2018 MacBook Pros Have New 'Titan Ridge' Thunderbolt 3 Controller, But DisplayPort 1.4 Isn't Truly Supported

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jul 20, 2018.

  1. MacRumors, Jul 20, 2018
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 20, 2018

    MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Earlier this week, the repair experts at iFixit opened up the 2018 MacBook Pro, uncovering Intel's new JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 controller, introduced earlier this year as part of its "Titan Ridge" family.

    [​IMG]

    While the specifications for the JHL7540 lists compatibility with DisplayPort 1.4 on Intel's product database, it's not as clear-cut as it sounds, as support also relies on graphics, which vary by MacBook Pro model.

    MacRumors reached out to Apple for clarification. Here's what we learned:

    • The new 15-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar models support DisplayPort at High-Bit Rate 3 (HBR3), a signal standard of both DisplayPort 1.3 and DisplayPort 1.4. Apple says the dedicated Radeon Pro graphics can drive up to two 5K displays at 60Hz, each over a single stream.
    • The new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar models support DisplayPort at High-Bit Rate 2 (HBR2), a signal standard of DisplayPort 1.2. This is a limitation of the Iris Plus Graphics 655 in these models, as Intel's integrated GPUs do not support DisplayPort 1.4.
    What that means:

    • The new 15-inch MacBook Pro theoretically supports DisplayPort 1.4, which Apple confirmed, but at least for now, it still can't drive an 8K display. It could be possible with VESA's lossless Display Stream Compression standard, perhaps, but it's unclear if this can be enabled down the road.
    • For now, then, the new 13-inch and 15-inch models have the same compatibility with external displays as the previous-generation MacBook Pro: up to two 5K displays or up to four 4K displays on the 15-inch model, and up to one 5K display or up to two 4K displays on the 13-inch model.
    For comparison, 2016 and 2017 MacBook Pro models are equipped with Intel's JHL6540 Thunderbolt 3 controller, which supports DisplayPort 1.2.

    In related news, Apple has also confirmed that all four Thunderbolt 3 ports on the new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar are now full speed, compared to only the two left-facing ports on the equivalent 2016 and 2017 models.

    Article Link: 2018 MacBook Pros Have New 'Titan Ridge' Thunderbolt 3 Controller, But DisplayPort 1.4 Isn't Truly Supported
     
  2. DrJohnnyN macrumors 65816

    DrJohnnyN

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
  3. OldSchoolMacGuy macrumors 601

    OldSchoolMacGuy

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    #3
    I'm so mad I can't do something none of us planned to do anyway!

    Just kidding, loving my new 2018 MBP. Thing is a beast.
     
  4. H3LL5P4WN macrumors 65816

    H3LL5P4WN

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2010
    Location:
    Pittsburgh PA
    #4
    But can it support up to 2k at 120+ frames per second? Does it support FreeSync? Those are the important details.
     
  5. PortlandP macrumors newbie

    PortlandP

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2018
    #5
    It does very little if the thermal throttling issue isn't fixed.
     
  6. kodos macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    #6
    Love mine -- it is hooked up to my new 27" LG 5K monitor. This is one of those areas where the TB3 ports are phenomenal on these machines. Glad that Apple puts this kind of effort into their high data throughput ports.

    Now as for the monitor -- not quite as awe inspiring to behold as my old 30" CinemaDisplay (stupidly sold it and my Cheese Grater in 2009) -- but the quality is certain WAY better.
     
  7. Elian_Gonzalez macrumors member

    Elian_Gonzalez

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2016
    #7
    I doubt creating your unpacking videos are going to be affected by that issue, so you're good to go, dood.
     
  8. nfilg macrumors member

    nfilg

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    #8
    Put it in a fridge and it will run an 8k @ 60hz external display.
     
  9. McTaste macrumors regular

    McTaste

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    #9
    Reminds me of how my $9,000 mac pro was supposed to support numerous 4k displays. Not sure I ever got more than one working...
     
  10. hajime macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    #10
    Given this finding, is there a disadvantage in buying the 13" model rather than the 15" model?
     
  11. avkills macrumors 6502

    avkills

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2002
    #11
    You mean putting in weak GPUs hampers driving large pixel count displays?! I wish I could tattoo an Apple exec with a nVidia logo every time one of them mentioned the importance of GPU power.

    Of course that is a moot point anyway because the current design can't even cool the top level CPU offered.
     
  12. Thanatoast macrumors 65816

    Thanatoast

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Location:
    Denver
    #12
    We’ve stepped backwards in terms of usability. Now, even though all the ports and cables look the same you may or may not have the functionality.
     
  13. dombera macrumors member

    dombera

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    #13
    I was thinking which one I should get and I've ordered 13" (i7 2.7GHz, 16GB Ram, 512GB SSD). Can't wait to receive it! It will be a very capable machine in a nice form factor :)
     
  14. macduke macrumors G3

    macduke

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Location:
    Central U.S.
    #14
    I'd love to have an 8K display but it needs to be pretty big to make it worth the resolution. I've been hoping that the new iMac would be at least 6K at 31.5" (call it 32" for marketing?) which would be the same PPI as the 5K. I would be completely satisfied with such a device for many years to come.

    Ouch. That hurts to read.
     
  15. manu chao macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    #15
    Maybe liquid-cooled pads to rest your MBP on will become popular. If GPUs can become external, cooling can too.
     
  16. Frantisekj macrumors member

    Frantisekj

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2017
    #16
    It seems that Apple upgraded not just CPU and new MPB is quite capable machine, not overpiced roster.
     
  17. guzhogi macrumors 68030

    guzhogi

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Location:
    Wherever my feet take me…
    #17
    Kinda makes me wish they'd widen the gap between the "Pro" and the "Non-Pro" MacBooks. Make the MacBook/MacBook Air the super thin, light, inexpensive option, while the MacBook Pro is thicker, but with higher end GPUs, and better thermal limits.
     
  18. icanhazapple macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    #18
    Despite having a Titan Ridge controller for Displayport 1.4, I'm not aware of a single USB-C/Thunderbolt adapter that outputs HDMI 2.0b (with support HDR), other than an overpriced aJa product - https://www.aja.com/products/io-4k

    I don't get it, Thunderbolt 3 can easily output the necessary bandwidth to support HDR - where are the adapters to support HDMI 2.0b?
     
  19. Jack Burton macrumors 6502a

    Jack Burton

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2015
    #19
    All 4 thunderbolt 3 ports being full speed makes that 13 incher quite a little beast. Glad to see they got that sorted.
     
  20. MattMJB0188 macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    #20
    The 2015 MBP still offers a whole lot more than these. Why are these being talked about? We don't want to hear about them.
     
  21. AppleZilla macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    #21
    Hmm. Going to hold onto my 2016 15-inch Touch Bar until the coming Apple Pro Monitors are released next year. I have a feeling the MacBook Pros released in that cycle will be fully baked. I have had zero issues with my 2016. It's rock solid.
     
  22. [AUT] Thomas macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2016
    Location:
    Graz [Austria]
    #22
    Nice. But I have to ask again: Displayport MST yet?
    TB3 docks are overkill unless it includes a GPU...
     
  23. theluggage, Jul 20, 2018
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2018

    theluggage macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    #23
    I think if you had any interest in DisplayPort 1.4 then you'd want the 15" with its hex core CPU and discrete AMD GPU anyway.

    Its possible that, as DisplayPort 1.4 adoption takes off, you'll start to see third-party 5k displays appear again, now that they only need a single wire. I wouldn't bank on it, though: the PC world seems happy with 4k until affordable 8k comes along.

    We've also no idea what the forthcoming Apple display is going to be - best guess would be 8k driven by Thunderbolt 3 and probably requiring DP1.4 support. Or it could have an embedded GPU. Nobody knows and, again, if that's on your wish list then you're probably wanting the power of the 15" MBP anyway.

    Interesting question is whether Apple could have chosen to use the new Intel-plus-AMD processors in the 13" MBP (https://www.engadget.com/2018/01/07/intel-amd-rx-vega-m/) - has anybody dug into the availability/performance/TDP of these to see if they'd fit?

    Afterthought: the other thing that you might miss out on without DisplayPort 1.4 is USB-C Displays/Docks that carry both 4k@60Hz video and USB 3 data - with DP 1.2, 4k@60Hz takes all four high-speed lanes in a USB-C cable and hubs/displays have to fall back to USB2. D.P. 1.4 should squish that down to 2 lanes and leve room for USB 3. However, the hardware still has to show up and, anyway, its moot if you have an Intel iGPU.
     
  24. jimothyGator macrumors regular

    jimothyGator

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #24
    Yes, that's what I want. I use an MBP for work, and truthfully, most of the time it sits on a desk. I shuttle it from home to work, and occasionally travel with it via plane, so I don't want a ten pound brick to lug around, but an extra, say half pound and quarter inch in thickness isn't going to break my back if it means:
    1. I can upgrade the RAM
    2. I can upgrade the SSD
    3. It can run at full potential without thermal issues
    So I agree with you: Let the MacBook (Air) serve people who value weight, thinness, and price, and who are willing to make compromises in performance and upgradability, and let the Pro line serve…well, professionals.

    I don't expect Apple will ever heed this advice, however.
     
  25. technoholic macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2016
    #25
    My 2016 MBP+TB is currently running out of disk space, and now it's connected to a 5k display, it's having trouble with stuttering, and basically running the fan at full speed under minimal load. Flurry screen saver is just a no no for example.

    I don't need blistering graphics performance, but I do want the experience of using a 5k display to be as close as possible to using the laptop natively. Would the latest graphics processors in the 2018 models (13") be suitable to drive the 5k display properly, with no lag or stutter?

    Thanks
     
  26. redheeler macrumors 604

    redheeler

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2014
    #25
    What makes you think Apple is going to begin making standalone displays again? I've seen no rumors to indicate that will happen.
     

Share This Page