When I see something like this compared to the often remarkable YoY improvements seen in iOS hardware, it makes me worry that the Mac is slowly dying off. For the price this thing just doesn't have the lifespan. It can't even beat the much cheaper iPad Pro on raw performance, lol. But it can do more—for now.
I see a market for it, I just don't see a $1200 market for it. This needs to start at $899 max, maybe even $799.
The bulk of the gripe comes because most users were looking for an enhancement to the existing Air lineup, not another product that cuts corners.
I would argue most people who want "thin and light" laptops are probably more than satisfied with the MBA's size and weight. In fact, as I've stated countless times, the difference in size between the 11" MBA and the 12" rMB is almost non existent. we're talking about a couple MM's here and there, and the weight of a roll of quarters difference. What we were looking forward to was an upgrade to the MBA to fix the one thing that is horrible about it. The display, which hasn't been updated in 5 years and is arguably one of the worst displays avialable on a $1000+ level laptop.
But instead of giving us the MBA's with retina option. The MBA's went untouched and a new, very compromised, and much MUCH more expensive laptop fills that spot. a Laptop that sacrifices everything the MBA had going for it, in favour of "thin".
Do you mean like the lifespan of the MacBook Air? Which started out under Steve Jobs leadership in 2008 with one port, slow cpu, poor performance, poor storage, 2 GB of RAM, poor camera, more expensive, etc. It was called a "flop."
Look how the MacBook Air has been incrementally improved over the years. Just like the original iPhone since launch. The retina MB will be no different, the Watch, too.
I guess we'll never know how well MB would sell if they added one more usb-c port and TB3 ready.
Yup. and that original MBA was a flop till the redesign which saw it add a 2nd USB port. Magsafe, Thunderbolt and a vastly upgraded CPU, with flash storage.
And I have a feeling the rMB will remain a very small niche product until it's price can be brought down to where the MBA's price point was when it took off (999 USD for the lowest spec'd model)
I guess we'll never know how well MB would sell if they added one more usb-c port and TB3 ready.
No, I'm talking about the Lifespan from a consumer standpoint. I wouldn't dare spend this much on something that is such a poor performer compared to even other Macs. It won't get the long-term support that a faster MBP will.Do you mean like the lifespan of the MacBook Air? Which started out under Steve Jobs leadership in 2008 with one port, slow cpu, poor performance, poor storage, 2 GB of slow RAM, poor camera, more expensive, etc. It was called a "flop."
Look how the MacBook Air has been incrementally improved over the years. Just like the original iPhone since launch. The retina MB will be no different, the Watch, too.
It will likely go through the Air route and the price will lower every few years. The MacBook Air was not $899 when it first unveiled.Still can't figure out why anyone would by this crap. If you're spending this much on a laptop, get a MacBook Pro. One port is unacceptable!
Still can't figure out why anyone would by this crap. If you're spending this much on a laptop, get a MacBook Pro. One port is unacceptable!
It's what happen when Apple is dependent upon Intel.
Yup. and that original MBA was a flop till the redesign which saw it add a 2nd USB port. Magsafe, Thunderbolt and a vastly upgraded CPU, with flash storage.
And I have a feeling the rMB will remain a very small niche product until it's price can be brought down to where the MBA's price point was when it took off (999 USD for the lowest spec'd model)
The January 2008 MBA was more of a proof of concept. I liked it, though. The November 2008 revision was a significant improvement, similar to the 2016 rMB vs. the 2015 rMB.
My guess is that the rMB is selling very well. Otherwise, we'd have seen a spec bump to the MacBook Air. We'll probably see a significantly revised rMPB in 2016 (perhaps as early as June).
I got last years model because I needed a better display then the Air 13 inch and have no need for more then one port (one is too many for me actually)
It is the perfect laptop for me, and if needed ports or something else I have other options such as the Pro, or the Air (which I had for 3 years). Its great to have options that meet my needs
Do you mean like the lifespan of the MacBook Air? Which started out under Steve Jobs leadership in 2008 with one port, slow cpu, poor performance, poor storage, 2 GB of slow RAM, poor camera, more expensive, etc. It was called a "flop."
Look how the MacBook Air has been incrementally improved over the years. Just like the original iPhone since launch. The retina MB will be no different, the Watch, too.
$800, I could see. $1200? Lol. No. Makes about as much sense as paying DoorDash $7 to deliver you a $1 taco. I don't know who pays for these crazy things.I see a market for it, I just don't see a $1200 market for it. This needs to start at $899 max, maybe even $799.
More like: "2016 Harley Davidson e-bicycle review roundup: More powerful, but lack of a trailer hitch still a negative."2016 Harley-Davidson model review roundup: faster, but lack of 4 wheels still a negative
So... you agree that the RMB is a mediocre product with a lot of room for improvement. (Same goes for the Watch.)
So... You agree with this member because every product Apple makes gets revisions generation after generation. According to your logic, everything is mediocre.So... you agree that the RMB is a mediocre product with a lot of room for improvement. (Same goes for the Watch.)
Still can't figure out why anyone would by this crap. If you're spending this much on a laptop, get a MacBook Pro. One port is unacceptable!