Here's how you could look using the iPhone 7 Plus:
[doublepost=1471971143][/doublepost]
Yeah, it's discussed on the front page of MR as well, where it's specified that it's predominantly due to limited available supply. Of course Samsung needs to secure inventory for all of their needs first--why wouldn't they? Assuming they move the curved edges to all of the top models, plus add the full roster of iPhones (purely guessing but I'd wage that more than doubles the need), your looking at an awful lot of demand that Samsung likely cannot meet, at least initially.
And let's flip the scrip for a second. If I were Samsung, would I want to make what's become a trademark of my flagship smartphones fully available to my biggest competitor? There's a reason why only Samsung phones have these remarkable OLED displays right now. 😉
And to be clear, I'm not giving Apple a pass here. When Samsung says they could've easily supplied Apple with displays for all of their phones yet Apple only includes it on a smaller volume, premium model, I'll levy my criticism quite harshly at Apple.
Yup, if it's a supply issue, then there's not much Apple can do. Like I said, I understand their reasoning behind what they're doing. What choice do they have. And if they can continue filling that bank of theirs, why not? People have proven they're willing to pay for their products, even the high-end and expensive ones.
Just sort of sucks for the iOS consumer or generally any consumer who wants the latest and most advanced tech and features in their iPhone, but can't get it in a smaller form factor or in a more affordable option. And all the while, you could have Samsung actually expanding their edge technology to more of their lineup.
But hey, who knows what Apple might come up with that'll give them the edge, so to speak. I can't wait to see what they'll do with it. It would have to really stand out to differentiate from what Samsung has already done, and to help sell the high end premium model.
EDIT:
Also...
It makes me wonder about this year, too. Did they opt to not try the three-model format this year as they were rumored to have intended to due to supply constraints of the dual camera, or due to that dip in sales, or even due to the competition (not just Samsung, but competition from the low/mid range might make it harder to convince people for an even more premium model)? Wonder what happened there.
I don't know how anyone can see this and not reconsider whether we should really be celebrating Apple's superior profits when they think they can get away with limiting technology to the highest and most profitable models. They've gotten away with it before, so I guess why not? But is this what we all really want? More profits for Apple, less options for consumers?