Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Starflyer

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jan 22, 2003
710
1,146
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A102 Safari/419.3)

Sorry if this has been discussed before, but is it resonable to assume the battery life of the 3G iPhone will be the same as being connected to WiFi with the current version?
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A102 Safari/419.3)

Mykbibby said:
It would take a greater hit on the battery than WiFi, or else they would have included it, no?

good point.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A102 Safari/419.3)

siurpeeman said:
and just for the record, using wifi takes less battery than using edge on the current iphone.

Interesting.
 
It would take a greater hit on the battery than WiFi, or else they would have included it, no?

They specifically said they weren't including 3G last year because the technology was still improving and there would be better 3G chips in 2008 than there were in 2007.

So we can't make any guesses on this year's phone based on last year's choices. They're totally un-related.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.