Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

kansei

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 5, 2013
32
0
So, seeing as the big difference moving to Haswell is improved battery life in laptops, I figured it made sense that we'd see reduced power consumption on our desktops as well. I found this thread on the 2012 model https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1525226/. Apple quotes figures of idle screen off 20.5W / screen on 79.9W. One would expect they'd post 'optimal' figures, so it looks like the Haswells do in fact consume much less power.

Feel free to contribute readings from your meter if you have them, along with relevant system specs.

27" - i7 3.5GHz - 780M - 256GB SSD - 24GB RAM
  • idle (screen off): 16.0W
  • middle screen brightness, browsing macrumors: 48-50W
  • max during gpu benchmark (unigine heaven w/ tessellation): 139W
 

iSayuSay

macrumors 68040
Feb 6, 2011
3,729
852
What a considerable power reduction. Pretty sure 5 years from now you can get x86 CPU capability in an iPhone or iPad while conserving battery life. Kudos to Intel for reducing my power bills!
 

jg321

macrumors 6502
Aug 29, 2012
313
10
UK
So, seeing as the big difference moving to Haswell is improved battery life in laptops, I figured it made sense that we'd see reduced power consumption on our desktops as well. I found this thread on the 2012 model https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1525226/. Apple quotes figures of idle screen off 20.5W / screen on 79.9W. One would expect they'd post 'optimal' figures, so it looks like the Haswells do in fact consume much less power.

Feel free to contribute readings from your meter if you have them, along with relevant system specs.

27" - i7 3.5GHz - 780M - 256GB SSD - 24GB RAM
  • idle (screen off): 16.0W
  • middle screen brightness, browsing macrumors: 48-50W
  • max during gpu benchmark (unigine heaven w/ tessellation): 139W


Wow, that's amazing! Incredible what they're doing with these things these days.
 

bp1000

macrumors 65816
Jul 7, 2011
1,443
161
I tested power consumption of my Haswell iMac and posted the results a my thread the other day. All results at idle.

I clocked 25watts 1 bar to 70w full bar brightness.

Auto brightness put it just under half which measured 30 watts. Incredibly for a 27" iMac.
 

pastrychef

macrumors 601
Sep 15, 2006
4,719
1,417
New York City, NY
27" - i7 3.5GHz - 780M - 256GB SSD - 24GB RAM
  • idle (screen off): 16.0W
  • middle screen brightness, browsing macrumors: 48-50W
  • max during gpu benchmark (unigine heaven w/ tessellation): 139W

Wow. Those numbers are remarkable. I measured wattage of the video card using iStat Menu while running a benchmark and the video card alone was using over 175W. This is in a Mac Pro, by the way.

Thanks for posting.
 
Last edited:

ioannis2005gr

macrumors 6502
Aug 10, 2013
495
0
Europe
I tested power consumption of my Haswell iMac and posted the results a my thread the other day. All results at idle.

I clocked 25watts 1 bar to 70w full bar brightness.

Auto brightness put it just under half which measured 30 watts. Incredibly for a 27" iMac.

This is a wild progress!!!
 

fhopper

macrumors regular
Sep 18, 2007
240
112
Ks.
There are so many reasons this was a major upgrade rather than a minor one as some people have said. Power consumption is one big step forward. (Not to mention the attendant reduction in heat generation in the office. I have an LED TV and now computer in a room that used to get hot... now it does not.) Of course the networking potential in an era of intrahome streaming is another. I bet the new Apple TV will blaze with 802.11 ac
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.