21.5" iMac or 27" iMac

[gregpod9]

I will be be buying an iMac this week to replace my mid 2015 15" Macbook Pro as desktop replacement. I'm not a pc gamer. My usage is light to medium, and using Windows 10 Pro sometimes via bootcamp or VM. The specs I'm looking at are:
21.5" iMac 4k $2199
- i5 3.1GHz
- 16 GB Memory
- 512 GB SSD
- Intel Pro Iris Graphics 6200

27" iMac 5k $2399
- i5 3.2
- 8GB Memory (I will be adding a 16GB kit)
- 512 GB SSD
- AMD R9 M390

The 21.5" iMac is ideal for me, but the 27" iMac is tempting. Please recommend which one I should go for.

 

[Algus]

You are unlikely to need the hardware in either machine so it's really a matter of do you want a 4k 21.5'' screen or a 5k 27'' screen. If you're asking which is the better value, the 27'' IMO. 4k screens are not very expensive anymore but 5k screens are still quite costly so the 5k iMac is a great deal.

By light to medium I am assuming office work, browsing, media, etc. and not much 3D work. That being the case, you won't notice a huge difference between the Iris Pro and the R9.

 

[T'hain Esh Kelch]

I agree with the above, either machine will be fine for your needs, so pick based on what screen size you want.

 

[Samuelsan2001]

Yep your usage is pretty damn basic buy what you like.

 

[MadDane]

Why do you want to replace your MBP with an iMac? What is it with the MBP that doesn't work for you as a laptop?

I am thinking that it might be a better/cheaper solution to get a 4k display and hook it up to your MacBook along with a keyboard and mouse.

 

[blurfonz04]

The bigger the wow factor is better!

 

[Sirmausalot]

There is no question the 27" is a much better machine with superior graphics. Yes, it's huge, but something you'll likely get used to. If cost is a concern, hold off on the memory upgrade and it will still be fine. In terms of limiting factor, the graphics on the 21.5 may leave you frustrated at some point as you push your computer.

I will be be buying an iMac this week to replace my mid 2015 15" Macbook Pro as desktop replacement. I'm not a pc gamer. My usage is light to medium, and using Windows 10 Pro sometimes via bootcamp or VM. The specs I'm looking at are:
21.5" iMac 4k $2199
- i5 3.1GHz
- 16 GB Memory
- 512 GB SSD
- Intel Pro Iris Graphics 6200

27" iMac 5k $2399
- i5 3.2
- 8GB Memory (I will be adding a 16GB kit)
- 512 GB SSD
- AMD R9 M390

The 21.5" iMac is ideal for me, but the 27" iMac is tempting. Please recommend which one I should go for.

 

[gregpod9]

There is no question the 27" is a much better machine with superior graphics. Yes, it's huge, but something you'll likely get used to. If cost is a concern, hold off on the memory upgrade and it will still be fine. In terms of limiting factor, the graphics on the 21.5 may leave you frustrated at some point as you push your computer.

I'll be ordering the midrange 27 inch with the 512GB SSD upgrade.

 

[Strider64]

You won't be disappointed with a 27" iMac, for the monitor is just gorgeous. If I could I would have 36" or 42" (Though the screen would have to wider than normal). That's why I'm using a Cintiq 13" tablet as a second monitor, for you can't have too much screen space.

 

[easheer]

Get the 27". You'll appreciate the extra screen real estate.

 

[jcmendes]

In the last christmas i did the same exchange as you.

Change my MBP 15" high end (i7 2.8/16/512) For the middle Imac 3.2/R390/512..i am very happy,
I never used the portable as such...and more before i had a DELL 4K P2415Q, connect to MBP...i loved it...but..but...a Imac is a Imac...and this screen this machine for me is amazing.

Tomorrow will arrive from amazon.uk 16G hyperx 1886 . Will stay with 24G ram i hope.

my last setup



And Today...

 

[zacster]

Get the 27. As someone else said, you'll get used to the size pretty quickly. I was just saying that to my daughter while she was using my iMac, and she rolled her eyes. Not only is the screen larger, but the internals are better, with a GPU, upgradeable memory, and faster CPUs. The stock machine with a 2tb fusion drive, 3.3ghz CPU, M395 GPU, is pretty nice. I'm not convinced that a 512gb SSD is really necessary. It only saves a few fractions of a second when you first open a file that hasn't been cached to the flash part of the drive. Most of the stuff you'll use will already be there.

 

[William Wales]

I also prefer 27" iMac. If I were you, I would choose it. Because it has larger screen, faster CPU, these advantages contribute a better performance and user experience.

 

[maflynn]

I'll be ordering the midrange 27 inch with the 512GB SSD upgrade.

That's a nice configuration, and I think the 27" is a better option because it uses a dGPU, has the Skylake processor and that gorgeous 27" display

 

[gregpod9]

That's a nice configuration, and I think the 27" is a better option because it uses a dGPU, has the Skylake processor and that gorgeous 27" display

I'm not sure if I should go with the i5/M395/512GB SSD. It's only $100 more than my original configuration from the midrange model.

 

[Sirmausalot]

I'm not sure if I should go with the i5/M395/512GB SSD. It's only $100 more than my original configuration from the midrange model.

You're fine either way. Stepping up to the 27" with the dGPU and making sure you have a large SSD are the key.

 

[klatox]

I owned the 21.5" 4K iMac and I switched it out for a 27" 5K. It seemed large for a couple days but now it feels totally normal. The extra screen space is worth it.

 

[maflynn]

I'm not sure if I should go with the i5/M395/512GB SSD. It's only $100 more than my original configuration from the midrange model.

That's basically what I did (though I went for the 2TB Fusion drive).

 

[Algus]

My dad owns a 21'' Dell monitor or so. Kind of old now but back when he got it, it was one of the first affordable 1080p monitors and looked really nice. Meanwhile, I've been using the 27'' Thunderbolt display for the past few years. Funny enough, it's hard for me to imagine going back and even when I'm on my retina MacBook Pro, I just think "Ugh, the screen is so small"

There's definitely added value in having that large display IMO