21.5'' too small 27'' too big

[kblbn86]

I wish Apple re-released a 24'' iMac. Anyone with me on this?

 

[nambuccaheadsau]

No. Yesterday is dead and gone alas. It is called progress lol!

 

[Susurs]

No, I'd get 27"

 

[danielwsmithee]

Nope, wouldn't go smaller than 27" now.

 

[sboychuck]

I would actually like to see a bit larger screen as an option. Maybe an "iMac Pro" version?

It would differentiate itself as a "Pro" model and give them more room to fit bigger (better) components inside?

 

[Rmonster]

I have a 24" in my collection. I like it and could work with it everyday if I had to and wouldn't be upset. However, as a primary I would be at 27" minimum by my own choice. In an ideal world we could choose from 21, 24, 27 & 32. As an aside, I would buy a 17" macbook tomorrow if they relaunched in that size.

Cheers
Rich

 

[phpmaven]

I would actually like to see a bit larger screen as an option. Maybe an "iMac Pro" version?

It would differentiate itself as a "Pro" model and give them more room to fit bigger (better) components inside?

Yup, 32" would be pretty sweet.

 

[maflynn]

I have a 24" ACD, which is pretty nice, but there's no way I'd go to that size, 27" or larger at this point

 

[Fishrrman]

No. (and I -have- a 24" iMac).

Get the 27".
You will never regret it!

 

[Taz Mangus]

I am actually hoping Apple steps up the largest size of the next iMac to 30".

 

[johannnn]

24" is completely unnecessary, like a 14" MBP. Make a 32" option instead for the people like me that always wants the biggest and best.

 

[klky]

Three times in the past, I was worried about screen size being too big.

When I got my 17" MBP, my 70" flatscreen TV, and my 27" iMac. I didn't regret any of those decisions. The wow factor doesn't actually last that long and I got used to all of them very quickly.