Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It’s amazing what he accomplished in less than 15 years upon returning to the company he started in his garage.
Agreed. You look at Apple now, and it's barely even recognizable. We're all still using the same products he brought to the masses. Yes, they've been refined. But they're still the same products. That says something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: audiophilosophy
True, you have to credit Gil Amelio for directing the then sinking Apple towards the right direction. :)
I believe it was Ellen Hancock’s call, not Amelio’s. Gassée overplaying his hand on price and then not putting the hard yards in on the final presentation to the Apple Board (as opposed to Jobs and the NeXT team who were ultra-focused and had rehearsed their presentation to perfection) shouldn’t be forgotten either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
You mean that same Steve Jobs who almost destroyed the company by licensing the Mac OS to Bill Gates for Windows? That Steve Jobs?! ?

Anyone care to fact-check this claim in the article?

”Under the leadership of Jobs, Apple went from near bankruptcy to becoming the world's most valuable company.” ❌????​
Pretty sure that happened under Tim Cook not Jobs!
Sculley and his lawyers ****ed up the Windows 1.x agreement, not Jobs.
 
Not true, just a myth repeated over and over.

Quote: “The day before the announcement Apple had a market cap of $2.46 billion, and had ended its previous quarter with quarterly revenues of US$1.7 billion and cash reserves of US$1.2 billion, making the US$150 million amount of the investment largely symbolic. Apple CFO Fred Anderson stated that Apple would use the additional funds to invest in its core markets of education and creative content.“

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Apple_Inc.#Microsoft_deal

„Microsoft's $150 stock investment was the result of a settlement of a lawsuit. In fact, the investment was just an initial payment for other "substantial balancing payments" that would be spread out over then next few years, then Apple CFO Fred Anderson said at the time.“

Source: https://www.zdnet.com/article/stop-the-lies-the-day-that-microsoft-saved-apple/
It was always more about consumer confidence: “look, Microsoft has invested in us”. Well, that and keeping Office on Mac for an agreed period (although with IE as the Mac’s default browser quid pro quo).
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Mac OS has never been licensed to Bill Gates (or Microsoft). So no, can‘t be that Steve Jobs coz this never happened

OK, you got me! I was exaggerating for effect… but Jobs did license key design elements of the Mac OS. And, that did happen. It's a fact.

“Because of the close relationship between the two companies, however (Microsoft’s productivity software was a heavy driver of sales for the Macintosh), they eventually came to an agreement, wherein Apple licensed Macintosh design elements to Microsoft to be used in Windows.”​


There was even a later major lawsuit by Apple against Microsoft for intellectual property theft… but Apple lost due to its licensing agreement! Jobs gave away the keys to the kingdom…

But thanks to his — and his teams' — brilliance, they orchestrated one of the most successful company turn-arounds by introducing a string of amazing, innovative, groundbreaking products.

Yet, to reiterate what others noted, the company became the most valuable one under Cook, not Jobs!
 
I really dislike that they haven't been bothered to update some apps from the Next days. All the power of the mac, and textedit and chess are still the freaking same. I know if it aint broke dont fix it but guess what? There is enough power under the hood to have a freaking toggle switch that can turn the app from the modern version to the classic version. They have no excuse for keeping apps the same and not include new advancements UI design, they have had how many decades now to try? They have so many old apps they can turn into killer apps and they just wont even try. They can change open and save dialog boxes, window and menu designs that actually hurt productivity (compared to the speed of classic OS's, they can completely overhaul apps like imove and remove apps as in the case with the ones that came with iLife, but they can't improve on their imperfect original apps.
Yeah, that's a good point, actually. I never really think about it anymore because I've totally given up on them updating them.
 
NeXT!!!

****Hops in the time machine****

Back when I was in art school, there were a few rooms scattered across campus called "Computer Labs." Inside, there were hundreds of computers (at that time, it was rare that a student had a personal commuter) - the vast majority of which ran Windows. There was one lab that housed a handful of Macs, clones and NeXT work stations. Those NeXT boxes were SO COOL (all-black, in an all-beige era). Looking back, I'd like to thank whomever decided we needed a Mac computer lab, approved that decision, ordered, configured and maintained that lab. It's where all of the artists and designers would hang when doing "computer stuff." It forever changed the course of my life. I have since spent my entire professional career behind a Mac and am grateful to have discovered Apple. Their tools have allowed me to carve out a career, make and create, connect and express, start and raise a family. It's one of the reasons I am a shareholder. Been such a great run. Excited for what's next.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morod and citysnaps
Apple should have immediately fired Jobs again. Sure, he could do a great keynote presentation, but he was really a one-trick pony, he screwed up almost everything else.

Not firing Jobs was the worst decision Gil Amelio ever made.
 
It was always more about consumer confidence: “look, Microsoft has invested in us”. Well, that and keeping Office on Mac for an agreed period (although with IE as the Mac’s default browser quid pro quo).
What it was about was Microsloth getting caught copying QuickTime code.
 
Not true, just a myth repeated over and over.

Quote: “The day before the announcement Apple had a market cap of $2.46 billion, and had ended its previous quarter with quarterly revenues of US$1.7 billion and cash reserves of US$1.2 billion, making the US$150 million amount of the investment largely symbolic. Apple CFO Fred Anderson stated that Apple would use the additional funds to invest in its core markets of education and creative content.“

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Apple_Inc.#Microsoft_deal

„Microsoft's $150 stock investment was the result of a settlement of a lawsuit. In fact, the investment was just an initial payment for other "substantial balancing payments" that would be spread out over then next few years, then Apple CFO Fred Anderson said at the time.“

Source: https://www.zdnet.com/article/stop-the-lies-the-day-that-microsoft-saved-apple/
Curious why it was painted as a completely different light in public by Jobs?

Jobs has been filmed stating that Apple was days from Bankruptcy - having 'cash or cash reserves' is just liquidity, it doesn't state anything about a balance sheet of liabilities, debts, investments/investment payments due. There is also dividends as well (not sure if Apple actually stopped those, if so that is a TRUE sign of poor health of a company whom has 'case reserves').
 
Curious why it was painted as a completely different light in public by Jobs?

Jobs has been filmed stating that Apple was days from Bankruptcy - having 'cash or cash reserves' is just liquidity, it doesn't state anything about a balance sheet of liabilities, debts, investments/investment payments due. There is also dividends as well (not sure if Apple actually stopped those, if so that is a TRUE sign of poor health of a company whom has 'case reserves').
Well, I dunno. I take it as given that the CFO who signed off the deal (Fred Anderson) knew what he was talking about when he said that. Actually it seems like Apple never had to touch said 1.2 bn, corroborating Andersons statement.

Anyway, if the situation were indeed as dire as the picture you painted suggests, 150 mn would hardly have saved them, would it?

What really saved them in the end was the iMac and ultimately the iPod, not Microsoft
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Saturn007 and Morod
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.