3.1 safari scores 100 on Acid3 test

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by macfanboy, Jul 14, 2009.

  1. macfanboy macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    #1
    not bad :)
     

    Attached Files:

  2. -aggie- macrumors P6

    -aggie-

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    Where bunnies are welcome.
    #2
    Ahhh, something that makes it all worthwhile. I'll sleep better tonight, for sure.
    ;)
     
  3. Pared macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
  4. fabianvs macrumors regular

    fabianvs

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Location:
    FL
    #4
    this is offtopic but do you see any battery improvements over 3.0 ? :eek:
     
  5. David G. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Location:
    Alaska
    #5
    Yep, 97 and it's not smooth like it supposed to be with mine. But of course I'm an idiot who didn't see the 3.1 when I originally posted this message.
     
  6. moka macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Location:
    California
    #6
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16)

    I got a 97 too with very little animation jerk.
     
  7. macfanboy thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    #7
    remember, this is 3.1, not 3.0

    OH yes, definitely. on iphone 2G, i went from 5 hours of normal usage to 8 - 9 hours.
     
  8. Haephestos macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
  9. milerich macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    #9
    Got a 97 on my 3G S running 3.0.

    Odd though, got a 72 using Firefox and 100 using Safari on my MBPro...
     

    Attached Files:

  10. macfanboy thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    #10
    have you tried ie 8 yet? (you don't wanna know the results lol, ive tried it)
     
  11. milerich macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    #11

    No, my company won't allow me to install any upgrades on my work laptop. I love coming home to my MBPro!

    Also, can't wait for 3.1 to be released!
     
  12. nfl46 macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
  13. slpdLoad macrumors 6502a

    slpdLoad

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    #13
    Nothing odd about it.

    97 as well on 3.0 3GS.
     
  14. isaaclimdc macrumors 6502

    isaaclimdc

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    #14
    Yup, same.
     
  15. braddick macrumors 68040

    braddick

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Location:
    Encinitas, CA
    #15
    Me too.
    Don't know exactly what this all means, but I know back in school a 97 was a pretty good score. :)
     
  16. Megalobyte macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Location:
    Florida
    #16
    What does this test?

    I also got 97 with 3.0 on a 3gs.
     
  17. braddick macrumors 68040

    braddick

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Location:
    Encinitas, CA
    #17
    It test your iPhones pure awesomeness!!

    (Heck, I don't know... I'm just happy with my score. . .)

    ;)
     
  18. thor79 macrumors 6502

    thor79

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #18
    It is a web standards test. Basically does the browser follow the rules of major web standards. The Acid tests have been the baseline all major browser makers go by pretty much.
    Webkit (what Safari and Chrome are based on) has been Acid3 complaint for a while. (they get 100)
    Firefox is good but does worse than Mobile Safari on 3.0...managing only a 93 on my Firefox 3.5.
    IE8 got a 20 on my system while IE7 (IE8 in compatibility mode) only got 13. IE has never been known for their standards compliance.
    Opera gets a decent 85 (not sure if my Opera is the most up to date though).
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3
     
  19. cupofjoe macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #19
    I dont know why everyone is putting 'their' score up on this post? You're all running the same browser on your phone. All iPhones running 3.0 will score 97, all running 3.1 will score 100. Same goes for desktop results, they are identical results depending on the version.
     
  20. milerich macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    #20

    It was odd for me just because I thought Firefox was as good as Safari in all respects.

    But you learn something everyday, and in this case I learned Safari was cooler :D
     
  21. sneeks macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2007
    Location:
    Glasgow, UK
  22. milerich macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    #22
    Holy heck! Here are the results from IE on my work PC.
     

    Attached Files:

  23. Pared macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    #23
    I just tested this again and got a 97 again.

    Perhaps everyone should all post their scores. I don't believe you.
     
  24. WilliamG macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Location:
    Seattle
    #24
    I got 97/100 on 3.0 on my 3GS, and 100/100 on my 2.66Ghz unibody 17" MacBook Pro at 1080p connected to my 24" Cinema Display.
     
  25. tico24 macrumors 6502

    tico24

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Location:
    Eastleigh, UK
    #25
    Of course you got 97 on your 3.0 3Gs....it'll be the same regardless of which phone/laptop you use, it depends on what BROWSER you use.

    So your 100/100 score was probably because you were using Safari on your laptop (rather than firefox).
     

Share This Page