Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

KPOM

macrumors P6
Original poster
Oct 23, 2010
18,482
8,613
If you start with the $999 model and update to 512GB, it's $50 less than the standard configuration 512GB model. The difference is 7 GPU cores vs. 8. Anyone thinking of saving $50? How much difference does 1 GPU core really make?
 
12.5% difference
I can divide 8/7 too. :) However, do graphics-intensive programs have to be specially written to take advantage of multiple GPU cores (like CPU-intensive applications need to be written to use multiple cores)? I notice that my Windows PC with Intel UHD graphics slows to a crawl during Microsoft Teams meetings when everyone is on video. Would 7 vs. 8 be that noticeable in practice?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0279317
I think you will have to wait till the test results come out hopefully next week. Or go with 12.5% 😳
 
If you want to roll with the 12.5%, you can at least take some peace in your spending 5ish% more for 12.5% more cores depending on your spec. At least thats how I'm going to justify it. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: IngerMan
Apple super strategic with this pricing. Trying to keep one model low cost but not letting have 256 with the 8 core. Why waste time disabling a core unless they are 8 core fails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave
I'm looking to go for the 16gb RAM instead of more HDD space. So it's a bit harder for me to judge. I made this graphic though in case it's useful for anyone. The prices are based off an Apple premium reseller in my city so they're almost identical.
FireShot Capture 866 - MacBook Air iStorm Cyprus store - istorm.com.cy.png


€1700 is way out of my budget especially seeing as though I want to get insurance and probably will need a few adapters.

Is the extra core reeeeeally that super duper?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wackery
I'm looking to go for the 16gb RAM instead of more HDD space. So it's a bit harder for me to judge. I made this graphic though in case it's useful for anyone. The prices are based off an Apple premium reseller in my city so they're almost identical.View attachment 1670436

€1700 is way out of my budget especially seeing as though I want to get insurance and probably will need a few adapters.

Is the extra core reeeeeally that super duper?
No it will only be 5-8% Faster in graphics benchmarks and only the first minutes after the M1 throttles they will be the same. Keep in mind the CPU is still the same only the GPU is slightly slower. There are no games and no real gaming ambitions built into the air and therefore no need for a gpu. I also got the 256 16 Air.
 
What I'd like to know is why would Apple even do this if the improvement is so marginal? Surely, a small gain in performance is not all there is to it?
I think its because some chips have defects in one gpu core. They disable it and can use the chip. If they wont do that it would be way more expensive. Thats nothing to worry about and totally normal to bin the chips in different performance classes.
 
I'm pretty convinced that 7 cores of GPU are more than sufficient. I'm moving over from a 2013 MBA and a HP probook work laptop. Thanks for all the feedback. I think I'll be getting the MBA M1 16gb 256.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VaruLV and KPOM
I'm pretty convinced that 7 cores of GPU are more than sufficient. I'm moving over from a 2013 MBA and a HP probook work laptop. Thanks for all the feedback. I think I'll be getting the MBA M1 16gb 256.
Agreed. Even the 7-core models destroy the 13" Ice Lake MacBook Pro. Keep the $50 and spend it on something else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VaruLV and Wackery
My OCD says I should go for 8 (even number) instead of 7 ... :oops: ..£50 extra ... (half) joking aside I ordered both for now... I cancel one in the next few days once I see some results... Ive also ordered the MacBook Pro ... Delivery not until Dec 8-15 so I got a few days...
 
Apple super strategic with this pricing. Trying to keep one model low cost but not letting have 256 with the 8 core. Why waste time disabling a core unless they are 8 core fails.
Of course that’s what that is, they disable defective GPU cores so they can still sell the not quite perfect CPUS. That’s called binning and is a perfectly normal practice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: srkirt
Apple super strategic with this pricing. Trying to keep one model low cost but not letting have 256 with the 8 core. Why waste time disabling a core unless they are 8 core fails.
It's exactly that. the 7 core ones come from binning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: srkirt
I think its because some chips have defects in one gpu core. They disable it and can use the chip. If they wont do that it would be way more expensive. Thats nothing to worry about and totally normal to bin the chips in different performance classes.
If that were true then it would be a different gpu core disabled in every chip but scans have shown it's always the same core. It's more likely disabling the 8th core core brings the power envelope down which makes the otherwise faulty CPU run stable. Another part of the mystery is why the 2018 iPad Pro shipped with this same core disabled and then it was enabled in the 2020 model.
 
It is binning, but I bought the 512 one for the memory exchange that the ssd does, not for the extra core ...
 
If that were true then it would be a different gpu core disabled in every chip but scans have shown it's always the same core. It's more likely disabling the 8th core core brings the power envelope down which makes the otherwise faulty CPU run stable. Another part of the mystery is why the 2018 iPad Pro shipped with this same core disabled and then it was enabled in the 2020 model.
What scans? How many scans could there be out there?
 
If that were true then it would be a different gpu core disabled in every chip but scans have shown it's always the same core. It's more likely disabling the 8th core core brings the power envelope down which makes the otherwise faulty CPU run stable. Another part of the mystery is why the 2018 iPad Pro shipped with this same core disabled and then it was enabled in the 2020 model.
I'm sure over the 15 months in between the two launches, Apple had made some process improvements that got the 8th core consistently within the power envelope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wackery
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.