So on my iPhone 5, at times it says 4G in the status bar, and other times it says LTE. What's the difference? Isn't 4G and LTE pretty much the same thing?
LTE is 4G but 4G isn't necessarily LTE.
For AT&T there are two types of 4G
HSPA+, which is branded as 4G even though it's not much faster than 3G, and LTE which is the 4G we all know and love.
So when your iPhone shows 4G, expect significantly slower speeds than when it shows LTE (although they'll both be faster than 3G)
4G is a marketing term and has no controlled technical meaning. Basically, 4G is what your carrier decides it is. For AT&T, 4G means HSPA+ which is slower than LTE. Some might argue that HSPA+, or even LTE, are neither "real 4G", but there probably will never be a clear consensus on the definition of 4G, so we'll have to deal with the ambiguities.
For all that matters for you as an iPhone AT&T user, a LTE icon means your speed is faster than a 4G icon.
So on my iPhone 5, at times it says 4G in the status bar, and other times it says LTE. What's the difference? Isn't 4G and LTE pretty much the same thing?
So a Verizon iPhone 5 will show as either LTE or 3G but never 4G, correct?
Wake up.4G is a standard set forth by the ITU. The standard states 4G must be able to reach 100Mbps when moving at highway speeds and 1Gbps when stationary. LTE does not reach either of these requirements. Carriers have started a marketing war to see who can get the most subscribers and they've use the term incorrectly to brainwash consumers into buying things that are not actually 4G.
Wake up.
The ITU basically turned "4G" into a marketing term when it allowed T-Mobile USA to describe their HSPA+ network as 4G, since they had no spectrum allocated for LTE. In late 2010.
That's right, 4G has been a marketing term for almost two years, Rip Van Winkle.
My iphone5 stays on 4g and rarely shows LTE...is that due to my location?
You are wrong (and obstinate), Rip Van Winkle.The ITU never allowed it and still doesn't recognize it as being such. They just lack the power to enforce it.
You are wrong (and obstinate), Rip Van Winkle.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374564,00.asp
There is no "Intell" inside.
Following a detailed evaluation against stringent technical and operational criteria, ITU has determined that LTE-Advanced and WirelessMAN-Advanced should be accorded the official designation of IMT-Advanced. As the most advanced technologies currently defined for global wireless mobile broadband communications, IMT-Advanced is considered as 4G, although it is recognized that this term, while undefined, may also be applied to the forerunners of these technologies, LTE and WiMax, and to other evolved 3G technologies providing a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed. The detailed specifications of the IMT-Advanced technologies will be provided in a new ITU-R Recommendation expected in early 2012.
That's not how the world works. If everyone (or nearly everyone) calls HSPA+ "4G", it basically is, for all intents and purposes.In a nutshell, the ITU says "yes you can call it that, but that isn't real 4G".
Thus my initial statement of LTE not being 4G due to it not being within the IMT-A standard stands as correct. This Muppet has more than fluff inside.
ITU says that LTE and Wi-Max are retroactively giving the term 4G, yet does not define them as such due to then (12/2010) standards
In a nutshell, the ITU says "yes you can call it that, but that isn't real 4G".
Thus my initial statement of LTE not being 4G due to it not being within the IMT-A standard stands as correct. This Muppet has more than fluff inside.
That's not how the world works. If everyone (or nearly everyone) calls HSPA+ "4G", it basically is, for all intents and purposes.