FW 800
What I understand is that the interface bridges for FW are the same on each end, ie the FW 800 in the Mac and the FW800 in the accessorie are the same. If it is possible to use an adapter on teh Mac port to slow it down to 400 and allow the 6/4 pin cable, why not allow an adapter on the accessorie [iPod] end to slow it down to allow it to be used on a FW400 port on a machine? This is the beauty of the FW since it a host independent hardware set, the bridges are in most respects the same.
BTW, I agree with the posters who are saying that the iPod will not have FW800, it's just too fast for a device that already has trouble filling up the FW400 pipe. The hard drive in the iPod could never even get close to the 800, no way. Perhaps a couple of years down the road, but is after FW400 is no longer showing up on any Macs, and FW has scaled out to the full range of 800-3600Mbps. And the thing you plug in can keep up of course. HDs gotta get faster. Perhaps Solid State Memory?!
Originally posted by KLFloyd
You may be right...but my undertanding from Job's keynote was different.
I was under the impression that a Mac with FW800 could use FW400 devices, with the adapter. Not the other way around. In the case as described above, the iPod would be the newer device (just like any other CD Burner or Scanner) trying to use the older machine...again I could be wrong just my limited understanding of how that worked.
Reguardless, if it works...I'm sure apple will want us to throw out another $50 for the adapter as our penalty for not upgrading to FW800 machines.
If anyone else out ther has any other info please do chime in...
What I understand is that the interface bridges for FW are the same on each end, ie the FW 800 in the Mac and the FW800 in the accessorie are the same. If it is possible to use an adapter on teh Mac port to slow it down to 400 and allow the 6/4 pin cable, why not allow an adapter on the accessorie [iPod] end to slow it down to allow it to be used on a FW400 port on a machine? This is the beauty of the FW since it a host independent hardware set, the bridges are in most respects the same.
BTW, I agree with the posters who are saying that the iPod will not have FW800, it's just too fast for a device that already has trouble filling up the FW400 pipe. The hard drive in the iPod could never even get close to the 800, no way. Perhaps a couple of years down the road, but is after FW400 is no longer showing up on any Macs, and FW has scaled out to the full range of 800-3600Mbps. And the thing you plug in can keep up of course. HDs gotta get faster. Perhaps Solid State Memory?!