Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Soldered 128GB is an absolute insult to their customers. How much does 128GB cost, like $20? Probably even much less at cost for Apple. There's no reason at all to not have the lowest tier start at 256GB, or even 512GB if they even pretended to care about their customers, instead of forcing people to upgrade to 256GB for an extra $200, which is even more insulting.

But they know many of us are locked into the system and won't switch to PC. This must be what an abusive relationship feels like.
Just curious, what is locking you into the system and why can't you switch to PC? Is it required for your job? Are you an iOS developer? Or is it really the average Apple fanboy's hatred of PC that has "locked" you in?
 
Amazing to think this same case used to fit 2x SATA6 2.5-inch drives.

I'm sure Apple did their diligence, but having the RAM directly above the CPU seems like it would cause heat problems with the RAM.
 
I'm surprised how little attention is being paid to the soldered CPU. The only component not upgradable (internally or externally), and Apple put the cheapest-possible Coffee Lake Core i3 into a pro-focused Mac without providing any upgrade path.
 
There is another downside of soldered storage that I haven't seen anyone mention yet. I have seen a few times in the past that when an internal drive fails, the Mac would not boot with in recovery mode nor an external boot drive.

While SSDs might be less prone failures, they still do fail and usually without warning. There is a chance that a failed soldered SSD would render the Mac Mini useless.
 
Because then you’re tied down to what ever gpu is in your iMac.... with an egpu you could have had a 1070, then upgrade to a 2070, then a 3070 etc. as more modern gpus are released.

It’s not for everyone, but I can see why you could do it over an iMac, especially if you already have an egpu/gpu/decent monitor already, then those ‘extra costs’ were already spent.

You’d probably also get better graphical performance for both gaming and professional applications than any currently offered iMac including the pro if you had something like a 1080ti or 2080, even via egpu which loses some performance due to the thunderbolt 3 to pcie lane communication/limitation

Pretty sure you can add an eGPU to an iMac Pro via TB3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macalope
It is but so is Android and Windows. Whatever you use there will be compromises. For me macOS and iOS are worth the compromises I make because I prefer these systems.
Yeah I haven't found buying a windows machine a mess. I go to HP, Dell Toshiba find the 1 I want, configure the 1 I want, how I want and done.
I truly beleive Apple loses the average consumer doing this. Wait til someone buys Apples 128GB storage system and adds a few photos and storage is gone. Most consumers aren't technical or want to buy additional egpu or storage
 
Any suggestions for:

External 2TB SSD storage

External graphics card - for high end gaming like Ultra settings on Starcraft 2

eGPU box

Is a 4K tv better than a computer monitor? Which computer monitor is good and again for high end gaming?

Or just get an Retina 5k iMac? :D

Please advise. Any help or suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
Soldered 128GB is an absolute insult to their customers. How much does 128GB cost, like $20? Probably even much less at cost for Apple. There's no reason at all to not have the lowest tier start at 256GB, or even 512GB if they even pretended to care about their customers, instead of forcing people to upgrade to 256GB for an extra $200, which is even more insulting.

But they know many of us are locked into the system and won't switch to PC. This must be what an abusive relationship feels like.
128GB is fine for servers, which is actually a very popular use of the Mac Minis. So having the lowest tier be 128GB is fine. I agree though that the upgrade pricing is a bit steep...

4. Being unable to access MY data if anything on the board fails.

This is the biggest issue I have with the soldered on storage. In the unlikely event something other than the storage fails, my data is locked down. This in the end means I just don't store my data on the internal storage and rely on TB3 for access.

The downside of that for Apple is that I am going to treat the internal storage as more of a system/swap space and adjust my SSD needs accordingly. Though I could still see myself going to 1TB instead of 512GB for convenience.
If you have to resort to accessing your data off your main drives in the event of a computer failure, on any computer Mac or PC, then you've already f**cked up a long time ago. Backup backup backup! Backups are so cheap and easy these days, how are people still worried about accessing their data in the event of a board failure? It's crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uofmtiger and Miat
Were you going to buy the i3 model? It's a fine processor for many, but it's really the only one with the 128GB which elicits such complaining.

For many use cases, the i3 128GB will probably be plenty. I am guessing Apple may see a great deal of demand for the $799 i3 with the i7 upgrade, boosted RAM, and an 10GB Ethernet port for clustering.

The i3/128GB probably isn't aimed at the consumer, that's the base i5 model.
The trouble is the price, the i3 is a fine quad-core processor but indeed comes with 128 GB of storage (and upgrading the storage is prohibitively whacked).

The i5 adds an even better hexa-core processor and 256 GB of storage, but the price makes little sense given the model's entry-level nature (the processor is fine, but coupled with "only good-enough" parts, especially no second drive or GPU options); the i5 model is 1250 euros where I live, that makes it a terrible purchase for what you get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: groadyho
Apple charges an additional $800 for 1TB. A 1TB Samsung 979 EVO NVMe SSD costs $228 at the moment. It’s disappointing and it makes Apple look bad.
Soldered storage and a huge Apple Tax on storage upgrades is very disappointing.

I was going to get a new Mini to replace my daughter's aging Mac, but maybe I might mess around with a Hackintosh option.
 
Does anyone know how many RAM slots the Mini has and how Apple fills them? For example, if I bought a 8GB model and wanted to upgrade to 16GB myself, is there space to add another 8GB or do I need to lose the original 8GB and replace with 16GB (which might make just buying a 16GB config in the first place a more cost-viable option)

Th memory will always be in pairs. If it comes with 8GB, that means 2 4GB sticks. It only has two slots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrGuder
I don’t know if Apple realizes it or not but this new updated Mac Mini wil usher in another wave of people saying goodbye to windows and jumping into Mac OS. Just like it did for me back with the 2012 Mac Mini.
 
Why not just buy an iMac with dedicated graphics? With that Mac Mini setup you’d be spending at least $800 PLUS an eGPU PLUS a monitor, and it will take up way more physical space.
I agree with the iMac remaining a better value if a good display is needed. But at this point it hasn't been refreshed to match the Mac mini, which means a wait for the 2019 models if you want equivalent CPU performance.
 



The repair experts at iFixit have completed their teardown of the new Mac mini, providing a look inside the portable desktop computer.

mac-mini-teardown-1.jpg

Disassembly of the new Mac mini remains fairly straightforward. iFixit popped off the plastic bottom cover with its opening tool and then used a Torx screwdriver to unfasten the familiar antenna plate underneath.

With access to the inside, iFixit then unscrewed the fan and popped out the logic board with some old-fashioned thumb pressing. While the RAM in the previous-gen Mac mini from 2014 was soldered to the logic board, the new Mac mini has user-upgradeable RAM, as discovered earlier this week.

mac-mini-teardown-2.jpg

As seen in older iMacs, the RAM is protected by a perforated shield that allows the memory modules to operate at a high frequency of 2666 MHz without interfering with other device functions, according to iFixit. To upgrade the RAM, the shield can be removed by unfastening four Torx screws.

Other silicon on the logic board of this particular Mac mini includes the Apple T2 security chip, a 3.6GHz quad-core Intel Core i3 processor, Intel UHD Graphics 630, 128GB of flash storage from Toshiba, an Intel JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 controller, and a Gigabit Ethernet controller from Broadcom.

mac-mini-teardown-3.jpg

Despite the good news about the RAM, the CPU and SSD are soldered to the logic board, as are many ports, so this isn't a truly modular Mac mini.

iFixit awarded the new Mac mini a repairability score of 6/10, with 10 being the easiest to repair, topping the latest MacBook Air, MacBook, MacBook Pro, iMac, and iMac Pro, and trailing only the 2013 Mac Pro.

"Back in the day, a Pro Mac meant a computer you could upgrade, configure, and connect as you pleased," iFixit's teardown concludes. "This new mini aligns so well with that ideal that we're surprised it didn't earn itself a "Pro" title--especially compared to the increasingly closed-off MacBook Pro line."

The new Mac mini earned its higher repairability score thanks to its straightforward disassembly with no tough adhesive or proprietary pentalobe screws and user-upgradeable RAM. However, it didn't earn a perfect score due to the soldered-down CPU, storage, and ports, impacting repairs and upgrades.

Article Link: 2018 Mac mini Teardown: User-Upgradeable RAM, But Soldered Down CPU and Storage
Soldered down CPU and storage. Makes repair a breeze. I swear Apple just can’t seem to keep from stepping on their own genitalia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amegicfox
It is not just a "10%-15% premium," especially when you want a TB or more in local storage. To go from the base mini's 128GB SSD to 2TB, via Apple, costs $1600, for a total of $2400 for the mini. One can buy a 2TB SSD from Amazon for $325, for a total of $1125, starting with the same base mini. That works out to a 210% increase, or in your words "premium to have Apple upgrade your SDD."
Why do you ruin your valid point by being disingenuous about it? The valid point being that if you are happy with a slower SSD (aka SATA), you cannot get that from Apple internally at an appropriate price and essentially have to pay a big premium.

Instead you create the impression that one could get an SSD with a comparable speed to internal one for $325 at Amazon, when you know that those use SATA internally and are limited to around 550 MB/s whereas the internal SSDs in Apple's latest computers are up to 5x as fast (2018 MBP: 2500 MB/s) as they connect via PCIe.
 
I'm surprised how little attention is being paid to the soldered CPU. The only component not upgradable (internally or externally), and Apple put the cheapest-possible Coffee Lake Core i3 into a pro-focused Mac without providing any upgrade path.

Probably because in 4 years cpu will use different socket so it does not really matter, and would be probably better money wise to sell the old mac mini for a new one instead of having new cpu e old everything else.
Not to talk about thermal/power issue you may run into since the machine has been tested and warrant for those cpu only.

Is not a modular computer is a mac mini Apple never said it would have been, and no there was no reason to expect it to be.
Yes Apple is expensive.
Yes you can buy a intel NUC with a 28/15W CPU, max 32GB RAM of slower ram, only one thunderbolt port and no T2 real time encodign/decoding, no 10gb ethernet, and no bluetooth 5.0 and then purchase a windows license and save some money.
 
That $325 SSD is a SATA SSD, not a NVMe drive. A comparable SSD costs about $600 ($597.99 970 EVO). But yes, Apple charges a lot for SSD.
True, and still a 150% increase over Apple--for a possibly better SSD (or it is a multi-sourced part). And, again, that doesn't consider the loss of the base drive which, granted, in the base mini is about $50--but you would keep it you upgrade.

That said I'd be okay to just boot from a Tbolt 3-connected nvme ssd, which should make its speed match or at least come close to the speed of the internal drive. But I'd have to confirm there are no issues first.



Mike
 
I'm interested in a reasonably priced eGPU as well. Not worried about the bulk, but may just add one to my 2014 Mac Mini. Thanks.
 
Any suggestions for:

External 2TB SSD storage

External graphics card - for high end gaming like Ultra settings on Starcraft 2

eGPU box

Is a 4K tv better than a computer monitor? Which computer monitor is good and again for high end gaming?

Or just get an Retina 5k iMac? :D

Please advise. Any help or suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks

if Starcraft is all the gaming you need than the iMac with the 580 is plenty, I would wait for the refresh tho...gpu performance should be similar but cpu should get a considerable boost.
 
Probably because in 4 years cpu will use different socket so it does not really matter, and would be probably better money wise to sell the old mac mini for a new one instead of having new cpu e old everything else.
Not to talk about thermal/power issue you may run into since the machine has been tested and warrant for those cpu only.
I'm thinking of someone who buys the Core i3 model (either new now or used later on) being able to upgrade to the current i5 or i7 in a few years, after the warranty has expired and the price of those processors has come down.

You'd be looking at a huge boost in multi-core performance even going from the i3 to the current i5, since Apple didn't make the i5 standard for the $799 model.
 
Mac Mini + eGPU = Killer Setup
Then it is no longer a Mac Mini, as it defeats the "mini" purpose. I wonder why they did not include a discrete GPU option. They can do it in the Macbook Pro 15", so not sure what would be the physical limitations for that.

But, I am so glad the Mini is back anyways.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.