Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

bushman4

macrumors 601
Original poster
Mar 22, 2011
4,132
3,853
5G just went live NYC Speed has doubled to 300 mps. However it’s 2 a.m. now so I expect a slower speed in the morning
It’s nowhere near the mmWave we see in Verizon stores
Now the question is … is it worth the battery life I’m going to sacrifice to get that speed ?
In my opinion, No
I’m disappointed as we’ve anticipated so much more for so long
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: macsound1

gwhizkids

macrumors G5
Jun 21, 2013
13,029
20,873
5G just went live NYC Speed has doubled to 300 mps. However it’s 2 a.m. now so I expect a slower speed in the morning
It’s nowhere near the mmWave we see in Verizon stores
Now the question is … is it worth the battery life I’m going to sacrifice to get that speed ?
In my opinion, No
I’m disappointed as we’ve anticipated so much more for so long

Interesting. But really, what do you need anything more than 300Mbps for? This seems like the old pixel wars in cameras…people want more but don’t really know why.
 

wonderings

macrumors 6502a
Nov 19, 2021
934
931
We have 5G here, it is fast, but for regular use like websites, YouTube, etc it is not really noticeable. LTE was/is fast as well and plenty for regular data users. I don't think 5G will bring much to our lives, I think where it will stand out is for industries that remote in or need the ability to control over devices or machines over a cell signal. Even the phones themselves, they are very powerful and more then the average person needs. I recently moved from an iPhone 11 to an iPhone 13 and honestly don''t notice any speed difference in terms of running or loading any apps. Sure the screen is better and the camera a little better, everything else is just not noticeable. I think we have hit a ceiling hardware wise for regular use. What is really going to get that much better?
 

MozMan68

macrumors 603
Jun 29, 2010
6,147
5,252
South Cackalacky
Like anything else, it is really about chicken an the egg scenarios.

"We don't need faster speeds...no one is watching movies or TV on their phones..."

"Why can't speeds be faster...all I do is watch movies and TV's on my phone..."

"We don't need faster speeds, I can watch TV and movies on my phone at high definition 720p..."

"Why can't speeds be faster? I want to stream and/or download 4K movies and TV shows on my phone because I now have that super nice new screen they just introduced..."

....and so on...and so on...and so on.....

Faster speeds will help drive development of stuff that can utilize the faster speeds.
 

gwhizkids

macrumors G5
Jun 21, 2013
13,029
20,873
Like anything else, it is really about chicken an the egg scenarios.

"We don't need faster speeds...no one is watching movies or TV on their phones..."

"Why can't speeds be faster...all I do is watch movies and TV's on my phone..."

"We don't need faster speeds, I can watch TV and movies on my phone at high definition 720p..."

"Why can't speeds be faster? I want to stream and/or download 4K movies and TV shows on my phone because I now have that super nice new screen they just introduced..."

....and so on...and so on...and so on.....

Faster speeds will help drive development of stuff that can utilize the faster speeds.

True. But I suspect those things will not be as prevalent in the mobile phone space.

We are starting to bump up against physical and physiological barriers. How much better will 8k video look than 4k does already, for example? However, as noted above, the increased bandwidth and speed will help in things like autonomous vehicle development.
 

bushman4

macrumors 601
Original poster
Mar 22, 2011
4,132
3,853
As long as there is no buffering in watching or streaming LTE is adequate.
Bottom line : It’s nothing like they promised and at this point in time doesn’t make a difference
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsound1

wonderings

macrumors 6502a
Nov 19, 2021
934
931
Like anything else, it is really about chicken an the egg scenarios.

"We don't need faster speeds...no one is watching movies or TV on their phones..."

"Why can't speeds be faster...all I do is watch movies and TV's on my phone..."

"We don't need faster speeds, I can watch TV and movies on my phone at high definition 720p..."

"Why can't speeds be faster? I want to stream and/or download 4K movies and TV shows on my phone because I now have that super nice new screen they just introduced..."

....and so on...and so on...and so on.....

Faster speeds will help drive development of stuff that can utilize the faster speeds.
You can watch a movie or TV on your phone with LTE with no issues with Netflix, Prime or anything else, it is more than fast enough to stream 4K content if you wanted to and had the data plan to s support it.

I am not against the development of faster speeds, I believe it has just hit a ceiling of noticeable improvement for regular users browsing, youtube/netflix and really anything else. I have screen shared in to my work computer while on the road using my iPhone as a hotspot for my iPad and was able to connect and do what I had to do with no speed issues, ran the same as it would had I been on wifi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orka

MozMan68

macrumors 603
Jun 29, 2010
6,147
5,252
South Cackalacky
You can watch a movie or TV on your phone with LTE with no issues with Netflix, Prime or anything else, it is more than fast enough to stream 4K content if you wanted to and had the data plan to s support it.

I am not against the development of faster speeds, I believe it has just hit a ceiling of noticeable improvement for regular users browsing, youtube/netflix and really anything else. I have screen shared in to my work computer while on the road using my iPhone as a hotspot for my iPad and was able to connect and do what I had to do with no speed issues, ran the same as it would had I been on wifi.
My point is, you are referencing current tech and current needs. It's okay for speeds to drive the development of new options versus the other way around which can be SO frustrating.

Alos, while many of us have ready access to wifi in our homes, at work, etc., 5G opens the door for many in rural areas where the cell phone tower is their lifeline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EedyBeedyBeeps

ManuCH

macrumors 68000
May 7, 2009
1,543
1,159
Switzerland
The thing with 5G is that you hardly notice the speed as an individual user, but in congested area, it's much better than 4G, as more users fit on the same cell tower with still decent speed. So especially in big cities with big population density or at big events, the difference will be very noticeable.
 

bushman4

macrumors 601
Original poster
Mar 22, 2011
4,132
3,853
On ATT it’s called 5G+ it went live about 2 AM and when I got up 7AM it was gone.
ATT does not have NYC listed as a city that can receive C spectrum
 

ignatius345

macrumors 604
Aug 20, 2015
7,499
12,640
I've gotten some 5G signals on Verizon here in Brooklyn, going back to the fall of last year. The speed test I ran at the time got well over 500 Mbps, which is a ton faster than I usually get -- and frankly a ton faster than I actually have any use for. The only time I could see myself wanting that much speed out of my phone is if I was tethering my Mac to it. If they put 5G antennas into MacBooks, that would be useful.
 
Last edited:

almostinsane

macrumors 6502
Feb 9, 2008
303
63
As long as there is no buffering in watching or streaming LTE is adequate.
Bottom line : It’s nothing like they promised and at this point in time doesn’t make a difference
If you use Windows 11 you won't experience any buffering.
 

zorinlynx

macrumors G3
May 31, 2007
8,336
18,517
Florida, USA
It's not about you personally getting 300mbps. It's about capacity.

It means you'll have a more stable, fast connection in more places when you use your phone out and about, even if there's a lot of other phone users there.

Only extreme nerds are going "I CAN DOWNLOAD A MOVIE IN THREE MINUTES" or whatever. Note that I'm an extreme nerd and I think that's cool, but it's not the main benefit.
 

elvisimprsntr

macrumors 65816
Jul 17, 2013
1,050
1,590
Florida
The only personal scenario I can come up with is when I'm watching a game at the pub, and a torrential tropical storm knocks out the pub's satellite TV service. I can VPN into my house and stream the live TV feed from my terrestrial HDTV antenna, then Air Play it to the pub's Apple TV. But then, mm wave doesn't propagate well through moisture or tropical storm.


80DC899E-86CB-4D24-AAAB-B205C94219F6_1_105_c.jpeg
 
Last edited:

jz0309

Contributor
Sep 25, 2018
11,199
29,508
SoCal
Like anything else, it is really about chicken an the egg scenarios.

"We don't need faster speeds...no one is watching movies or TV on their phones..."

"Why can't speeds be faster...all I do is watch movies and TV's on my phone..."

"We don't need faster speeds, I can watch TV and movies on my phone at high definition 720p..."

"Why can't speeds be faster? I want to stream and/or download 4K movies and TV shows on my phone because I now have that super nice new screen they just introduced..."

....and so on...and so on...and so on.....

Faster speeds will help drive development of stuff that can utilize the faster speeds.
But is it stuff that WE need or stuff that someone THINKS we need???
 

MozMan68

macrumors 603
Jun 29, 2010
6,147
5,252
South Cackalacky
But is it stuff that WE need or stuff that someone THINKS we need???
Does it matter? They compete against each other for our dollars. They will develop, we will buy/use what works best. It's not like 5G speeds are a closed system owned by a single company. Speed is speed.
 

macsound1

macrumors 6502a
May 17, 2007
835
864
SF Bay Area
5G just went live NYC Speed has doubled to 300 mps. However it’s 2 a.m. now so I expect a slower speed in the morning
It’s nowhere near the mmWave we see in Verizon stores
Now the question is … is it worth the battery life I’m going to sacrifice to get that speed ?
In my opinion, No
I’m disappointed as we’ve anticipated so much more for so long
Wouldn't it be amazing if wired internet companies pushed faster speeds and new technology
 

MozMan68

macrumors 603
Jun 29, 2010
6,147
5,252
South Cackalacky
Wouldn't it be amazing if wired internet companies pushed faster speeds and new technology
My speed keeps going up...went to gig service a cople of years ago...they upped it to 1.2 (really 1.4) with no price change. The installed fiber this Summer which will give me much higher upload. I'm happy with that progress.
 

upandown

macrumors 65816
Apr 10, 2017
1,306
1,321
5G just went live NYC Speed has doubled to 300 mps. However it’s 2 a.m. now so I expect a slower speed in the morning
It’s nowhere near the mmWave we see in Verizon stores
Now the question is … is it worth the battery life I’m going to sacrifice to get that speed ?
In my opinion, No
I’m disappointed as we’ve anticipated so much more for so long
I’m assuming you’re talking about c-band 5G. So you’re seeing 5G UW next to your signal. If that’s the case and you mentioned battery life, Do you notice a big hit to battery life while using the c-band?

Are you sure it’s not millimeter wave?

Thanks; genuinely curious.
 

sparksd

macrumors G3
Jun 7, 2015
9,877
33,316
Seattle WA
My speed keeps going up...went to gig service a cople of years ago...they upped it to 1.2 (really 1.4) with no price change. The installed fiber this Summer which will give me much higher upload. I'm happy with that progress.

I've been real happy with our GB xfinity here in Seattle. I switched from my own router to xfinity's modem/router and it gives solid performance throughout the house (with basement).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.