Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

aaquib

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Sep 11, 2007
1,496
1
Toronto, Canada
Now, I am in the market to replace my stock 160GB HDD in my MB, as I want a bigger hard drive in my PS3 and was thinking I could put the MB one in there, and buy a larger one for the MB.

I am debating between a 320GB 7200rpm and a 500gbrpm drive. I currently have this external drive:

http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-ST302504FDA1E1-RK-FreeAgent-Desktop-External/dp/B000NDBRJC

I HATE it. It takes a super long time to start up(close to 3-4 minutes) and then opening up videos takes a good 2-3 seconds. But, I have a 5400rpm drive inside the MacBook and was wondering if 7200rpm with 16mb cache would really make a significant difference in day-to-day use.

What would you go for?
 

mcavjame

macrumors 65816
Mar 10, 2008
1,031
1
phased to this universe
When I got my Macbook a year and a half ago, the first thing I replaced was the HDD. Drive speed is one of the bottlenecks in your machine and I certainly notice the laptop runs faster with the 7200 rpm drive and 4GB of RAM.

My wife opted to stay with a 5400 rpm drive. Even though her machine is a newer model than mine, apps open quicker and there is less stutter with my machine.
 

errol

macrumors 6502
Jan 11, 2008
307
78
500gb 7200RPM 2.5" drives are right around the corner if you can wait. I agree though, get 7200RPM.
 

mcavjame

macrumors 65816
Mar 10, 2008
1,031
1
phased to this universe
500gb 7200RPM 2.5" drives are right around the corner if you can wait. I agree though, get 7200RPM.

Yeah, but the 320 7200 rpm is relatively cheap and s/he would get the performance now. Here is a listing from one of my favorite canadian vendors, directcanada.com
 

Attachments

  • 7200rpm.png
    7200rpm.png
    21.4 KB · Views: 1,332

aaquib

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Sep 11, 2007
1,496
1
Toronto, Canada

mcavjame

macrumors 65816
Mar 10, 2008
1,031
1
phased to this universe
Anyone think I should go for it? They have a store just a couple of minutes away from where I live, so it'd be the most convenient for me.

The Travelstar is the drive I have and it has worked great. The only hitch is how you will transfer data. I have SATA docking station for replicating HDDs with carbon copy cloner (or any similar utility). Otherwise you have to back up your data to restore after the new drive is installed.
 

maverick808

macrumors 65816
Jun 30, 2004
1,142
150
Scotland
If it matters to you then you should note that a 5400RPM drive will likely be considerably quieter than a 7200RPM.

I had a 320GB, 7200RPM drive in my MacBook but I replaced it with a 320GB, 5400RPM because it is sooooo much quieter. Yes it is ever so slightly slower, but the difference in speed is negligible whereas the difference in sound is substantial.
 

pinback pro

macrumors member
Oct 16, 2008
87
0
since you have an external, i would got with a 7200 rpm drive. i just installed mine last night, WD 320gb 7k rpm, it is WICKED fast. you'll be blown away. negligible temp difference. like 2-4 degrees F. its awesome to see the boot time nearly cut in half. and loading several apps at once is so cool. photoshop cs3 loads in prolly 1/3 the time it used to with the 120gb 5400 rpm drive.
 

paduck

macrumors 6502
Jul 5, 2007
426
0
You seem to answer the question yourself when you stated how important speed was for you - go with the 7200rpm if performance is the most important variable.

However, the downside to the increased performance is smaller size, more heat, more energy used, and louder.

Other people will have different answer, based on their requirements.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.