I've just read a review of the new Samsung Omnia HD on the register where they gave it an 85% rating based partly on the fact it does HD recording and has an 8MP camera.
However, if you look at the sample photos in the review, they are absolutely atrocious quality, and the video is poorly exposed and very jerky. I thought I'd do a quick comparison so took my 3GS into the garden and took a quick shot. I've attached a 100% crop from one of the sample pictures on the register (the pillar box), and from my 3GS (the wall) and IMO the picture from the 3GS looks better.
Neither phone will be able to replace a "real" camera (I've added one taken with my FZ28, which is a decent 10MP P&S for comparison: It's also of the wall, but has FZ28 in the bottom corner!), but I think it emphasises the fact that people should not get too hung up on megapixel counts - it's not always true that more is better!
However, if you look at the sample photos in the review, they are absolutely atrocious quality, and the video is poorly exposed and very jerky. I thought I'd do a quick comparison so took my 3GS into the garden and took a quick shot. I've attached a 100% crop from one of the sample pictures on the register (the pillar box), and from my 3GS (the wall) and IMO the picture from the 3GS looks better.
Neither phone will be able to replace a "real" camera (I've added one taken with my FZ28, which is a decent 10MP P&S for comparison: It's also of the wall, but has FZ28 in the bottom corner!), but I think it emphasises the fact that people should not get too hung up on megapixel counts - it's not always true that more is better!