Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
LTE is 4G but 4G isn't necessarily LTE.

For AT&T there are two types of 4G
HSPA+, which is branded as 4G even though it's not much faster than 3G, and LTE which is the 4G we all know and love.

So when your iPhone shows 4G, expect significantly slower speeds than when it shows LTE (although they'll both be faster than 3G)
 
4G is 101Mbps+ when moving at highway speeds and 1Gbps when stationary mobile cellular data. Currently this is WiMax, LTE-A, and some yet undeployed advanced forms of HSPA+. Current LTE is a 3G technology and maxes out at a theoretical 100Mbps.
 
LTE is 4G but 4G isn't necessarily LTE.

For AT&T there are two types of 4G
HSPA+, which is branded as 4G even though it's not much faster than 3G, and LTE which is the 4G we all know and love.

So when your iPhone shows 4G, expect significantly slower speeds than when it shows LTE (although they'll both be faster than 3G)

That makes sense. I remember on my friend's iPhone 4S it'd always say 4G even though I know it wasn't really 4G, but I came from an iPhone 4 so being on anything other than 3G or Edge is new to me. Lol. Thank you.
 
4G is a marketing term and has no controlled technical meaning. Basically, 4G is what your carrier decides it is. For AT&T, 4G means HSPA+ which is slower than LTE. Some might argue that HSPA+, or even LTE, are neither "real 4G" since they aren't fast enough to meet the International Telecommunication Union's 4G standard but carriers don't care and prefer throwing out inaccurate marketing buzzwords so there probably will never be a clear consensus on the definition of 4G, so we'll have to deal with the ambiguities.

For all that matters for you as an iPhone AT&T user, a LTE icon means your speed is faster than a 4G icon.
 
Last edited:
4G is a marketing term and has no controlled technical meaning. Basically, 4G is what your carrier decides it is. For AT&T, 4G means HSPA+ which is slower than LTE. Some might argue that HSPA+, or even LTE, are neither "real 4G", but there probably will never be a clear consensus on the definition of 4G, so we'll have to deal with the ambiguities.

For all that matters for you as an iPhone AT&T user, a LTE icon means your speed is faster than a 4G icon.

4G is a standard set forth by the ITU. The standard states 4G must be able to reach 100Mbps when moving at highway speeds and 1Gbps when stationary. LTE does not reach either of these requirements. Carriers have started a marketing war to see who can get the most subscribers and they've use the term incorrectly to brainwash consumers into buying things that are not actually 4G.
 
4G is a marketing tool that AT&T uses that basically is just a faster, tweaked version of 3G. Some refer to it as 3.5G. While LTE is "true" 4G in that it is usually 15-20x faster than 3G.
 
So on my iPhone 5, at times it says 4G in the status bar, and other times it says LTE. What's the difference? Isn't 4G and LTE pretty much the same thing?

Do a speedtest in the locations you care about. In the past, iPhone on AT&T was lucky to exceed 1 Mbps (that is Mega bits per second, by the way, not Bytes). OK for reading text-based email, but, too slow for a lot of other things. 10 Mbps is fast enough to do real work, like connect to your office email server and download big files. Or, watch pretty good video if you must. 100 Mbps is fast enough that unless you are actually in video production, you probably don't need an office. "True 4G", 1 Gbps, (= 1000 Mbps) is actually fast enough to do video production, at least until the world converts to quad HD/4K video.

I'm liking the speed test results that people are posting using LTE. Maybe not true 4G, but, fast enough for almost anything a consumer would want today.
 
4G is a standard set forth by the ITU. The standard states 4G must be able to reach 100Mbps when moving at highway speeds and 1Gbps when stationary. LTE does not reach either of these requirements. Carriers have started a marketing war to see who can get the most subscribers and they've use the term incorrectly to brainwash consumers into buying things that are not actually 4G.
Wake up.

The ITU basically turned "4G" into a marketing term when it allowed T-Mobile USA to describe their HSPA+ network as 4G, since they had no spectrum allocated for LTE. In late 2010.

That's right, 4G has been a marketing term for almost two years, Rip Van Winkle.
 
Wake up.

The ITU basically turned "4G" into a marketing term when it allowed T-Mobile USA to describe their HSPA+ network as 4G, since they had no spectrum allocated for LTE. In late 2010.

That's right, 4G has been a marketing term for almost two years, Rip Van Winkle.

The ITU never allowed it and still doesn't recognize it as being such. They just lack the power to enforce it.
 
Yea, HSPA+ isn't 4G. T-Mobile was the first to release HSPA+ with then calling it 4G. It was 3.5G and it still is. So on AT&T, "4G" is HSPA+ and LTE is LTE (4G).
 
You are wrong (and obstinate), Rip Van Winkle.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374564,00.asp

There is no "Intell" inside.

The excerpt below that PC Mag has used as basis for this can be taken a few ways. The excerpt:
Following a detailed evaluation against stringent technical and operational criteria, ITU has determined that “LTE-Advanced” and “WirelessMAN-Advanced” should be accorded the official designation of IMT-Advanced. As the most advanced technologies currently defined for global wireless mobile broadband communications, IMT-Advanced is considered as “4G”, although it is recognized that this term, while undefined, may also be applied to the forerunners of these technologies, LTE and WiMax, and to other evolved 3G technologies providing a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed. The detailed specifications of the IMT-Advanced technologies will be provided in a new ITU-R Recommendation expected in early 2012.

ITU says LTE-A and WMAN-A are IMT-A
ITU says IMT-A is 4G
ITU says that LTE and Wi-Max are retroactively giving the term 4G, yet does not define them as such due to then (12/2010) standards

In a nutshell, the ITU says "yes you can call it that, but that isn't real 4G".

Thus my initial statement of LTE not being 4G due to it not being within the IMT-A standard stands as correct. This Muppet has more than fluff inside.
 
Last edited:
4G = 3G that Deutsche Telekom got the ITU to rebrand so as not to embarrass T-Mobile, which is 3, 2, and 1 year(s) behind Verizon, AT&T and Sprint, respectively in building out an LTE network.

LTE = Real 4G. Some might quibble that LTE-A (the next version of LTE) is the only true 4G, but the basic technology is the same.

The bottom line is that in Midtown Manhattan, on AT&T's "4G" HSPA network I was getting download speeds of about 1Mbps. On LTE, I'm getting 10Mbps.
 
In a nutshell, the ITU says "yes you can call it that, but that isn't real 4G".

Thus my initial statement of LTE not being 4G due to it not being within the IMT-A standard stands as correct. This Muppet has more than fluff inside.
That's not how the world works. If everyone (or nearly everyone) calls HSPA+ "4G", it basically is, for all intents and purposes.

That's how marketing and general usage terms work. As a botanist, you can insist forever that a tomato is a fruit, but for Joe Consumer, it's a vegetable (the culinary/grocery definition).

If the "4G" term was really in question, there would be lawsuits left and right. Note that these organizations _do_ have the power to change things.

For a while, Palm kept on mimicking Apple iPhones so Palm handsets would sync with iTunes. The USB governing board put a halt to that when they warned Palm that the company was out of compliance (spoofing IDs) with the agreed USB specification.

You need to wake up and learn how the world works.

Oh, and the word is "excerpt", not "exert."
 
ITU says that LTE and Wi-Max are retroactively giving the term 4G, yet does not define them as such due to then (12/2010) standards

In a nutshell, the ITU says "yes you can call it that, but that isn't real 4G".

Thus my initial statement of LTE not being 4G due to it not being within the IMT-A standard stands as correct. This Muppet has more than fluff inside.

But the basic technology behind LTE and LTE-A is the same. LTE, whether "3.9G" or "4G" is still significantly more spectral-efficient than UMTS/HSPA, which is the older 3G network that T-Mobile successfully petitioned to be deemed "4G." In a lab, yes, HSPA can get speeds of 14.4Mbps or 21Mbps, but in the real world, LTE significantly outperforms HSPA.

----------

That's not how the world works. If everyone (or nearly everyone) calls HSPA+ "4G", it basically is, for all intents and purposes.

Abraham Lincoln reportedly asked a rhetorical question "How many legs would a calf have if you called a tail a leg?". "4" was his response, since calling something a leg didn't make it so.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.