I get that. An obviously we all have different needs that create different value points. However, while it initially appeared that the 560X was a big step up from the 555X, more information is pointing to it not being a big difference UNLESS you specifically need the performance from it which I think is a fairly limited subset of users, ESPECIALLY when you consider that both dGPU options are now 4GB. And yes, no doubt a 6-Core 2.6 will outperform a 2.2 in benchmark testing, those tests show that the difference between those chips is not that significant, and in some cases is so close as to not make the 2.6 seem worth it. Quite a few sites are saying even if you want the 560X, to configure a 2.2 with it as it not only represents better value over the 2.6 but it also likely will run cooler and get better battery life. Another thing regarding the performance between the two machines is that you won’t see as much difference in single core tasks and so for much of a user’s tasks except when they push the cpu, that difference won’t be noticeable. Think about even the most demanding users and applications don’t tax the processor to its limits except for a smaller slice of use compared to the machine’s use on the whole.
But back to my first comment, each person’s needs will determine what items present the best value.
And don’t get me wrong. Love those T5 drives. But if I don’t have to use an external for core data I won’t. If I need to access data at least once a week, I want it internal. I use externals with desktops in an always connected capacity and when I use them with laptops, it is access projects and archival data outside of my typical needs and workflow.