 MB

One is newer, the other has more video memory. What do you think?

Thanks
 

maflynn

Moderator emeritus
May 3, 2009
69,097
36,978
Personally, I'd opt for the Haswell model, because its my understanding that Haswell is faster then Ivy Bridge and you also have a newer (and faster) GPU, though with a less vram.

What are you looking to do with the iMac, i.e., what tasks?
 

zalle

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jun 2, 2008
171
6
I need to process video (FCPX) and edit RAW photography (Lightroom). Intense use.

Obviously I also use it for web, e-mail, etc...
 

MadDane

macrumors 6502a
Apr 5, 2015
601
227
For Lightroom I think the faster processor will be better so for that I would say the 2013 model. However, it also depends on the speed of the storage. What internal storage is there in those two?

I have never worked with video so I do not know about that.
 

zalle

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jun 2, 2008
171
6
Both have the standard 1TB HDD, but I put all catalogues and raw files on external USB3 HDD.

I guess, all in all, both machines would be similar, right? Maybe 5-10% difference?
 

Samuelsan2001

macrumors 604
Oct 24, 2013
7,730
2,152
Both have the standard 1TB HDD, but I put all catalogues and raw files on external USB3 HDD.

I guess, all in all, both machines would be similar, right? Maybe 5-10% difference?

If you are buying second hand try and get one with a fusion drive or SSD it will make it a far more peasant experience to use.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.