Thank you for posting the first real comparison I've seen. I think it really puts things into perspective.
You mean 171mm right?
How much is the omega worth?
The Apple Watch looks shockingly better. I'm beginning to really appreciate the design.
I bought it brand new three years ago for $3,700
It is incredible to me how the stainless steel link band model looks and likely feels superior to a $3,700 watch.
I'm 6'2" tall, 185lbs with 171mm wrist
38mm is what I've chosen, just more subtle than the 42mm.
I'm 6'2" tall, 185lbs with 171mm wrist
38mm is what I've chosen, just more subtle than the 42mm.
Which band did you go with?
Thanks for this - I was getting nervous about ordering the 38mm instead of the 42mm, since I have a 175mm wrist (big, for a woman!) But I really like the size of it on you, so I'm sure I'll like it on me too.
I'm 6'2" tall, 185lbs with 171mm wrist
38mm is what I've chosen, just more subtle than the 42mm.
thats a small seamaster. What size is it?
Very interesting post, and very informative pictures. Thanks for posting them.
No quarrel at all with the 38mm on a man - some of the modern wrist watches are too bloated for words, and wrists differ in size.
However, I am not sure that you are quite comparing like with like, when you post your current Seamaster alongside two Apple Watches.
Personally, I am a fan of the old 1950s and 1960s Seamasters; as the Apple Watch does seem to have nice, clean lines, the watch I would like to see it compared with (on a wrist, as you have done so thoughtfully) would be an example of the 1950s and 60s Seamasters, which also had nice, elegant, clean and uncluttered lines, and straightforward bezels and straps).
Perfect. Thanks OP. I have a Omega Planet Ocean. Now I know how big the 42mm is that I ordered.
However the 42mm is screaming "here I am" whereas the other one is more discrete, while providing the same functionality.