Is the hardware cheap/powerful enough to support 13 & 15 inch screens?
This would really equalise the playing field between choosing and iMac vs Macbook if apple were to release 5K screens for the next MacBooks.
I'd think you need at least a 27" screen to have any advantage from a 5k resolution. It's impractical and (in my opinion) totally unnecessary on a laptop, since you probably wouldn't see any difference compared to the current hi-res laptop screens.Is the hardware cheap/powerful enough to support 13 & 15 inch screens?
This would really equalise the playing field between choosing and iMac vs Macbook if apple were to release 5K screens for the next MacBooks.
Being a laptop, people are often closer physically to the screen and a desktop. It would work. The GPU of what's offered in laptops vs desktops isn't that far apart..
That's what I'm thinking, I have to scale the resolution up one notch for my iMac because I think the text/images are too small at the default 5k rendering. I can't imagine how small the text will be for a 5k 15" display (never mind a 13"display)5K is unnecessary unless your eyes are ridiculously close to the screen.
Really? I find it just about right. I could go a little smaller. I like a little closer to 125-130 dpi on a laptop, and 120 or so on a desktop.That's what I'm thinking, I have to scale the resolution up one notch for my iMac because I think the text/images are too small at the default 5k rendering. I can't imagine how small the text will be for a 5k 15" display (never mind a 13"display)
You have fewer pixels, but they're spread across a smaller area. If you look at the retina displays, Apple has consistently doubled the pixel count in each dimension with respect to the prior standard resolution (yielding 4x the number of pixels). That's why you have 4K on the 21" imac (1920 x 1200 or 1920 x 1080 doubled) and 5K on the 27". The notebooks used the same formula. The standard resolution rather than high res was used.
And at some point they are likely to introduce 3x retina (just as they did on the iPhone). But there is not much purpose going higher then 500-700 PPI — at those resolutions a display would approach/surpass the quality of high-end printed media. Once we have reached such pixel densities, the entire concept of display resolution becomes obsolete, as the eye won't be able to distinguish pixel errors in the first place.
It's retarded to think your eyes could see that. Just wasted gfx performance. 13/15inch screen would need a magnifying glass to see a pixel.Shame. So the best Mac screens are set to look like the iMac for the foreseeable future.
Shame. So the best Mac screens are set to look like the iMac for the foreseeable future.