I have a non-early 08 Mac Pro, and it has a 7300, since I didn't spring for the 1900 video card. I want some improvement in performance immediately, but don't want to shell out $400 for the 1900 when I'll probably upgrade to the 8800 if and when it becomes backwards compatible. Mainly this is for Aperture usage.
So, I saw the barefeats results of the 2600 on the non-early 08 Mac Pro and thought, given the cheap price, it would be an interim card. Now I have a couple of questions.
(1) Can I use the 2600 in the fast slot and the 7300 in the lower slots.
(2) Would that make sense to drive 2 Dell 2407s separately (is that possible, one for the 2600 and the other for the 7300), since wouldn't I not be splitting the vram then? Or does it make sense to just drive both with the 2600? Would there be no difference in performance?
(3) Has anyone moved from a 7300 to a 2600 and found the difference just so negligible that it's not worth it (or run into problems).
Thanks,
Brian
So, I saw the barefeats results of the 2600 on the non-early 08 Mac Pro and thought, given the cheap price, it would be an interim card. Now I have a couple of questions.
(1) Can I use the 2600 in the fast slot and the 7300 in the lower slots.
(2) Would that make sense to drive 2 Dell 2407s separately (is that possible, one for the 2600 and the other for the 7300), since wouldn't I not be splitting the vram then? Or does it make sense to just drive both with the 2600? Would there be no difference in performance?
(3) Has anyone moved from a 7300 to a 2600 and found the difference just so negligible that it's not worth it (or run into problems).
Thanks,
Brian