This is my virgin post. I've been schooling up on storage options since the refurb'ed late 2013 iMacs became available, and I think I'd prefer a pure SSD vs. a fusion drive. I've used a number of tools to check back in time, and it appears that SSD equipped have refurbs popped up much less often. Am I right? (the machines showing up for $1869 are just about right for me). My work 2013 rMPB has spoiled me. Please let me know if the instant performance of applications I've come to love would be different with fusion. I've been looking on AnandTech, Apple's forum, and here for something that clearly spells out the difference between 2013 fusion and 2013 SSDs from a power user, but non-videographer, standpoint. If I wait a while will I probably see a 256 show up in one of those below-$2k models real soon? Has anyone had equivalent application performance from 2013 fusion (except for retrieving media from months ago, etc. of course)? If no on both, I'll just return all the Christmas gifts I bought people and pay the extra $350 to get an equiv. brand new model with SSD. Thanks.