320M vs 9600M GT

[Kingcodez]

Does anyone know how they compare? I'm just curious, they both have 256MB of ram, the 9600M has GDDR3 while the 320M has just DDR3...

I mean there's probably still a gap but it's definitely getting smaller now.

 

[murdercitydevil]

EDIT: my bad, I thought you were talking about the 330M.

 

[waloshin]

Sorry 9600m Gt is discrete so it is better performance wise.

 

[Kingcodez]

Yeah I didn't see the other threads, just popped up.

I know the 9600M is more powerful, I just want to know by how much.

 

[SchneiderMan]

How about the 330M Vs. 9600MGT?

 

[therealseebs]

How about the 330M Vs. 9600MGT?

Appears to be a little faster -- not much. Basically, it has more cores, so it seems to come out around 50% faster. It's otherwise basically the same hardware, and likewise, basically the same as the 8600M GT, only faster. The 9600M GT was just a better-clocked 8600M on smaller process, the 330M is roughly the same hardware with 50% more shaders. That's it.

 

[saschke]

Thread: Comparison between 320M and 9600M GT - please weigh in. This is interesting for some folks.

 

[alphaod]

320M is crap compared to 9600M; 330M is a die-shrink of the 9700M, so it's a bit better.

 

[Chew]

We could use a detailed 3DMark06-Scoring of a 9600GT. A detailed scoring of the 320M is around in another thread. We need all three numbers, not only the final score (because we must leave out CPU score)

 

[saschke]

320M is crap compared to 9600M;

Thanks for contributing in such a meaningful way. 🙄

 

[MrXiro]

I thought the 9600m GT has 512mb or RAM...

I was wondering about the comparison myself.

 

[mark28]

320M is crap compared to 9600M; 330M is a die-shrink of the 9700M, so it's a bit better.

The difference between the 330m and 9600m is larger than the difference between the 9600m and the 320m. 🙄

The 330m is alot better than the 9600m btw. The 330m performs around 50% faster than the 9600m GT.

3DMARK05 scores

330m: 12664
GT9600m: 9592
320m (integrated): 7168


Crysis ( high ):

330m: 20 fps
9600m: 13 fps
320m (integrated): 11 fps

Crysis ( low ):

330m: 78 fos
9600m: 59 fps
320m (integrated): 40 fps

WoW (high)
330m: 42 fps
9600m: 20 fps
320m (integrated): 23 fps

 

[MrXiro]

The difference between the 330m and 9600m is larger than the difference between the 9600m and the 320m. 🙄

The 330m is alot better than the 9600m btw. The 330m performs around 50% faster than the 9600m GT.

3DMARK05 scores

330m: 12664
GT9600m: 9592
320m (integrated): 7168


Crysis ( high ):

330m: 20 fps
9600m: 13 fps
320m (integrated): 11 fps

Crysis ( low ):

330m: 78 fos
9600m: 59 fps
320m (integrated): 40 fps

WoW (high)
330m: 42 fps
9600m: 20 fps
320m (integrated): 23 fps

Wow... I feel kind of jipped that I bought the 15 inch 2.53ghz 2008 uMBP even though it was as a Refurb. Feels like I would have gotten a better machine out of the 13 inch MBP... and more compact too... and I would have gotten an SD card reader.

 

[alphaod]

Thanks for contributing in such a meaningful way. 🙄

Like your contribution was meaningful? 🙄

Thread: Comparison between 320M and 9600M GT - please weigh in. This is interesting for some folks.