Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't see how this can be anything other than pilot error, in which case he or she is in a big pile of poop.

edit: so, clearly I was very wrong in my assumption. bravo Mr Pilot fellow!
 
Right when I am going to fly to LHR in 2 weeks.. and I'm so fearful of flying anyway :(

Flying is still one of the safest forms of travel, and things like this are a one-in-a-million, freak occurrence.


Anytime someone says they're scared of flying, I just tell them they are much more likely to die in a car accident on the way to the airport. Whether or not that helps, I dunno, but it's true
 
Flying is still one of the safest forms of travel, and things like this are a one-in-a-million, freak occurrence.


Anytime someone says they're scared of flying, I just tell them they are much more likely to die in a car accident on the way to the airport. Whether or not that helps, I dunno, but it's true

Statistically.. it's the safest.. but personally, I would rather die in a car crash than a plane. It's just.. I'm not in control in a plane.. don't know what's going around. The worst bit is.. if something goes wrong, you have 35,000 feet left to know that you're going to die.

Car crash is usually.. *BAM* .. and you're hurt.. or dead.

Edit - I wish they still had ocean liners in service, lol
 
Coincidence?

Picture 1.png
 
I don't see how this can be anything other than pilot error, in which case he or she is in a big pile of poop.

Well BBC News 24 is reporting the aircraft lost all power… apparently the pilot managed to "glide" the plane as far as it could go… so maybe not pilot error after all?
 
But what would cause a catastrophic loss of power like that?

Two engines at the same moment? Electrical fault, fuel shortage?

Looks like Boeing (or in this case Rolls-Royce) is going to have to do some serious investigating…

A flock of Canada Geese could also have something to do with it apparently.
 
The worst bit is.. if something goes wrong, you have 35,000 feet left to know that you're going to die.

Edit - I wish they still had ocean liners in service, lol

And then in that instance, you have thousands of feet of deep blue to let you slowly know you're either going to drown or be crushed lol
 
Right when I am going to fly to LHR in 2 weeks.. and I'm so fearful of flying anyway :(

When a plane crashes, it's international news. You should check air traffic sometime- there's hundreds of planes in the air at any given time. Hundreds of flights per day. There's maybe one or two accidents per year, and people don't always die (see this one).

I wouldn't be surprised if more people die in car accidents in one day than die in plane crashes in one year. There's really nothing to fear. :)

The worst bit is.. if something goes wrong, you have 35,000 feet left to know that you're going to die.

I'd personally rather have a brief moment to think instead of having everything cut off suddenly.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if more people die in car accidents in one day than die in plane crashes in one year. There's really nothing to fear.

They do. I think the last time I heard an ace fact about air travel was that in the world on average each year more people are killed putting their trousers on at the top of the stairs and falling down than in plane accidents.
 
They do. I think the last time I heard an ace fact about air travel was that in the world on average each year more people are killed putting their trousers on at the top of the stairs and falling down than in plane accidents.

I do that :eek:, thanks for the warning, will put them on before I leave my room.
 
I don't see how this can be anything other than pilot error, in which case he or she is in a big pile of poop.

A little early to be saying that. According to the BBC the crew lost both engines and had to glide in. If they were a little low on approach (I guess technically an error, but normally easily correctable when the engines are working) the crew would have had no choice but to glide as far as they could.
 
The worst bit is.. if something goes wrong, you have 35,000 feet left to know that you're going to die.
I don't believe there are any documented cases of airliners suffering a fatal malfunction at cruise altitude. It's common for planes to drop a couple hundred or more feet while hitting turbulence, but none has ever crashed as a result.

Most airplane accidents will occur either just before landing (like this one) or just after takeoff. Not at high altitudes. So you wouldn't have that long to suffer, assuming you were even conscious.
 
article said:
"It's a miracle. The man deserves a medal as big as a frying pan."

I say, a medal as big as a GE90.

I don't believe there are any documented cases of airliners suffering a fatal malfunction at cruise altitude.

The most infamous examples are those of the de Havilland Comet back in the 1950s, due to a fundamental design flaw.

The Comet was the first jet airliner, and first flew in 1949.
 

Attachments

  • p8comvp1.jpg
    p8comvp1.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 79
A little early to be saying that. According to the BBC the crew lost both engines and had to glide in. If they were a little low on approach (I guess technically an error, but normally easily correctable when the engines are working) the crew would have had no choice but to glide as far as they could.

From the sounds of it, the pilot saved the lives of everyone on board - the low approach could've been ordered from the tower because traffic.
 
Just had BBC News 24 on over tea, and ruddy nora every other news story was an update! I'd have liked to have heard more on our little Russian problem.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.