Consumer Reports has 7 million subscribers, and sells a number of magazines at stores and newsstands, probably heavily based on what is on the front cover. Apple has around 7.4% of the pc market share. So that is a potential of 518,000 Mac computers that could be purchased by Consumer Reports readers. I don't think that is inconsequential.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
2016 MacBook Pro Denied Recommendation From Consumer Reports Due to Battery Life Inconsistencies
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Consumer Reports has 7 million subscribers, and sells a number of magazines at stores and newsstands, probably heavily based on what is on the front cover. Apple has around 7.4% of the pc market share. So that is a potential of 518,000 Mac computers that could be purchased by Consumer Reports readers. I don't think that is inconsequential.
I think it means he didn't like what I had to "say" (wouldn't be the first nor the last one in that department). But to carry his theory forward in a fun way, imagine Tim Cook calling a special meeting tomorrow morning after reading this person's comment and handing out the latest edition of Consumer Reports magazine. He tells everyone to forget anything they've been working on up until that moment so they can focus exclusively on what the blind followers, I mean, um..readers of Consumer Reports want from all of their products. When one guy in the back of the room snickers in defiance of this new policy, he is ordered to eat every page of that Consumer Reports magazine while everyone else watches in silent contemplation of being penalized for insubordination in a similarly demeaning manner.
The point is that Apple has yet to release specific numbers on several products, like the Apple Watch. On the other hand, when Apple does good with a product, they always release very specific numbers typical days after a release. Ask yourself why they are not consistent. The answer is easy, they only publish good numbers, but if not good then use vague terms like "Off the charts", which many think is useless, but actually translate to "sales are embarrassing so we're not going to tell you".
Same company who said the Samsung Active wasn't waterproof and they were right.
However, back to the topic, Apple should be rightly embarrassed at this, although I'm sure it will/and probably is already being tended to.
Notwithstanding what may be issues at CR I am not going to purchase a new MBP. Although anxiously awaiting the new one it seems that it is more fluff than performance, reliability, and quality.
You must avoid all the threads I've been reading. MacRumors has always had a split personality. Sure there are fans around, but I don't think there's been a day in the life of MacRumors in the past five years when people were happy about anything. Everything got panned even when Steve Jobs was around. People have very short and selective memories.
I agree, and this is why I'm going to keep using my 2012 rMBP. By the time I need to change, if Apple hasn't cleaned up their act, I'm jumping ship.
Apple is repeating all of the bad moves that almost killed in 90s. The new MacBook Pro is the Powerbook 5300 of the 21st century.
My 2016 15-inch MBP is working just fine. Just finished 110 hours of nonstop batch video encoding on Adobe Premiere. The remarkable thing was that the MBP stayed relatively cool. And I have had no problem with battery life with simple everyday tasks like surfing on Safari. Honestly, I don't trust CR's methodology. I have not had good experiences with their recommendations in the past. Just my isolated observations...
I agree with you... in the past the trouble I had was determining who is a troll versus who is genuinely frustrated, and it seems that lately there's really no need for trolls cause people like myself are getting frustrated with Apple, where previously I was always excited about new products and loved to talk them up. Now I find I'm talking them down.
They've recommended every iPhone, minus one. Every iPad. All the Macs 'cept this one and they've deemed the MBA and MBP the most reliable laptops. So does your opinion of their substandard recommendations include the aforementioned products?
Smart move by Tim: Create a subpar MacBook Pro(?) which gets low ratings thus people won't buy. Later declare the notebook (and pro) market is dead and kill the line.
That's actually a brilliant thought. Business do odd things that are unintuitive to customers. I bet Apple will just port Xcode to the iPad and call it quits with computers.
Perhaps there is a revolt against thin laptops going on. But designing "fat" computers would clearly be taking a step backwards. This reminds me of watching old movies made decades ago where the car-phone looked like it was modeled after two very large bricks that were fused at the hip. It almost looks funny to me now to see these guys holding these large devices up to their ears and using them as the prototype of what was later to evolve into our modern smartphone. In a similar way, the modern laptop is evolving until it might become so thin it will be nearly invisible. If it's being referred to as "anorexic" now, it will be more like a skeleton at that time. Of course, I can just imagine the con men lining up on the streets of New York city shouting in carnival-like fashion "Get your brand new Apple Macbook Pro's right here, folks, so thin that you can't even see it so it can't ever get in your way! Hurry 'cause I'm almost sold out (he says as he points to an empty space on the sidewalk)!" I'd counter his cleverness by handing him invisible $100 dollar bills so we'd both go away happy.
Last edited:
They've recommended every iPhone, minus one. Every iPad. All the Macs 'cept this one and they've deemed the MBA and MBP the most reliable laptops. So does your opinion of their substandard recommendations include the aforementioned products?
I disregard CR. I purchase items not made by Apple. CR has some weird recommendations. CR is not for me.
Before anyone goes crazy about the statement that I buy things not made by Apple think dishwashers, cars etc.
why? who does that satisfy?
and besides, a true professional would use this computer just fine..
it's the amateur professionals that sit around and worry about whether or not macs are true professional computers.
Anorexia finally caught up to apple.
Look its so small. And light.
Look...those few extra grams of battery that gave some buffer to longer run times isn't there anymore. And the impact of that is varying.
Look its so small. And light.
Look...those few extra grams of battery that gave some buffer to longer run times isn't there anymore. And the impact of that is varying.
I have my MacBook pro with TB 13" for 2.5 weeks now and absolutely love it. Upgraded from my MacBook Air. Smaller footprint, outstanding screen all in a smaller package. Since the latest OS upgrade I've noticed better battery life. I think its an innovative product and the TB is a cool feature. Sorry to hear that some are having issues. Really happy with mine.
Oh, man. Could you imagine the pain it would be switching between Xcode and Stack Overflow on the iPad Pro while programming? Blegh.
My thoughts exactly. I was waiting so long for this release but my mouth hit the floor during the event. Such a horrible release by Apple. And the price is a joke.
I ended up getting the new Dell XPS 15. Half the price and the battery lasts all day.
Seeing a trend of Apple users moving to Windows, this is what happens when Apple treats their customers like idiots.
Wake up Apple!
Already done. File away under "Lessons Learned":
Battery life issues...ultimately led Apple to remove the "Time Remaining" battery life estimate in the macOS Sierra 10.12.2 update.
Last edited:
Answering as objectively as you can, how are you liking your XPS 15? It's a beautiful looking machine and I am definitely interested in it.
Apple can remove the battery life remaining indicator, but it can't hide the truth.