Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

42 / 38 ppi ?

M

Mapple86

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Hi,

Well i found manny different statements aboutth ppi of both models.
First i found that the 38 is 290ppi and 42 is 302ppi.
Now sone people are telling they have both exactly 326ppi.
Anybody here can tell me what is the truth about the ppi?
 
They are both (slightly above) 326 PPI when the exact screen size is taken into consideration (for the 42, I calculated 333 and for the 38, 332).

290 and 302 PPI is calculated when the sizes of the watch are used for vertical height (38 or 42 mm). Since the screen is not the entire size of the watchface, both Apple watches have a PPI of >326.
 
Last edited:
p3ntyne said:
They are both 326 PPI when the exact screen size is taken into consideration (It actually something like 325.7 PPI but that doesn't really matter).

290 and 302 PPI is calculated when the sizes of the watch are used for vertical height (38 or 42 mm). Since the screen is not the entire size of the watchface, both Apple watches have a PPI of 326.
Click to expand...

Sorce?
 
Crazy Matt said:
Sorce?
Click to expand...

My own calculations (which have been added in with an edit).

The 42 mm watch has a resolution of 390x312 and a screen that is 38 mm diagonally. The 38 mm is 340x272 with a 33.3 mm screen. It's pretty easy to calculate.

Also someone on reddit used a professional tool to measure theirs and got a figure close to 326 too.

EDIT: now that I think about it, that's also slightly inaccurate since the PPI of both is 333 and 332.
 
Last edited:
Mapple86 said:
Hi,

Well i found manny different statements aboutth ppi of both models.
First i found that the 38 is 290ppi and 42 is 302ppi.
Now sone people are telling they have both exactly 326ppi.
Anybody here can tell me what is the truth about the ppi?
Click to expand...

juniorspank said:
No, they're definitely both 326. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Watch

https://m.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/360j0r/note_the_apple_watch_has_a_pixel_density_of_326/
Click to expand...

Actually, no they both are not. But they are both pretty darn close and when it comes to any smartwatch on the market, I believe the Apple Watch trumps them all in the ppi department (at least until the new Android Wear watches get released from Motorola, Huawei, Samsung, etc.

Anyway, based off the official Apple Watch SDK, we know the following:

The 42mm Apple Watch has a 312px by 390px resolution and a diagonal screen measuring 39mm or 1.535in. This = 325.37ppi

The 38mm Apple Watch has a 272px by 340px resolution and a diagonal screen measuring 36.048mm or 1.419in. This = 306.8ppi.

See below for SDK info on dimensions/resolution figures.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    489.5 KB · Views: 146
Lloydbm41 said:
The 42mm Apple Watch has a 312px by 390px resolution and a diagonal screen measuring 39mm or 1.535in. This = 325.37ppi

The 38mm Apple Watch has a 272px by 340px reolution and a diagonal screen measuring 36.048mm or 1.419in. This = 306.8ppi.
Click to expand...

It seems that all sources show a different size for the display. In my calculations, I used 33.3 and 38 mm for the display sizes.
 
p3ntyne said:
It seems that all sources show a different size for the display. In my calculations, I used 33.3 and 38 mm for the display sizes.
Click to expand...

For the 38mm watch, the height and width is 38.6mmx33.3mm, so the diagonal is 36.048mm or 1.419inches.

The 42mm watch has a height and width of 42mmx35.9mm, so the diagonal is 39mm or 1.535inches.

I think I'll trust that Apple has it right in their own SDK.
 
Lloydbm41 said:
For the 38mm watch, the height and width is 38.6mmx33.3mm, so the diagonal is 36.048mm or 1.419inches.

The 42mm watch has a height and width of 42mmx35.9mm, so the diagonal is 39mm or 1.535inches.

I think I'll trust that Apple has it right in their own SDK.
Click to expand...

The height of the entire watch is not the height of the display, using 42mm and 38mm is incorrect and it's clearly proven on the reddit thread.

Apple posted the schematics online and are shown here via Gruber's twitter: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CFF8yNWWYAAUu37.png:large

The image shows the active display area as 21.22mm x 26.52mm, which gives a diagonal of 33.96mm.

33.96mm = 1.3370079 inches and plugging that number into a PPI calculator with the 272px by 340px, also officially from Apple, gives us 325.66ppi, effectively 326.

So using all official information from Apple, the 38mm has a ~326ppi screen.
 
juniorspank said:
The height of the entire watch is not the height of the display, using 42mm and 38mm is incorrect and it's clearly proven on the reddit thread.

Apple posted the schematics online and are shown here via Gruber's twitter: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CFF8yNWWYAAUu37.png:large

The image shows the active display area as 21.22mm x 26.52mm, which gives a diagonal of 33.96mm.

33.96mm = 1.3370079 inches and plugging that number into a PPI calculator with the 272px by 340px, also officially from Apple, gives us 325.66ppi, effectively 326.

So using all official information from Apple, the 38mm has a ~326ppi screen.
Click to expand...

I stand corrected. I made a math error in my Pathagorean Theorum. Surprised I didn't get called out on that! Stupid me divided by 2 then square rooted the hypotenuse, instead of just square rooting the hypotenuse. Duh.

I redid my calculations and you are perfect (if the active display area is what you posted).

So, what is the active display area of the 42mm?
 
Lloydbm41 said:
I stand corrected. I made a math error in my Pathagorean Theorum. Surprised I didn't get called out on that! Stupid me divided by 2 then square rooted the hypotenuse, instead of just square rooting the hypotenuse. Duh.

I redid my calculations and you are perfect (if the active display area is what you posted).

So, what is the active display area of the 42mm?
Click to expand...

Nobody likes math on the weekend!

The 42mm has an active display area of 24.34mm x 30.42mm as shown here: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CFF-k5dWEAEx7xw.png:large
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back