I ditched Adobe for the Affinity suite: Designer, Photo and Publisher work great on my iPad and 16” MacBook Pro. Not as fully featured as Adobe, but the cash savings are significant.I would say RAM is more important than GPU cores in this case, so if you have to pick, get the RAM.
As for performance: your use cases are not really clear but having used both softwares on an M1, you should be fine - Illustrator is not yet optimised (but there's a closed beta, so it's coming).
I would also suggest you try Pixelmator Pro for photo editing: performance wise it runs circles around PS and runs beautifully on M1. I pay for the creative cloud but I simply stopped using PS since giving Pixelmator a go.
Designer can save as pdf, and Illustrator imports pdf. Doesn't that suffice?For vector design I've tried to give Designer a go, and I might try again, but as far as I know exporting to Illustrator is not possible
I'll have to test again, but sometimes that works 99% and that 1% is the bit you need for the project : )Designer can save as pdf, and Illustrator imports pdf. Doesn't that suffice?
As for performance: your use cases are not really clear
Thanks for the tip. They one-time purchase sounds amazing in the era of subscription money milking. What are the the missing features compared to the Suite that you found out when working in Affinity?I ditched Adobe for the Affinity suite: Designer, Photo and Publisher work great on my iPad and 16” MacBook Pro. Not as fully featured as Adobe, but the cash savings are significant.
For my uses (I’m a graphic and web designer), there’s nothing missing. There was up until a month of so ago, a missing selection feature (select similar) in Designer that was irritating, but they’ve since added this.Thanks for the tip. They one-time purchase sounds amazing in the era of subscription money milking. What are the the missing features compared to the Suite that you found out when working in Affinity?
I bought AF when 1st released for £19.99.I wasn’t overly impressed with the raw converter but have to say at where it is now it’s very good .The pixel editor is excellent. What are your thoughts on the Raw converter then and now?For my uses (I’m a graphic and web designer), there’s nothing missing. There was up until a month of so ago, a missing selection feature (select similar) in Designer that was irritating, but they’ve since added this.
I used Illustrator and Photoshop from their first releases, and even ran training sessions for designers, so I was pretty heavily embedded in the Adobe system. But when Affinity turned up, I jumped in straight away. The missing element for a while was a DTP app, and I needed to replace Quark (didn’t get on with the Adobe DTP app), but now Publisher has completed the set and all my work needs are covered.
They’re not perfect - I often cuss at Photo and Designer as they do things differently to Adobe that sometimes aren’t as user friendly, and new versions of Adobe software are packed with new features Affinity apps don’t have, but the huge savings in cost, and the fact they do everything for my own personal requirements, keeps me more than happy.
I think I bought Affinity Photo for the intro offer of £19.99 six years ago, (Designer 7 years ago), and they’ve provided free updates ever since. Throw in similar costs for Designer and Publisher (I’ve got Mac and Pc versions, plus their iOS releases) and compare that to what I’d have spent on Adobe and Quark Xpress, and the money saved has probably paid for my MBP.
I'd say the biggest hurdle is investing time and willingness into learning their workflow model. They are very powerful apps, but if you're used to PS for example Affinity Photo will look very confusing at first. So take the time to read up documentation and learn about how they designed the app to fit their idea of workflow.What are the the missing features compared to the Suite that you found out when working in Affinity?
Always pick the one with more RAM. As the old saying goes: "You can never be too rich, too thin, or have too much RAM". It will make your machine do more things at once and add a few years of usage when 8GB won't be enough for macOS in a few years.So I am curious what are the most important parts for my usage. I am guessing it's CPU+RAM. We cannot upgrade CPU, so I need to decide whether RAM upgrade is important in this case.
Not only that, but next to PDF you can also opt for SVG and EPS, so options enough.Designer can save as pdf, and Illustrator imports pdf. Doesn't that suffice?
My fear is that the price differential between the smaller and larger sizes may be larger than in the past. If the larger iMac has a fancier display technology, as some suggest, and a more powerful M processor, as some suggest, it may be prohibitively expensive for many of us, somewhere between the last Intel 27" iMac and the defunct iMac Pro.OP:
My opinion only, but I think you'd be better off waiting for the mx "larger screen" iMac that's due out in a couple more months.
It will be worth the wait.
And yes, for the apps you'll be using you DO need at least 16gb of RAM...
OP:
My opinion only, but I think you'd be better off waiting for the mx "larger screen" iMac that's due out in a couple more months.
It will be worth the wait.
Does the EU price include taxes? The same computer in Canada would cost about CAN$2350, but that includes about CAN$250 in taxes.I am sure it will be a great machine, but the price tag will be much greater than I am willing to pay now, unfortunately. In EU we are paying significantly more for both base item and each upgrade.
For the 24 iMac I am leaning towards:
€ 1723.02 (8C GPU, 8C CPU) + € 258.00 (+8 GB RAM)
= € 1981.02 ($ 2328.69)
It does.Does the EU price include taxes?
£1849 in the UK for a 16/512 option. I wouldn’t personally buy a spec lower than that, so still a pretty hefty price.It does.
Here in the Netherlands, the configuration I've selected (top tier, 16/512GB) comes to a whopping €2205,-. In dollars, that translates to $2644... 😭 (21% VAT included). Without 21% taxes, that would be $2185,-
The same computer would cost me $1979 if I would buy it in the US, before taxes. Still a 206 euro difference.
However, if I would buy that same iMac in, say, Florida, the the taxes are only 6%. A customer in Florida would pay a total of $2098,- (incl taxes), whereas we would pay $2644,-.
So it is not completely Apple to blame for. The 200 dollar difference however, that's on Apple.