It's so weird the 5500XT in Unigine Heaven has 64pfs and the 5300 has 63fps! ?
4:56
10:16
4:56
10:16
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
5500XT and 5300 could have same gaming performance?
- Thread starter Darajavahus
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
No, they aren’t the same performance. These tests are using different settings and resolutions so they aren’t an accurate comparison. I’ve screenshotted the videos so you can see. The 5500XT is much better for gaming.
Attachments
Unigene Heaven was released in 2013, when tessellation was state of the art. Games have moved on.
Generally the low end cards are targeted at lower resolutions (720p,1080p), while higher end cards are targeted towards higher resolutions (1440p, 4k). Ideally, a buyer would still be able to game, just at a lower resolution. A person seriously contemplating gaming on an imac would gravitate towards those higher resolutions, so a test at 900p contains no useful information (except, perhaps as a apples to apples comparison, which wasn't made.)
Still, the 5300 test tells me that my own card is getting long in the tooth.
There are some interesting gaming benchmarks on this video (starting at 9 min.):
For a number of games, the difference in performance between the 5300 and the 5500 xt doesn't seem that significant (e.g. only 2 fps difference on Shadow of the Tomb Raider?)
Is the difference between these two cards really just a matter of 5 fps or so?
For a number of games, the difference in performance between the 5300 and the 5500 xt doesn't seem that significant (e.g. only 2 fps difference on Shadow of the Tomb Raider?)
Is the difference between these two cards really just a matter of 5 fps or so?