4K Monitor Sucks!

Discussion in 'Mac Pro' started by mrkennethtong, Jan 15, 2014.

  1. mrkennethtong macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    #1
    Bought the suggested Sharp Monitor, and a week in, the text is far too small to read and a chore to have to keep zooming in to be comfortable.

    FAIL!

    Will be returning unless otherwise advised.
     
  2. GoCubsGo macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    #2
    Unless otherwise advised by who?
    It sounds to me as though the 4K monitor does what it should do and your eyes just cannot take the resolution. It happens.
     
  3. Umbongo macrumors 601

    Umbongo

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Location:
    England
  4. mrkennethtong thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    #4
    Just annoying and small. Had to zoom in on this to even type.
     
  5. Michaelgtrusa macrumors 604

    Michaelgtrusa

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Location:
    Everywhere And Nowhere
    #5
    Post pics?
     
  6. deconstruct60 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    #6
    If primarily concerned about text and not looking at huge pixel count photos/video then open Terminal and :


    Code:
     sudo defaults write /Library/Preferences/com.apple.windowserver.plist DisplayResolutionEnabled -bool true 
    to enable hiDPI mode. Reboot and select

    1920 x 1080 (HiDPI)

    as the monitor resolution.

    If don't have very high pixel count photos/videos to view not sure who "advised" you to buy the 4K monitor in the first place.
     
  7. mrkennethtong thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    #8
  8. HD303, Jan 15, 2014
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2014

    HD303 macrumors regular

    HD303

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Location:
    Observatory Park
    #9
    You get what you pay for

    If you're serious about a proper 4k monitor, the Sony PCM-X300 is the one to get. True 4k res (4096 x 2160). But, at 18k, most small businesses will go with the sharp.

    I've used this monitor and it is spectacular.

    http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/product-PVMX300/
     
  9. mrkennethtong, Jan 15, 2014
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2014

    mrkennethtong thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    #10
    So, small, and this cost me nearly $4,000 from the Apple Store.
     
  10. AnalyzeThis, Jan 15, 2014
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2014

    AnalyzeThis macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    #11
    "You looking at it wrong"
    4Kgate

    Get rid of this junk and get yourself 2560x1440 27" IPS for $450 and call it a day. (27" iMac equivalent scree size). Nothing wrong with your eyes, do not worry about it. HiDPI is crap. Once retina like scaling is offered by Apple - it may be looked at again at 1/2 price point.

    Even on Sony 65" 4K TV colors luck any depth and appear washed out. . Yes it is a lot of pixels on the paper, but it seems they could not master contrast on those screens so they look like cheap 1080p HDTV, figures.
     
  11. jerryrock macrumors 6502

    jerryrock

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2007
    Location:
    Amsterdam, NY
    #12
    Most people buying the 4K monitor are using it as a second monitor to view images or video footage and their primary monitor at a much lower native resolution for the program menus and text.
     
  12. CH12671 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2013
    Location:
    Southern US
    #13
    I wouldn't keep a $3,400 monitor that I didn't like, I know that for sure! That monitor isn't meant for everyday use, as OSx hasn't caught up to it yet. It doesn't scale correctly, as you've encountered. That monitor has a specific function, which is to get close and personal with photography and videography work. So it is most useful setup as a second monitor to offload such tasks on. As an everyday monitor, you are going to be much more satisfied with 1440p. Perhaps someday Apple will release a patch that correctly scales the GUI to 4k, but that's an expensive gamble to take. Personally, I would return it and get something MUCH cheaper. Use the extra money to pay down the nMP or buy more ram. Then, when OSx does come out with scaled 4k, buy a new one....they will be cheaper by then. Prices have already started coming down.
     
  13. mrkennethtong thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    #14
    I have a fully loaded Mac Pro. I appreciate your advice.
     
  14. ActionableMango macrumors 604

    ActionableMango

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    #15
    Anyone remember when Apple promised resolution independence for OS X?

    When was that, 2005? :eek:

    Still waiting.
     
  15. Outrigger macrumors 68000

    Outrigger

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    #16
    I'm confused as to why you're complaining when clearly, you know what to expect.
     
  16. mrsavage1 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
  17. Freida macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    #18
    lol, how is that related to his advice?
    anyway, i would return it too. its too expensive and obviously you don't have the need for it like some video editors or photographers have so maybe saving money and buy something that is better for your needs and then wait for retina to come out later?
     
  18. Yahooligan macrumors 6502a

    Yahooligan

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2011
    Location:
    Illinois
    #19
    A.K.A "I read it but chose to ignore it because I thought it would work differently for me."

    Seriously, why are you complaining about something that you knew would happen?

    ----------

    Dude, he has a fully-loaded Mac Pro. That's all we need to know, this guy is clearly a badass and doesn't need any advice from people with lesser machines. After all, worth and knowledge are directly related to our possessions. Fully-loaded Mac Pro = Pure Genius on an Einstein level.
     
  19. uzziel macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    #20
    I love my Sharp PNK321. I am running at 3840x2160 30Hz until I get my nMP, but it is awesome. I am looking forward to 60Hz.

    Yes, the text is small - but it is absolutely clear and crisp. Previously, I was running a Dell 30" at 2560x1600. I love the increased real estate.
     
  20. Anim macrumors 6502a

    Anim

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Location:
    Macclesfield, UK
    #21
    As a small help, In Safari press CMD and + to change the text zoom. Not great but might reduce eye strain if just web browsing.

    And there is the OS wide zoom using CTRL + Wheel up/down
     
  21. deconstruct60 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    #22
    What is the difference between 1/2 native hIDPI and 'real' Retina scaling?
    [ don't really think there is one. Other than more highly customized icons for that specific DPI it is largely the same infrastructure. ]
     
  22. mintakax macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    #23

    Why be so judgmental and borderline insulting ?
     
  23. deconstruct60 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    #24
    It is essentially capped at 30Hz and the text/fonts aren't going to be substantively better.
    For DCI 4K work, it is fine but as a broader usage computer monitor it is dubious. These are two different monitors aimed at different usage models. It isn't a "get what you pay for" issue. It is a select the right tool issue.

    ----------

    It is macrumors.... heard of the "wailing wall" ? this is the "moaning and groan wall". Some folks will complain if the Sun comes up in the morning.
     
  24. Umbongo macrumors 601

    Umbongo

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Location:
    England
    #25
    True, but this guy just wants attention and is seeking praise on his ability to purchase high end electronics.
     

Share This Page